Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation and ors. Vs. the Workmen Rishipal Si ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
$~14, 16 & 39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 573/2013 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Ms.Biji Rajesh, Adv. and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Adv. versus HARPAL SINGH & 460 & ORS. Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Varun Prasad, Adv. LPA 516/2013 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS .....Appellants Represented by: Ms.Biji Rajesh, Adv. and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Adv. versus THE WORKMEN (OMPAL & 1240 & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Varun Prasad, Adv. + LPA 514/2013 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Ms.Biji Rajesh, Adv. and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Adv. versus THE WORKMEN RISHIPAL SINGH & ORS. ....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Varun Prasad, Adv. LPA 573/2013, 516/2013 & 514/2013 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER 27 08.2013 % CM No.12144/2013 (delay) in LPA 573/2013 CM No.11043/2013 (delay) in LPA 516/2013 CM No.11038/2013 (delay) in LPA 5...
Ashok Kalra Vs. M/S. Akash Paper Board Pvt Ltd and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h August, 2013. + RFA 410/2012 & CM No.20988/2012 (for stay) ASHOK KALRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.M. Issar, Adv. Versus M/S. AKASH PAPER BOARD PVT LTD & ANR ....Respondents Through: Mr. V.C. Sharma, Adv. AND + RFA 434/2012 & CM No.21070/2012 (for stay) ASHOK KALRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.M. Issar, Adv. Versus PRAVEEN JAIN & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.C. Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. These appeals under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), 1908 impugn the judgment and decree dated 11 th July, 2012 of the Court of Additional District Judge (Central)-01, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi of dismissal of Suits No.241/2011 RFAs No.410/2012 & 434/2012 & 217/2011 respectively filed by appellant/plaintiff pursuant to the order of rejection of the plaints filed in the said suits.2. RFA No.434/2012 was listed subject to the office objection as to the court fe...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation and ors. Vs. the Workmen (Ompal and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
$~14, 16 & 39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 573/2013 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Ms.Biji Rajesh, Adv. and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Adv. versus HARPAL SINGH & 460 & ORS. Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Varun Prasad, Adv. LPA 516/2013 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS .....Appellants Represented by: Ms.Biji Rajesh, Adv. and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Adv. versus THE WORKMEN (OMPAL & 1240 & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Varun Prasad, Adv. + LPA 514/2013 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Ms.Biji Rajesh, Adv. and Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Adv. versus THE WORKMEN RISHIPAL SINGH & ORS. ....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Varun Prasad, Adv. LPA 573/2013, 516/2013 & 514/2013 1 of 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO ORDER 27 08.2013 % CM No.12144/2013 (delay) in LPA 573/2013 CM No.11043/2013 (delay) in LPA 516/2013 CM No.11038/2013 (delay) in LPA 5...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. VipIn Bhardwaj and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. h August, 2013 MAC.APP. 161/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Kaul, Adv. Versus VIPIN BHARDWAJ & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Y.D. Sharma, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 23.11.2011, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.99,407/- in favour of the respondent no. 1 / injured with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing the petition till its realization.2. The appellant also challenged the direction to deposit the award amount within 30 days from the date of the impugned order failing which interest @ 12% per annum shall be charged w.e.f. 09.08.2011 (judgment reserved) till realization.3. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that ld. Tribunal has granted the compensation as under: - 1. Medical Expenses : Rs.31,40...
Chander Prakash Kaushal Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 24/2010 & CM 44/2010(stay) % 27.08.2013 CHANDER PRAKASH KAUSHAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Mr. D.S.V. Krishnajee, Ms. Sushma, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. Ajay Kumar Agarwal, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this petition, petitioner claims the relief of pension and interest on delayed payment of pension. Pension in the meanwhile has already been paid to the petitioner, and thus the issue remains only as regards to interest.2. Interest is liable to be paid when there is unnecessary delay in payment of the pension.3. In the present case, the employer/institute is respondent No. 3- M/s.Sarada Ukil School of Art. This is an aided educational institution to W.P.(C) 24/2010 Page 1 ...
Ramesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 5865/2012 27th August , 2013 % RAMESH KUMAR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Advocate. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. B.V. Niren, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner, Sh. Ramesh Kumar by this writ petition seeks the relief of being appointed as a Peon with the respondent No.2/Veterinary Council of India. Petitioner also hence challenges the appointment given to the respondent No.3 by the respondent No.2 instead of appointing the petitioner.2. The facts of the case are that an advertisement was issued by the respondent No.2 for appointment to two posts; one of LDC and second of Peon. We are concerned with the post of Peon in the present case. The only requirement as stated in the ...
Harjinder Pal Singh Vs. Vijay Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 171/2010 Decided on:27. h August, 2013 % HARJINDER PAL SINGH Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Rajat Aneja, Mr. Ishaan Chhaya, Advs. versus VIJAY SHARMA ..... Defendant Through None. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present suit the plaintiff, inter alia, prays for a decree for specific performance of the contract dated 29th May, 2009 in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant thereby directing the defendant to handover the vacant and peaceful possession of property No. S-381, Lower Ground Floor, Greater Kailash Part-I, New Delhi measuring about 200 sq. yards and to execute the sale deed and other documents in favour of the plaintiff along with the cost of the suit or in the alternative to pay double the amount of earnest money paid to the defendant along with up to date interest calculated at the rate of 18% per annum till the date of realisation.2. The suit came up for hearing on 2nd February...
Mamta K. Sharma and anr. Vs. Sahitya Kala Parishad and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 3128/2012 27th August, 2013 MAMTA K. SHARMA & ANR. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Adv. VERSUS SAHITYA KALA PARISHAD & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Vibhav Misra, Adv. for Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Two reliefs are claimed in this writ petition which is filed by the widow and minor daughter of the deceased Sh. Raj Kumar Sharma, who was working with the respondent no.1-Sahitya Kala Parishad. First relief is claimed for compassionate appointment and second relief is claimed for entitlement to the monetary benefits which were payable for the services of Sh. Raj Kumar Sharma with the respondent no.1.2. On the aspect of compassionate appointment, there is for the present complete ambiguity in the records of this Court as to what are the relevant rules or the policies for compassionate appointm...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Manita and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. h August, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 522/2010 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through:Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. Versus MANITA & ORS ..... Respondents Through:Mr. Idresh Ahemad, Adv. for R 1 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the Insurance Company challenging the award dated 05.05.2010, whereby ld. Tribunal has granted a compensation of Rs.8,20,507/- with interest @ 7.5% from the date of filing of the claim petition till its realization.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued that on 02.09.2005 at about 10:30 pm the deceased, along with his father, was going to Garh Mukteshwar by a tempo bearing registration no. UP-14D-7105, i.e., the offending vehicle. The deceased was sitting in cabin with driver and cleaner and the father of the deceased was sitting on the backside of the tempo to take care of clay pots. When the...
Honorary Lieutenanat Sukhpal Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2013
$~ 18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C)No.5349/2013 Date of decision:27. t August, 2013 % HONORARY LIEUTENANAT SUKHPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Archana Ramesh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through : ..... Respondents Mr. Jatan Singh, Mr. Rajat Malhotra and Mr. Saqib Qureshi, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The instant writ petition challenges the order dated 12th December, 2012 whereby the Armed Forces Tribunal has refused to condone the delay in filing the statutory complaint by the petitioner.2. It appears that aggrieved by the failure of the respondents to grant promotion to the rank of Honorary Captain, the petitioner had filed O.A.No.6/2012. This application was withdrawn by the petitioner on the 5th of January, 2012 with liberty from the Armed WP(C) No.5349/2013 page 1 of 4 Forces Tribunal to file statutory complaint before the respondents within 15 days. The respondents were ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »