Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Aug 07 2013

M/S Marinda Coop. Sugar Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-07-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 1047/1987 M/S MARINDA COOP. SUGAR MILLS LTD. & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Garg and Mr. Ashish Garg, Advs. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) Vide its decision dated 6.12.1975, the Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation came out with a Scheme to provide incentives for new sugar factories and expansion of the existing sugar factories. A perusal of the said decision would show that the Government had issued licenses for establishing new sugar factories as well as expansion of the existing sugar factories, but, on account of steep increases in the costs of plants and machinery required for such projects, the costs for setting up new factories as also for expansion of the existing factories had gone substantially high, as a result of which it remained no more economically viable to set up new sug...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2013

Preeti JaIn Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anot

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-07-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on :29. 07.2013 :07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4748/2013 ANKIT ROY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Lalit Kumar and Mr Deepak Vohra, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mukul Talwar and Mr S. Mohapatra, Advs. % + Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on :31. 07.2013 :07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4823/2013 VINEET @ VINEET KUMAR (MINOR) THROUGH FATHER TEJA RAM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr R.K. Saini and Mr Vikram Saini, Advs. versus GGSIP UNIVERSITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Mukul Talwar, Adv for R-1 Judgment reserved on Judgment pronounced on + :05. 08.2013 :07. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4660/2013 NIKHIL BANGA AND OTHERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Subha Rao and Mr K.L.D.S. Vinober, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ANOTHER ..... Respondent Through: Mr Mukul Talwar, Adv for GGSIP University Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel with Ms. Sana...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2013

Priya Kumar Vs. Gnct of Delhi and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-07-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2013

Raj Kumar Hem Singh Vs. Union of India and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-07-2013

#18 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5001/2013 & CM APPL. 11291/2013 RAJ KUMAR HEM SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Ms. Shweta Bharti with Mr. Shantanu, Mr. Neelesh Sinha, Mr. Vikram Hazarika and Ms. Risha Mittal, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr. Jayant Tripathi, CGSC and Mr. Satyajit Sarna, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Rajiv Kapur with Ms. Vatsala Rai, Advocates for R-2/SBI. Mr. K.S. Panikar, Advocate for RBI. Date of Decision:07. h August, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondent no. 1 to release the funds of the petitioner from an appropriate bank and for quashing of the letter/order dated 17th June, 2013 passed by Banking Ombudsman.2. Briefly stated the facts of the present case are that petitioner seeks reimbursement of two Fixed Deposit Receipts dated 6th Fe...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2013

Director of Education and anr. Vs. Neelam Rana

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-07-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: July 25, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: August 07, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1520/2012 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus SACHIN GUPTA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Ajay Kumar, Advocate W.P.(C) 4483/2012 GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus VIKRAM SINGH Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Manoj Ohri, Advocate W.P.(C) 2514/2012 GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus SNEHLATA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate W.P.(C) 4301/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.N.K.Singh, Advocate versus NAINIKA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Manoj Ohri, Advocate W.P.(C) 575/2013 DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2013

Vineet @ Vineet Kumar (Minor) Through Father Teja Vs. Ggsip University ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-07-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2013

Abhay Anand Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anot

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-07-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2013

Chand Ram S/O Zile Singh Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-07-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.A.328/2000 % Date of Decision: August 7, 2013 CHAND RAM S/O ZILE SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.G.Kabir with Mr.Nikhil Bhalla, Advocates versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Jasbir Kaur, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.* 1. By way of this appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a challenge has been made to the judgment dated 11th May, 2000 and the order of sentence dated 13th May, 2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge thereby convicting the appellant under section 307 IPC and has sentenced the appellant to undergo RI for three years with a fine of Rs.2000/- and in default to further undergo SI for three months.2. The case of the prosecution is that on the night intervening 27th and 28th January, 1998, SI Dharamvir, PW-10 who was posted at Police Station Vikas Puri had received an intimation from RML Hospital that one injured having injuries caused on his person by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2013