Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manoj Kumar Bhargav Vs. Pawan Kumar Bhargav and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:19. 07.2013. Judgment delivered on:07. 08.2013 + ARB.P. 235/2012 MANOJ KUMAR BHARGAV ......Petitioner Vs PAWAN KUMAR BHARGAV & ANR. .....Respondents ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Mishra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr Pawan Kumar, Respondent no. 1 in person. Mr S.K. Nanda, Advocate for respondent no.2. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. The petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) in the background of the following brief facts, which are essential for the disposal of the captioned petition.2. The petitioner alognwith respondent nos. 1 and 2, who are his siblings, are partners in a firm bearing the name Messers Bhargav Bhatta Company (hereinafter referred to as the firm). The said firm operates and manages a brick kiln situate at Jhajjar, in the Bahadurgarh district, in the ...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Fire Ram Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on August 05, 2013 Judgment Delivered on August 07, 2013 + W.P.(C) 3153/2010 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Adv. Advocates versus FIRE RAM SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by:Mr.S.K.Gupta, Adv. for Respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. A short question arises for our consideration in this writ petition which is, whether it is the age or the length of service in the feeder grade which would determine the appointment as Postman when the zone of consideration is from amongst the Extra Departmental Agents? 2. The few relevant facts are that the respondent No.1 was appointed as Gramin Dak Sewak on July 11, 1989, Meerut Division whereas the respondent No.3 was appointed as Gramin Dak Sewak earlier to the respondent No.1 on July 1, 1988.3. As per the Recruitment Rules the next higher post of (i) The existi...
Gnct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Vikram Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: July 25, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: August 07, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1520/2012 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus SACHIN GUPTA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Ajay Kumar, Advocate W.P.(C) 4483/2012 GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus VIKRAM SINGH Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Manoj Ohri, Advocate W.P.(C) 2514/2012 GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus SNEHLATA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate W.P.(C) 4301/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus NAINIKA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Manoj Ohri, Advocate W.P.(C) 575/2013 DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND A...
Mukesh Mohan Goel and anr Vs. Archaeological Survey of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4989/2013 MUKESH MOHAN GOEL & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Vivek Sharma Mamta, Advs. and Ms. Versus ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J (ORAL).1. The issue involved in this petition is as to whether a writ petition is an appropriate remedy when the reliefs sought in the petitioner have already been granted by virtue of a decree of the Civil Court.2. The petitioners before this Court claim to be the owners, in possession of certain lands near Arab Ki Sarai, Mathura Road, New Delhi. Their case is that the aforesaid property was initially owned by four persons namely M/s Mukhram, Gugan Mal, Panna Mal and Gauri Shankar from whom it was purchased by a partnership firm namely M/s I.S. Goel. The Estate Officer initiated proceedings against M/s I.S. Goel and Company which, according to the petitioners, was occupying a part of ...
Mrs. Geeta Radha Krishnan and ors. Vs. St. Anthony???s Girls Senior Se ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.6850 /2012 7th August, 2013 % MRS. GEETA RADHA KRISHNAN AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate. versus ST. ANTHONYS GIRLS SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Dr. M.P. Raju, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Abraham M. Pattiyani, Advocate for respondent No.2. Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, standing counsel with Ms. Bandana Shukla, Advocate for respondent No.4. Mr. S.C. Meena, DEO, Zone-27 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioners who are teachers in the respondent No.2-school pray for implementation of the circular dated 11.2.2009 issued by the Director of Education for implementation of the Sixth Pay Commission Report with respect to teachers and employees of the schools.2. The fact that Director of Education has issued a circular dated 11.2.2009 cannot be disputed. I have ha...
Raj Kishore Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anot
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on :29. 07.2013 :07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4748/2013 ANKIT ROY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Lalit Kumar and Mr Deepak Vohra, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mukul Talwar and Mr S. Mohapatra, Advs. % + Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on :31. 07.2013 :07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4823/2013 VINEET @ VINEET KUMAR (MINOR) THROUGH FATHER TEJA RAM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr R.K. Saini and Mr Vikram Saini, Advs. versus GGSIP UNIVERSITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mukul Talwar, Adv for R-1 Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on + :05. 08.2013 :07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4660/2013 NIKHIL BANGA AND OTHERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Subha Rao and Mr K.L.D.S. Vinober, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER ..... Respondent Through: Mr Mukul Talwar, Adv for GGSIP University Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel with Ms. Sana...
Sheetal Chaudhary Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on :29. 07.2013 :07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4748/2013 ANKIT ROY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Lalit Kumar and Mr Deepak Vohra, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mukul Talwar and Mr S. Mohapatra, Advs. % + Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on :31. 07.2013 :07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4823/2013 VINEET @ VINEET KUMAR (MINOR) THROUGH FATHER TEJA RAM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr R.K. Saini and Mr Vikram Saini, Advs. versus GGSIP UNIVERSITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mukul Talwar, Adv for R-1 Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on + :05. 08.2013 :07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4660/2013 NIKHIL BANGA AND OTHERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Subha Rao and Mr K.L.D.S. Vinober, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER ..... Respondent Through: Mr Mukul Talwar, Adv for GGSIP University Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel with Ms. Sana...
Gnct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Snehlata
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: July 25, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: August 07, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1520/2012 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus SACHIN GUPTA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Ajay Kumar, Advocate W.P.(C) 4483/2012 GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus VIKRAM SINGH Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Manoj Ohri, Advocate W.P.(C) 2514/2012 GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus SNEHLATA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate W.P.(C) 4301/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus NAINIKA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Manoj Ohri, Advocate W.P.(C) 575/2013 DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND A...
Nuzhat Jahan Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2013
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1256/2013 NUZHAT JAHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N.D. Pancholi, Mr. Kahorngam Zimik, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Through: % ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel for the State Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC and Mr.Malaya Chand, Advocates for respondent No. 2/UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR ORDER 07 08.2013 Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the state has filed a status report verifying the fact that the present petitioner was married to Mohd. Gulfam, son of Mohd. Usman resident of 2914, Kala Masjid, Turkman Gate, Delhi and her husband is not involved in any criminal case, as per the Police Station Chandani Mahal, Delhi. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for State has further confirmed that the petitioner is the only legally wedded wife of Mohd. Gulfam and out of the wedlock, three children (two boys and a girl) ...
Dig K.P.S.Raghuvanshi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 2862/2013 DIG K.P.S.RAGHUVANSHI Through:Mr.B.P.Singh, Advocate. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through:Mr.B.V.Niren, CGSC for respondent/UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The three appeals filed by the petitioner before the Central Information Commission were disposed of by a common order dated 17.4.2012. The order, to the extent it is relevant, reads as under:The parties are heard and records perused. With mutual consent of the parties, the following decision is given. File not CIC/LS/a/2011/002531 (a) Information may be supplied in regard to para 2a, para 2b para 2c and 2k of the attachment to the RTI application dated 28.02.2011. (b) The appellant and/or his counsel may be given inspection of the three files relating to the following ROGs. i. ROG for revoking of censure dated 29.11.2008 ii. ROG for expunction of ICR submitted to MOD a...
- ‹ Prev
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- Next ›
- Last »