Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Fizaqat Ali Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:20.09.2013 Judgment delivered on :26.09.2013 CRL.A. 951/2011 FIZAQAT ALI Through ..... Appellant Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Mr. Deepak Chander Pal, Mr. Awnish Kumar & Mr. Kshitiz Kumar, Advs. versus STATE & ANR Through ..... Respondents Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 On the fateful day of 17.07.2010 at about 04:00 PM in the jhuggies of Kalandar Colony, Bhalswa Dairy, while Guddo (PW-15) and her son Sakeem (the deceased) were sitting outside their jhuggi; in the adjacent jhuggi Fizaqat Ali (the appellant) was beating his son; the deceased intervened upon which the appellant took out a knife and stabbed the deceased on his neck; the deceased started bleeding profusely and fell into the lap of his mother; Nafis (PW-12) informed the PCR who reached the spot. 2 The deceased was removed to the B.J.R.M. Hospital by HC Jagdish (PW-9)...
Mrs.Sulochana Vs. University of Delhi and Orr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
R-9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.9546/2006 26th September, 2013 % MRS.SULOCHANA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. H.S. Sharma, Advocate VERSUS UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner-Ms. Sulochana seeking benefits of One Time Upgradation Movement (OTUM) Scheme of respondent No.1/University of Delhi which is on the lines of Assured Carrier Progressive (ACP) scheme.2. The facts of the case are that petitioner was appointed as a Library Attendant with the respondent No.4-college/Shaheed Bhagat Singh College on 22.7.1968. Petitioner was granted her first promotion as Library Assistant on15.12.1973 w.e.f 1.12.1973. Petitioner got benefits of 4th and 5th Pay Commissions Reports and ultimately petitioners pay scale was revised to Rs. 4500-7000. Petitioner seeks benef...
M/S. Karamdeep Finance and Investment (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Developm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h September, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4152/2000 M/S. KARAMDEEP FINANCE & INVESTMENT (I) PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Adv. with Mr. Sameer Vashisht, Adv. & Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. with Ms. Ritagya Riti, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition reflects the predicament in which a person is placed on account of ignorance of law and apathy on the part of the instrumentality of the State, Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in this case.2. One Trilochan Singh Rana purchased plot No.14, Block A-2, Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi measuring 725 sq. yards in a public auction held by the DDA. A Perpetual Lease Deed was executed in his favour on 18th March, 1970. As per clause 4-A of the Perpetual Lease Deed, the lessee was not entitled to sell, transfer, assign ...
M/S Frick India Ltd. Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
$~R-2A(Part-1B) *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.2704/1991 Date of decision:26. h September, 2013 M/S FRICK INDIA LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Shobha and Ms. Jyoti Rana, Advocates. versus UOI & ANR. ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Frick India Limited has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 for the following reliefs:(a) issue writ, direction or order in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the respondents to allow to the petitioner Cash Assistance in lieu of excise duty terms of the letter No.F.1/2/69-EAC dated 7.1.1970 of the Government of India, Ministry of Foreign Trade, New Delhi; (b) issue writ, direction or order in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order calling upon the respondents to remit to the petitioner the amount of Rs.12,84,232.18 as per statemen...
P.Laxmi Prathyusa Vs. National Board of Examination and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
22 to 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6500/2011 Judgment dated 26th September, 2013 % KARNAM VNP KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus + THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 W.P.(C) 6503/2011 SAYED MUJAHID HUSSAIN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 + W.P.(C) 6683/2011 & CM APPL. 13517/2011 & 13221/2013 P.LAXMI PRATHYUSA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Sanjeev Sahay and Mr.Harish Malik, Advocates versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S....
Sayed Mujahid HussaIn Vs. the Deputy Director National Board of Examin ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
22 to 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6500/2011 Judgment dated 26th September, 2013 % KARNAM VNP KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus + THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 W.P.(C) 6503/2011 SAYED MUJAHID HUSSAIN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 + W.P.(C) 6683/2011 & CM APPL. 13517/2011 & 13221/2013 P.LAXMI PRATHYUSA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Sanjeev Sahay and Mr.Harish Malik, Advocates versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S....
Karnam Vnp Kumar Vs. the Deputy Director National Board of Examination ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
22 to 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6500/2011 Judgment dated 26th September, 2013 % KARNAM VNP KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus + THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 W.P.(C) 6503/2011 SAYED MUJAHID HUSSAIN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 + W.P.(C) 6683/2011 & CM APPL. 13517/2011 & 13221/2013 P.LAXMI PRATHYUSA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Sanjeev Sahay and Mr.Harish Malik, Advocates versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S....
Devender Kumar Bhardwaj Vs. Sh. Yogesh Chander Bhardwaj and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:26. 09.2013 + RFA(OS) 58/2013 DEVENDER KUMAR BHARDWAJ ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Jahanvi Worah, Advocate. versus SH. YOGESH CHANDER BHARDWAJ & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Abdul Samad, Advocate, for Resp. No.1 along with Respondent No.1 in person. Ms. Ankita Mahajan, Advocate, for Resp. Nos. 2 and 4. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The present appeal is directed against an order dated 02.04.2013 whereby CS (OS) 584/2013 was dismissed on the first hearing. The learned Single Judge was of the opinion that no triable cause of action is disclosed on an overall reading of the plaint. The respondents are present; they agreed that the appeal be heard finally.2. The facts appearing on the record on a reading of the plaint, materials and the documents annexed with the plaint, are that a family arrangement was arrived at on 18.02.2007; it was reduc...
Ashish Popatrao Jhadav Vs. National Board of Examinations and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
22 to 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6500/2011 Judgment dated 26th September, 2013 % KARNAM VNP KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus + THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 W.P.(C) 6503/2011 SAYED MUJAHID HUSSAIN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 + W.P.(C) 6683/2011 & CM APPL. 13517/2011 & 13221/2013 P.LAXMI PRATHYUSA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Sanjeev Sahay and Mr.Harish Malik, Advocates versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S....
Pulak Nigam Vs. National Board of Examination and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
22 to 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6500/2011 Judgment dated 26th September, 2013 % KARNAM VNP KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus + THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 W.P.(C) 6503/2011 SAYED MUJAHID HUSSAIN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Harshad V. Hameed and Mr.Dileep Poolakkot, Advocates versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S. Kashyap, Advocate for respondent no.1 + W.P.(C) 6683/2011 & CM APPL. 13517/2011 & 13221/2013 P.LAXMI PRATHYUSA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Sanjeev Sahay and Mr.Harish Malik, Advocates versus NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Rakesh Gosain and Mr.S....
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »