Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Viraj Steel and Energy Ltd Vs. Skoda Sponge Iron and Steel Co and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. REV. P. 417/2010 Date of Decision :12. h August, 2013 % VIRAJ STEEL & ENERGY LTD ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Atul Y. Chitale, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Karan Kanwal, Adv. versus SKODA SPONGE IRON & STEEL CO & ORS Through : ..... Respondents None. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 8 th June, 2010 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate whereby the Court dismissed the complaint of the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction.2. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents issued two cheques bearing nos.025671 and 025667 dated 15th December, 2009 and 28th December, 2009 for Rs.10,00,000/- and Rs.20,00,000/- respectively which were deposited by the petitioner in its account with Union Bank of India, Patel Nagar, Branch New Delhi and both the cheques were dishonoured upon p...
Sapna JaIn Vs. University of Delhi Through the Vice Chancellor an
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.9042 /2011 12th August, 2013 % SAPNA JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Petitioner in person. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI THROUGH THE VICE CHANCELLOR AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Khemka, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) + W.P.(C) 9042/2011 and C.M. Nos.20343/2011 (stay) and 2735/2012 (interim directions) 1. There are two reliefs claimed in this writ petition. First is for quashing of the memorandum and communication of the respondent No.1University dated 14.10.2011 and 13.12.2011 whereby the petitioner has been asked to show cause as to why the departmental proceedings be not initiated against the petitioner. Second relief is for appointing of an investigating agency to look into the alleged tampering of the result of one student Mr. Pradeep Kumar in M. Phil course by the respondent No.3.2. So far as challenge to...
M/S Super Seals India Limited Vs. M/S. Sos Oil Seals Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. 08.2013 + FAO (OS) 359/2013, CM APPL.12149, 12150/2013 M/S SUPER SEALS INDIA LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Anju Jain and Mr. Hitesh Sachar, Advocates. Versus M/S. SOS OIL SEALS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Kumar Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % CM APPL.12150/2013 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. FAO (OS) 359/2013, CM 12149/2013 (Stay) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Gaurav Kumar Singh, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the plaintiff/respondent.2. With the consent of counsel for the parties, the appeal was heard finally.3. The appellant is aggrieved by an order of the learned Single Judge dated 1.7.2013 whereby amendment of the suit was allowed. The defendant/appellants grievance is that the impugned order FAO(OS)359/2013 Page 1 permitted ...
Sannam Bharti Vs. D.T.C. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:12. August, 2013 + RFA No.939/2003 SANNAM BHARTI Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Anukul Pradhan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. K.C. Dubey. Versus D.T.C. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 16 th August, 2003 of the Addl. District Judge of dismissal of suit No.150/2001 filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.5 lacs as damages from the respondent no.1 Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) and Shri M.K. Sardana the then Regional Manager (Inter-State) impleaded as respondent/defendant no.2, Shri S. Sanjay Saxena official of the respondent/defendant no.1 DTC impleaded as respondent/defendant no.3 and from Dr. V.K. Srivastava, Chief Medical Officer of the respondent/defendant no.1 DTC impleaded respondent/defendant no.4. The appeal was admitted for hearing and the Trial Court record requisitioned. None appeared for the...
D.P.Sharma Vs. Delhi Vidyut Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
R-6 and 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2676/1998 & W.P.(C) 3069/1999 % 12.08.2013 W.P.(C) 2676/1998 D.P.SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate versus DELHI VIDYUT BOARD Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Nikhil Singla, Advocate. W.P.(C) 3069/1999 D.P.SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Advocate versus DELHI VIDYUT BOARD Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Nikhil Singla, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) 2676/1998 1. A limited issue is urged on behalf of the petitioner. Petitioner by this W.P.(C) 2676/1998 & W.P.(C) 3069/1999 Page 1 writ petition impugns the order which has been passed by the Departmental Authorities. Disciplinary Authority imposed the penalty of reduction of pay by five stages in the same time scale for a period of five years with further stipulation that petitioner will not earn any increment of pay during the period of reduction...
Ryan International School Employees Welfare Associ Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 6470/2010 % 12th August, 2013 RYAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION &ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Dhingra, Adv. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, Adv. for R-1 and 2. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for R-4. Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jaideep Bedi, Mr. Sunklan Porwal and Mr. Anubhav, Advocates for R-5: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. There is a limited relief which is prayed in the writ petition. The same is of implementation of the report of the 6th Pay Commission.2. I have had an occasion to examine this aspect in various cases and one such case is the case of T.P.Singh Vs. Guru Harkrishan Public School & Ors. in W.P.(C) 12132/2009 decided on 14.2.2013 wherein I have directed payment in terms of the 6th Pay Commission Report even by minority schools.3. The Director of Education has also issued...
M/S Roshan Lal Vohra and Sons and anr Vs. Mcd and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:12. 08.2013 + W.P.(C) 6652/2011 M/S ROSHAN LAL VOHRA AND SONS AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Siddhartha Joshi with Mr. Ankur Arora, Advocates. versus MCD AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel, Ms. Anupama and Mr. Shantanu Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioners, in these proceedings under Article 226, challenges an order dated 02.08.2011 by which it was blacklisted by the respondent - South Delhi Municipal Corporation which succeeded to the erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi. The blacklisting order was to subsist till 23.3.2011.2. WP (C) 6652-11 Briefly, the facts are that the petitioner was awarded a contract Page 1 for certain works by the Corporation on 19.02.2008; the period of completion of the contract was 18 months. The Corpo...
Yashpal Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1072/2013 Date of Decision:12. h August, 2013 YASHPAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Gurmit Singh Hans and Mr. Vishal Soni, Advs. versus STATE & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Addl.Standing Counsel, GNCT with Mr. Hemant Kumar, Adv and I.O., G.Joykutty, P.S. Anand Vihar Rly. Station. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. By virtue of this writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Cr.P.C, 1973, the petitioner seeks to get the order dated 04.05.2013 passed by learned Session Judge in Crl.Rev. No.51/2012 and order dated 18.07.2012 passed by learned trial Court in CC No.08/2012 set aside and for restoration of the criminal revision and complaint to its original number.2. The back ground of the case is that the petitioner filed a criminal complaint u/s 200 read with Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C before the learned Metropolitan Magist...
Ryan International School Employees Welfare Associ Vs. Director of Edu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 3128/2011 12th August, 2013 RYAN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Dhingra, Adv. versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jaideep Bedi, Mr. Sunklan Porwal and Mr. Anubhav, Advocates for R-3. Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. for R/GNCT CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The employees of respondent no.3-school have filed this writ petition through their association impugning the show-cause notices dated 29.4.2011. This show-cause notice reads as under:RIS-TY/ADMIN/2011/1817 To MS. SHOBITA MATHUR 29 KIRAN VIHAR, WPC 3128/2011 DELHI 11009 MS. SHOBITA MATHUR Sub: Absence from duty-Show Cause Notice. As you are aware, 28th April, 2011 was a normal working day in the school and all teachers were required to be present for du...
M/S Swastic Construction Company Vs. South Delhi Municipal Corporation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:12. h August, 2013 W.P.(C) 4556/2013 M/S SWASTIC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Adv. versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Biji Rajesh, Ms. Ashna Bhalla for Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advs. Mr. B.B.Aggarwal, Executive Engineer (Project-I), Central Zone SDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner, in these proceedings seeks a direction for quashing/setting aside Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) bearing Tender No.173604 which was issued vide Tender Ref. not D/EE/ (Pr)-I/CNZ/TC/2012-13/23.01 dated 23rd October, 2012 and further direction to the respondents to return the Earnest Money Deposit of Rs.7 lakhs. wpc4556/13 Pag2. The brief facts are that the respondent, i.e. South Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereafter referred to as the Corporation) published the aforesaid...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »