Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandeep @ Dhillu Vs. the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:12. 8.2013 CRL.A. No.172 /2009 SANDEEP @ DHILLU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sandeep Sanduja, Advocate versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State AND + CRL.A. No. 291/2009 KRISHAN @ SONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.S. Rohilla, Advocate versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this order we propose to decide the two separate Criminal Appeals preferred by Sandeep and Krishan, both accused in FIR No. 781/2004 to challenge the judgment dated 31.1.2009 and order on sentence dated 7.2.2009 whereby both the appellants were convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and sentenced toimprisonment for life with fine of ...
Lala Ram @ Vishal @ Kaley Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :8. h August, 2013 DECIDED ON :12. h August, 2013 + CRL.A. 1144/2011 LALA RAM @ VISHAL @ KALEY ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sumeet Verma, Amicus Curiae. + CRL.A. 796/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.1006/2013 PRAKASH @ OM PRAKASH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate. + CRL.A. 1108/2011 SUNIL @ SURAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Lala Ram @ Vishal @ Kaley (A-1), Prakash @ Om Prakash (A-2), Sunil @ Suraj (A-3) and Satish were arrested in case FIR No.433/2008 registered at Police Station Model Town and sent for trial for committing offences under Sections 392/397/411 IPC and 27/54/59 Arms Act on the allegations that on 23.12.2008 at around 01.45 P.M. they robbed Ashwani Kumar Rattan of `33,500/- when he was travelling in bus bearing Registration not DL-1P-7720. The assailants were armed with knives a...
Yes Bank Ltd. Vs. M/S International Electron Devices Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET. 608/2012 YES BANK LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nitesh Jain, Advocate. versus M/S INTERNATIONAL ELECTRON DEVICES LTD. Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR R. V. EASWAR, J.: (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed by YES Bank Ltd. under Section 433(e)/ 434(1)(a)/ 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent company for non-payment of an amount of `11,77,65,057.22 paise. The amount represents the loan advanced by the petitioner to the respondent, including interest.2. Notice of the petition was issued to the respondent but it could not be served since the office of the respondent was shut down and no other address was available. Substituted service was ordered. The petitioner accordingly got the respondent served through publication in The Times of India (English) and Hindustan (Hindi). Notice was also got served by affixation at the registered office of the respondent. Therea...
Dhananjay Singh Chauhan Vs. the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:5. h July, 2013 Date of Decision:12. h August, 2013 % + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.987/2011 DHANANJAY SINGH CHAUHAN Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma Verma, Advocates. ..... Appellant & Ms.Charu Versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J:1. By the present appeal, the appellant Dhananjay Singh Chauhan seeks setting aside of the judgment dated 23 rd May, 2011 and order on sentence dated 24th May, 2011 arising out of FIR No.346/2008, P.S. Connaught Place passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi whereby he was respectively convicted for the offences under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC for short) and Section 27 of the Arms Act and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- in default thereof to undergo further imprisonment for 15 days under Section 3...
Chandan @ Manjit Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :10. h JULY, 2013 DECIDED ON :12. h AUGUST, 2013 + CRL.A. 1384/2011 CHANDAN @ MANJIT ....Appellant Through : Mr.Subhash Gosain, Advocate. versus STATE .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. SI Sandeep Kumar, P.S. Kalyanpuri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Chandan @ Manjit (the appellant) challenges a judgment dated 26.08.2011 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 17/2009 arising out of FIR No. 245/2007 PS Kalyanpuri by which he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. By an order dated 27.08.2011, he was sentenced to undergo RI for five years with fine ` 10,000/-.2. Daily Diary (DD) No. 22A (Ex.PW-3/A) was recorded at 14.40 hours at PS Kalyanpuri on getting information that an individual has been injured near Electricity House, GDE Cremation Ground. The investigation was assigned to ASI Rajbir Singh who with Const. Yadram went to the spot. He came to know that ...
Sunil @ Suraj Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :8. h August, 2013 DECIDED ON :12. h August, 2013 + CRL.A. 1108/2011 SUNIL @ SURAJ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file Crl.A.No.1144/2011 titled Lala Ram @ Vishal @ Kaley Vs. State.. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE AUGUST 12 2013 sa of...
Krishan @ Sonu Vs. the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:12. 8.2013 + CRL.A. No. 291/2009 KRISHAN @ SONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.S. Rohilla, Advocate versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.For judgment, see CRL.A. No.172 /2009, titled as SANDEEP @ DHILLU v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI. KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.INDERMEET KAUR, J.AUGUST 12 2013 pkb...
Prakash @ Om Prakash Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :8. h August, 2013 DECIDED ON :12. h August, 2013 + CRL.A. 796/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.1006/2013 PRAKASH @ OM PRAKASH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file Crl.A.No.1144/2011 titled Lala Ram @ Vishal @ Kaley Vs. State. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE AUGUST 12 2013 sa of...
Union of India and anr. Vs. NitIn Kumar Dabas
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: August 12, 2013 + W.P.(C) 3113/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate with Mr.R.N.Singh and Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates versus NITIN KUMAR DABAS Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate with Ms.Aditi Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. With regret we note that from a particular Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal at Delhi we are receiving judgments which are being written most casually, without even discussing the relevant facts. So casually are the judgments written that they do not even bring out what was in the mind of the members of the Bench when they penned the opinion. This results in the writ court being burdened with the task of re-appraising the facts.2. But this case has compelled us to pen down our anguish as aforewritten because we find that in the im...
Bindu Talwar Vs. Rakesh Talwar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. Nos. 9658/2011, 9659/2011 in CS(OS) 1468/2011 Date of Decision:12. h August, 2013 + # MRS. BINDU TALWAR .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Y.P. Narula, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aniruddh Chaudhary and Mr. Rajat Kumar, Advocates Versus $ MR. RAKESH TALWAR ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta and Mr. Sukant Vikram, Advocates * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: The plaintiff after having spent almost three decades with the defendant as his wife and after solemnizing the marriage of their only child out of the wedlock has approached this Court by filing the present suit against her husband for maintenance, residence etc. under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 on the allegations that she has been treated with extreme cruelty by him by establishing illicit relationship with her sisters daughter-in-law and not paying not her any money to maintain herself and not only that she ...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »