Delhi Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunil Buckshee Vs. K.M. Buckshee (Deceased) Through Lrs and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h September, 2013 % + RFA4422004 SUNIL BUCKSHEE Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anisha Banerji & Ms. Mrinalini S. Gupta, Advs. with appellant in person. Versus K.M. BUCKSHEE (DECEASED) THROUGH LRs & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. N.K. Chauhan, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Nitin Nayyar, Adv. for R-3. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 30.04.2004 of the Court of Additional District Judge, Delhi of dismissal of suit No.350/03/90 filed by the appellant for declaration that he is the owner of residential premises bearing Flat No.8762, Pocket-8, Sector-C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi to the extent of 40% share therein and for putting him into joint possession thereof along with the defendant No.1.2. The appeal was admitted for hearing and vide ex parte ad interim order dated 11.08.2004 the respondents / defendants were restrained from selling the property. The coun...
P.K.Kataria Vs. the Chairman and Managing Director National Fertil
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7302/2012 26th September, 2013 % P.K.KATARIA Through: ......Petitioner Ms. Anju Bhattacharya and Mr. Elgin Matt John, Advocates. VERSUS THE CHAIRMAN FERTILIZERS LTD. AND MANAGING Through: DIRECTOR NATIONAL ...... Respondents Mr.Ghanshyam Joshi and Mr. Gireish Kandpal, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner who retired/superannuated from the respondent no.1/National Fertilizers Ltd. on 30.4.2011. Petitioner claims the relief of release of the gratuity and leave encashment amounts which have been withheld by the respondent. Petitioner also claims payment of interest on such amounts not paid.2. The respondent places reliance upon Rule 35-A of the National Fertilizers Limited WPC73022012 Employees (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Page 1 of 7 Rules and the circular dated 10.9.1996 of the respondent to deny...
Chhotey Lal Vs. Kirori Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM (M) 113/2012, CM 1745/2012 Date of Decision:26.09.2013 CHHOTEY LAL .. Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Punj, Nigam, Advs. Mr.Samrat Versus .. Respondent KIRORI LAL Through: Mr. S. Chandra, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. Arguments have already been heard.2. This petition seeks assailing of order dated 17.12.2011 whereby application under Order 41 Rule 27 r/w Section 151 CPC, filed by the respondent, was partly allowed to the extent that he was permitted to lead additional evidence by calling or summoning the record of bank pertaining to account No.458714, Bank of Baroda, Kirti Nagar Branch, Delhi being operated by the petitioner (the plaintiff in the suit) and also to get his signatures compared with the disputed signatures by the handwriting expert. The petitioner/ plaintiff has grievance to this extent against the impugned order of the ADJ.3. The property in question was purchased in the joint names of the peti...
M.K.JaIn and anr Vs. S.S.Bedi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h September, 2013 % + RFA 804/2006 M.K.JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl & Mr. Eklavya Bahl, Advs. Versus S.S.BEDI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Sangeeta Chandra & Mr. Deepak Khadaria, Advs. AND + RFA 805-06/2006 M.K.JAIN & ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Sanjiv Bahl & Mr. Eklavya Bahl, Advs. Versus S.S.BEDI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Sangeeta Chandra & Mr. Deepak Khadaria, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1. RFA No.804/2006 is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 30th October, 2006 of the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi in suit No.70/06/1997 filed by the respondent and decreeing the said suit for recovery of Rs.9,14,573.90 alongwith interest at 10% per annum from 6 th January, 1995 till realization against the appellant.2. RFA No.805-806/2006 is preferred against the judgment and decree also dated 30th October, 2006 of the same learned Additional D...
Gurjeet Singh Madaan Vs. the Sub-registrar-ix (District South-west) an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 09.2013 Pronounced on:26. 09.2013 CS(OS) 340/2013 GURJEET SINGH MADAAN ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Dinesh Garg and Ms.Rachna Agrawal, Advocates. versus THE SUB-REGISTRAR-IX (DISTRICT SOUTH-WEST) & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.V.K. Tandon and Ms. Sucheta Kumari, Advocates for D-1. Ms.Surbhi Sharma, Advocate for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JUDGMENT (JAYANT NATH, J.) 1. The present Suit is filed under Section 77 of the Registration Act 1908 seeking relief of a decree in favour of the plaintiff directing defendant no.1 to register the document being Sale Deed dated 3.5.2012 executed by defendant No.2 in favour of the plaintiff in respect of Second Floor of property No.A-11/9, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi.2. The brief facts leading to filing of the present Suit are that M/s. Clement Overseas Pvt. Ltd. had purchased the property No.A-11/9, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi measuring 600 sq. yds vide Sale Deed dated 22.10.1997. A...
M.K.JaIn Vs. S.S.Bedi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h September, 2013 % + RFA 804/2006 M.K.JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjiv Bahl & Mr. Eklavya Bahl, Advs. Versus S.S.BEDI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Sangeeta Chandra & Mr. Deepak Khadaria, Advs. AND + RFA 805-06/2006 M.K.JAIN & ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Sanjiv Bahl & Mr. Eklavya Bahl, Advs. Versus S.S.BEDI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Sangeeta Chandra & Mr. Deepak Khadaria, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1. RFA No.804/2006 is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 30th October, 2006 of the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi in suit No.70/06/1997 filed by the respondent and decreeing the said suit for recovery of Rs.9,14,573.90 alongwith interest at 10% per annum from 6 th January, 1995 till realization against the appellant.2. RFA No.805-806/2006 is preferred against the judgment and decree also dated 30th October, 2006 of the same learned Additional D...
Jyoti Bansal and anr Vs. Managing Society and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.7127/2012 26th September, 2013 JYOTI BANSAL AND ANR Through: versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Rajiv Bakshi, Advocate. MANAGING SOCIETY AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate for R1to 3. Mr. Kamal Bansal and Mr. Sachin Chopra, Advocates for R-4 and 5. Mr. S.C.Meena, DEO Zone-27. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioners in this petition claim the relief of being granted monetary benefits which are payable to teachers in government schools. This relief is claimed as per Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 which provides that teachers in private schools will at least get such monetary emoluments which are being given to teachers in government schools.2. Counter-affidavit of respondent nos. 1 to 3 has been taken in Court today. A reading of this counter-affidavit does not show as to why the respondent nos. 1 to 3( the ...
Shivam Sharma Vs. the Directorate of Education and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:26. 09.2013 W.P.(C) 4187/2013 & CM 12972/2013 SHIVAM SHARMA Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. Lal Singh Thakur, Adv. THE DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vineet Mehta, Adv. for R-2 Ms. Bandana Shukla for Ms. Ruchi Sindwani, Advs. for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner was studying in Vivekanand Public School and appeared in various units and other examinations in the aforesaid class. As per the final report card, he obtained 36.9 percent marks in English, 4.9 marks in mathematics, 30.3 marks in Economics, 31.1 marks in the Business Studies and 35.4 percent in Accountancy. The petitioner had also opted Physical Education as an additional subject and he got gradeB in the aforesaid subject. Since the petitioner was not promoted to class XII, he is before this Court by way this writ petition, seeking a direction to the respondent no.2 Vivekanand Public Sch...
M/S Gold Developers Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. M/S Nitishree Infrastructur ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h September, 2013 % + CS(OS) 1560/2010 M/S GOLD DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tarun Dua, Mr. Rajesh Chugh & Mr. Anant Garg, Advs. Versus M/S NITISHREE INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR.... Defendants Through: Mr. Praveen Mahajan with Mr. Brajesh Jha and Mr. S.R. Saxena, Advs. for D-1. Mr. Girish Kumar Sharma, Adv. for D-2. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J IA No.5615/2011 (of the defendant No.1 for leave to defend) 1. The plaintiffs have instituted this suit under Order 37 of the CPC for recovery of Rs.10 crores along with pendente lite and future interest jointly and severally from the two defendants, pleading: (i) that the defendant No.1 company through its Directors Sh. Kashi Nath Shukla and Sh. Anil Jain had in early 2007 offered to jointly develop with the plaintiff No.1 various projects which defendant No.1 had in hand or were under p...
M/S Gs1 India Vs. Director General of Income Tax (Exemption) and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Writ Petition (Civil) No.7797/2009 Reserved on:18. h July, 2013 Date of Decision:26. h September, 2013 % M/S GS1 INDIA Through ....Petitioner Mr. Vivek Tankha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishabh Sancheti and Ms. Rani Kiyala, Advocates. Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) AND ANR. Through Respondents Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.The petitioner GS1 India it is claimed is a Not-for-Profit Society promoted by the Ministry of Commerce and Indian Industry, duly registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.2. The petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 17 th November, 2008 passed by Director General of Income Tax (Exemptions) denying them registration under Section 10(23C)(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) and for issue of mandamus directing that registration/approval under the said Section should be granted.3....
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »