Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Impex Services and anr. Vs. the Oriental Fire and General Insuran ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. 08.2013 Pronounced on:08. 08.2013 + RFA (OS) 39/2012 M/S. IMPEX SERVICES & ANR. ..... Appellants Through : Sh. Vijay Gupta, Ms. Geeta Goel and Sh. Chetan Swarup, Advocates. versus THE ORIENTAL FIRE & GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Sunita Dutt, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This is an unsuccessful plaintiffs appeal against the judgment and order of a learned Single Judge, dated 2nd May, 2011 dismissing its claim based on a marine insurance policy, in CS (OS) No. 653/1980.2. The suit claimed `23 lakhs (i.e. insured amount plus interest) towards marine insurance policy claim. The plaintiff had insured a consignment of goods (PVC Resin) shipped by the second and third RFA (OS)39/2012 Page 1 defendants (the shippers) from Singapore to it in India. The first defendant (insurer) had issued two Insurance Cover Notes of 19...
Doctor Morepen Ltd.and anr. Vs. Poysha Power Generation P.Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.A. No. 52/2013 in CS(OS) 1276/2005 Reserved on:18. h July, 2013 Decided on:8. h August, 2013 % DOCTOR MOREPEN LTD.AND ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Suparna Srivastava and Ms. Anooja Srivastava, Advocates. versus POYSHA POWER GENERATION P.LTD ...... Defendant Through: Ms. Manmeet Arora, Mr. Prosenjeet Banerjee, and Ms. Vasundhara, Advocates for Defendant No.1. Ms. Pooja M. Saigal and Mr. Jitender Datta, Advocate for Defendant No.2. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 This chamber appeal is directed against the order dated 22 nd March, 2013 passed by the learned Joint Registrar wherein the objections raised by the defendants/ Respondents herein as regards the chief affidavit tendered by PW2 have been upheld and while rejecting chief affidavit of PW2 he has been directed to file a fresh affidavit. It also challenges the order of learned Joint Registrar holding Ex.PW2/11 to be inadmissible.2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff/ Appellan...
i.S. Rana Vs. M/S. Centaur Hotel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 08.2013 LPA 164/2013 I.S. RANA ..... Appellant versus M/S. CENTAUR HOTEL ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr J.S. Bhasin with Ms Rashmi Priya. For the Respondent : Ms Tanu Priya Gupta. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.This appeal challenges the order dated 07.02.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in the writ petition being W.P.(C) 2934/1997. The appellant was an employee of the respondent and was dismissed from service pursuant to a disciplinary inquiry held against him. The appellant/employee raised a dispute before the Industrial Tribunal which culminated in an award in his favour. The learned Single Judge has set aside the award passed by the Industrial Tribunal. The appellant being aggrieved by the same has preferred the present appeal.2. The dispute in the present appea...
Konark Care Vs. Triveni Infrastructure Development Company Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RESERVED ON:31. 07.2013 PRONOUNCED ON:08. 08.2013 CM APPL.7430/2010 (for restoration) in FAO(OS) 520/2009 ..... Appellant KONARK CARE Through: Mr. Akhil Sibbal, Advocate. versus TRIVENI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akhil Gupta, Advocates for Shri Ramesh Popli. Mr . Ashish Makhija, Advocate for Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT CM APPL.7430/2010 (for restoration) 1. This application seeks recall of the order dated 13.04.2010 made by the Court disposing off the appeal. The application is by one Shri Sandeep Arora, a partner in the appellant firm Konark Care. CM-7430/2010 in FAO (OS) 520/2009 Pag2. The brief facts are that the appellant had apparently entered into a contract with the respondent sometime in March 2006 for land development/consultancy in which it (the appellant...
Avnija Ahluwalia (Minor)through Next Friend Simran Vs. Mr. Vikaas Ahlu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on: + 17.07.2013 08.08.2013 IA No. 10545/2013 in CS(OS) 1990/2011 AVNIJA AHLUWALIA (MINOR)THROUGH NEXT FRIEND SIMRAN & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Mr. Deepak Chanderpal & Mr. Kshitij Kumar, Advocate versus MR. VIKAAS AHLUWALIA ..... Defendant Through Mr. Y.P. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Aniruddha Choudhury, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No. 10545/2013 in CS(OS) 1990/2011 1. Arguments on this application were heard on 17.07.2013. However, by typographical error, the order dated 17.07.2013 notes that arguments have been heard on I.A. 9361/2013 and judgment has been reserved on the said application. The order dated 17.07.2013 is accordingly corrected. Arguments were heard and order was reserved on the present application.2. Present application is filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure on behalf of the plaintif...
Ajay Kumar Vs. Gas Authority of India Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 08.2013 LPA No.521/2013 AJAY KUMAR ..... Appellant versus GAS AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. & ANR. .Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr D.K. Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate with Mr Pramod Kumar. For the Respondent : Mr Sandeep Prabhakar & Mr Vikas Mehta for R-1. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.The present appeal impugns the judgment dated 15.03.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.1163/2012. The appellant had filed the writ petition, inter alia, seeking quashing of the order dated 24.09.2011 passed by the Disciplinary Authority whereby the petitioner had been dismissed from the services of the respondent no. 1 company.2. The appellant joined the services of respondent No.1 company as an Executive Trainee w.e.f. 27.09.2007. The appellant was selected as Executive Trainee on the basi...
V.JaIn Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: July 29, 2013 Pronounced on: August 08, 2013 + (i) CRL.M.C. 473/2005 B.M. GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: + (ii) ..... Respondents Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Mudit Jain, Mr. Abhishek & Mr. Subadhra Shukla, Advocates CRL.M.C. 586/2005 V.JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sandip Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amarjit Singh, Mr. Gurvinder Singh & Mr. Shiv Gupta, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Mudit Jain, Mr. Abhishek & Mr. Subadhra Shukla, Advocates + (iii) CRL.M.C. 599/2005 VINOD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Sethi, Advocate versus STATE & ANR. Through: + (iv) ..... Respondents Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-Sta...
Commissioner of Income Tax-i Vs. Airline Allied Services Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
$~7. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 13/2013 Date of decision:8. h August, 2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus AIRLINE ALLIED SERVICES LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. P.K. Sahu & Mr. Prashant Shukla, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This appeal by the Revenue pertains to Assessment Year 200304 and arises out of order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 15th June, 2012.2. Revenue in this appeal has only raised two issues. First issue relates to deletion of addition of Rs.27,71,00,000/- made by the Assessing Officer, by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which have been affirmed by the tribunal. The Assessing Officer had noticed that grant of Rs.35 crores was sanctioned by the Government in the said year to improve air connectivity in North-Eastern Region. The respondent-assessee had ta...
Mohd Akhtar Vs. Suman JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h August, 2013 % + CS(OS) 836/2012 MOHD AKHTAR Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Mukesh Kumar Verma with Ms. Suruchi Mittal & Mr. S. Nigam, Advs. Versus SUMAN JAIN & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjeev Ralli, Adv. for D-1&2. Mr. Yogesh Saini, Adv. for D-3 to 7. SI Vijay Kaushik, PS Fatehpur Beri, New Delhi. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J IA No.7836/2012 (of the defendants no.1&2 under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996).1. The plaintiff has instituted the present suit inter alia pleading:(i). that the plaintiff is the owner in possession of ancestral land situated in Village Gadaipur, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi; (ii). however possession of the said land was taken over by Custodian of Evacuee Properties and an application for restoration of the said land unto the plaintiff was filed but which was dismissed; that a Revision Petition ag...
Daya Shankar @ Laxman Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. A. No.381/2010 Date of Decision:8. h August, 2013 + # ! DAYA SHANKAR @ LAXMAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Sethi, Advocate versus $ STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP CORAM: * HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J.By way of this appeal the appellant-accused has questioned the correctness of the judgment dated 29th August, 2009 and order dated 11th September, 2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the appellant-accused has been found guilty of the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code(in short IPC) and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and also to pay fine of Rs.3,000/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo six months simple imprisonment, for his conviction under Section 302 IPC and imprisonment for seven years and fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo three months ...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »