Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rabinder Kumar and Another Vs. the Railway Board, New Delhi Through It ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2013
Shekhar Agarwal, Member (A) MA-512/2011 For the reasons stated in the MA, the same is allowed. OA-1866/2010 The applicant has sought the following relief:- (i) to appoint the applicant in the post of Pay Way supervisor for which the applicant is entitled for and same benefits as given to similarly placed persons with effect from the date of their appointment of others as Pay Way Supervisor with all consequential benefits and pass such further order or orders as deemed fit and proper. 2. Facts of the case are that applicant had appeared for the examination for the post of Pay Way Supervisor held on 16.09.2007. He was declared successful in the written examination on 05.11.2007 and was called for documents verification on 12.12.2007. However, his name did not figure in the list of final 12 candidates who were offered appointment. The applicant came to know that he was No.1 in the waiting list. On 26.06.2009 the applicant moved an application under the RTI seeking information in regard t...
Delhi Autorikshaw Sangh and ors. Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :07. 08.2013 Judgment pronounced on :14. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 5026/2013 DELHI AUTORIKSHAW SANGH & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms Rani Chhabra, Adv. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms Zubeda Begum and Ms Sana Ansari, Advs for GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The issue involved in this writ petition is as to whether a vehicle found being driven without a permit or in contravention of the terms of a permit, can be subjected to impounding under Section 207 and cancellation or suspension of permit under Section 86 of M.V. Act, even where the owner and/or driver of the vehicle have been prosecuted under Section 66 read with Section 192A of the said Act.2. The petitioners before this Court are some auto-rickshaw drivers and two associations of auto-rickshaw drivers in Delhi. Section 66 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to the extent it is relevant for the purpose of this w...
Dsc Limited Vs. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:02. 08.2013 Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2013 % + O.M.P. No. 742/2013 DSC LIMITED ...... Petitioner Vs RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Advocate with Mr Abhijat, Mr Jatin Mongia & Mr Harsh Hari Haran, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr Anil Seth, Advocate CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. Shorn of verbiage, the present petition is directed against release of monies which stand deposited with this court. The monies came to be deposited, post encashment of bank guarantees initially furnished by respondent nos. 2 and 3.2. The attempt is to preserve, by this action preferred under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act), the money lying deposited with this court in the form of fixed deposit receipts, pending the petitioner seeking access to arbitration. The purported gro...
Yashpal Singh Nagar Vs. Jamia Milia Islamia and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:14. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 5116/2013 & CM 11516/2013 YASHPAL SINGH NAGAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Kumar Dubey, Mr. Abhigya and Mr. A.K. Singh, Advs. versus JAMIA MILIA ISLAMIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Jaya Goyal and Mr. Varun Garg, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this court is a fourth year student in the BDS Course of the respondent Jamia Millia Islamia and was scheduled to appear in the final year theory examination of BDS Course from 1.6.2013 to 15.6.2013 and practical examination from 17.6.2013 and 25.6.2013. On 28.5.2013, two students namely Elham Jaidi and Israr Ali were found sitting boys Common Room and filling up some forms. A number of admission forms, loose photographs of students aspiring for admission to BDS course in Jamia Millia Islamia, ink pad etc. were found with them. Alleging that those students had admitted that with the forms...
Sandeep Kumar Sood Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :06. 08.2013 Judgment pronounced on :14. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4673/2013 SANDEEP KUMAR SOOD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Ujjwal Jha, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Amrit Pal Singh, Adv for Respondents 1 to 3 Mr Amit Bansal and Ms Ritika Nagpal, Advs for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 7B of the Citizenship Act, 1955 (57 of 1955) and in continuation of the notifications of the Government of India in the Ministry of Home Affairs number S.O.542(E) dated, the 11th April, 2005 and in the Ministry of Overseas Affairs S.O. 12(E), dated the 6th January, 2007, the Central Government specified certain rights to which the persons registered as the overseas citizen of India under Section 7A of the said Act, shall be entitled, such rights include the right to appear for the All India Pre- Medical test or such other te...
Dibyanshu Kumar and anr Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :06. 08.2013 Judgment pronounced on :14. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 7844/2012 DIBYANSHU KUMAR & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr Pratham Kant, Advs. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Asit Tewari, Adv. for R-1 Mr Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The issue involved in this writ petition is as to whether the students who took admission in the M. Tech Course at Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (GGSIPU) on the basis of Graduate Aptitude Test in Engineering (GATE) are entitled to scholarship which the respondent no.1 is disbursing to such students. The petitioners before this Court are the students of M.Tech Course in GGSIPU, they having taken admission on the basis of an All India Competitive Examinations called GATE. The respondent no.2-All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) has formulated a policy for granting schol...
Sushil Choudhary Vs. Bal Krishna Agarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No. 422 of 2006 Reserved on: July 25, 2013 Decision on: August 14, 2013 SUSHIL CHOUDHARY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Navin Chawla with Mr. Ninad Dogra and Mr. Praveen Sarthi, Advocates. versus BAL KRISHNA AGARWAL .....Defendant Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. T.N. Saxena, Mr. H.C. Kharbanda, Mr. S.K. Gupta and Mr. Sunil Saxena, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 14 08.2013 CS (OS) No. 422 of 2006 & I A No. 5377 o1. This suit is for specific performance of an advance receipt-cumagreement to sell and purchase dated 2nd March 2005 in respect of Industrial Shed No. C-50, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi110020 measuring 97.53 sq.mtrs. (hereafter the suit property) and in the alternative award damages in the sum of Rs.5 lakhs.2. While directing summons to be issued in the suit on 8th March 2006, the Court also directed notice to be issued in IA No. 2758 of 2006 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC and r...
Nepal Singh Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2013 LPA 178/2013 NEPAL SINGH ..... Appellant versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Atul T.N. For the Respondent : Mr Manish Garg CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.The present appeal impugns the order dated 21.01.2013 passed by a Single Judge in W.P.(C) 8046/2010. The learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent herein and has quashed the order dated 05.10.2009 passed by the Labour Court holding that the inquiry conducted by the respondent in respect of the charge levelled against the appellant was not fair and proper.2. The Labour Court had come to the conclusion that the findings urged by the Inquiry Officer were not based on acceptable evidence. This conclusion was arrived at by the Labour Court on the premise that the witne...
Sunita Rani Vs. the Vice Chancellor Jamia Millia Islamia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :05. 08.2013 Judgment pronounced on :14. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4686/2013 & CM No.10715/2013 SUNITA RANI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr B.P. Singh, Adv. versus THE VICE CHANCELLOR JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms Jaya Goyal and Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioner before this Court, who is aged about 46 years, completed her B.A.-English (Hons.) from Bhagalpur University, Bihar in the year 1990 and her M.A (English) from Delhi University in the year 1992, she applied for admission to B.Ed. (English) with respondent no.1Jamia Millia Islamia for the academic year 2013-2014 and also qualified the written test held for the purpose. Her name appeared at S.No.2 in the merit list. However, the candidature of the petitioner was rejected by the university on the ground that there was a long gap of more than 3 years between her passing out M.A. (English) and seeking admis...
Union of India and anr. Vs. Satish Joshi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 08.2013 LPA 197/2013 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Appellants ..... Respondent versus SATISH JOSHI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Rakesh Munjal, Sr. Advocate with Ms Anita Pandey and Mr Rakesh Tiwari. For the Respondent : Respondent in person. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.This is an appeal preferred by the Government of India through Joint Secretary, Ministry of Steel and National Project Coordinator, Project Management Cell, UNDP/GEF Project. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 20.03.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition being W.P.(C) 3215/2012 preferred by the respondent. The controversy in the present matter relates to the employment of the respondent as Manager (Finance and Administration) with a project being undertaken by the Ministry of Steel,...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »