Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Vs. Paramjeet Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2013
$~05. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 38/2012 % Judgment dated 21.08.2013 STATE Through : ..... Petitioner Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. versus PARAMJEET SINGH & Ors. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Suman Kapoor, Adv. with Mr. Tarun Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. State has filed the present leave to appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 07.06.2011 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, arising out of an FIR lodged u/s 498A/304B/34 IPC (Subsequently charge u/s 302 IPC was added). The acquittal of the husband, mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the deceased by the learned trial court has led to the filing of the present leave to appeal.2. The case of the prosecution, as noticed by the trial court, is that a call was received at Police Station, Rohini on 18.03.2008 at 8:06 pm stating "meri ladki ko sasural walon ne maar diya hai" whi...
Sanjay Arora Vs. State of the Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 481/2013 Decided on 21.8.2013 IN THE MATTER OF : SANJAY ARORA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. A.J.Bhambhani, Advocate versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with IO. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying inter alia for quashing of the order dated 18.2.2013 passed by the Deputy Director (Home), Govt. of NCT of Delhi rejecting his application for being released on parole and for directions to the respondent/State to release him on parole for a period of three months.2. Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner had approached the /respondent/Govt. of NCT of Delhi for being released on parole on the ground of providing medical treatment to his physically challenged mother and for restoring social ties, but the ...
Birla Vidya Niketan School and anr Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:19. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 5172/2013 & CM 11625-26/2013 BIRLA VIDYA NIKETAN SCHOOL & ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepak R. Dahiya, Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel for respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The only issue involved in this petition is as to whether for the Academic Year 2013-14, the petitioner was required to admit 75 students or it could admit 44 students, as has been done by it, in the category of the children belonging to EWS/Disadvantaged Groups. Vide notification number F.15(172)/DE/Act/2010/7792-7806 dated 28.2.2012 issued in exercise of the powers conferred by the sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (18 of 1973) read with rule 43 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 and under the provisions of Right of Children to Free and Compul...
Shashank Shandilya Vs. Guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :07. 08.2013 Judgment pronounced on :19. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4467/2013 & CM 10320/2013 SHASHANK SHANDILYA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Adv. versus GURU GOVIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vaibhav Kalra, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Ankit Jain, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The only issue involved in this petition is as to whether the petitioner, who is studying with respondent no.2, an institute affiliated to respondent no.1, is entitled to grant of NOC by respondent no.2 for migration from there to Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology, another institute affiliated to the respondent no.1-university.1. The petitioner before this Court took admission in respondent No.2-HMR Institute of Technology, which is affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, in the academic year 2012-13. On 27.06.2013, the petitioner applied to respondent No. 2...
Master Sidak Malhotra Vs. Prem Malhotra and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. No.14999/2011 in CS(OS) 729/2010 Date of Decision:19. h August, 2013 + # MASTER SIDAK MALHOTRA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishab Raj Jain, Advocate VERSUS $ * PREM MALHOTRA & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Sangram Patnaik, Mr. Umesh Yadav & Ms. Swyamsidha, Advocates for proposed defendant no. 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This suit was filed by the plaintiff, who is the minor son of defendant no.2 and grandson of defendant no.1 and nephew of defendant no.2, through his mother, who appears to have been deserted by her husband, claiming that he is being deprived of his legitimate share in the ancestral property in Lajpat Nagar which was originally owned by his great paternal grandfather late Shri Dewan Chand Malhotra and after his death was inherited by his grandfather, defendant no.1, and his brother late Shri Jagdish Malhotra, by his father and grandfather. It is pleaded that after the death of the gr...
Daulat Ram Gupta Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :19. h August, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 1480/2013 & Crl.M.A.No.10615/2013 (Delay) DAULAT RAM GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.V.M.Tripathi with Mr.pramod Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. In the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. the petitioner challenges order dated 28.1.2011 of learned Additional Sessions Judge by which the revision petition filed by the respondent No.2 against the order dated 28.10.2010 was accepted and she was discharged of all the charges.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the record. Counsel urged that the order cannot be sustained as at the time of consideration of charge, the Trial Court is required to take prima facie view and cannot scrutinize the prosecution case minutely on merits. There was enough evidence on record in the statement of the complainant ...
Rajiv Ohri Vs. Anil Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. th August, 2013. + RFA 379/2013 RAJIV OHRI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh and Mr. Tarun Kumar, Advocates. Versus ANIL AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jasbir Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.Caveat No.711/2013 1. The counsel for the caveator/respondent appears; the caveat stands discharged. CM No.12603/2013 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.3. The application is disposed of. RFA 379/2013 & CM No.12602/2013 (for stay) 4. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 22 nd July, 2013 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-01, New Delhi District in Suit No.141/2013) on admissions of ejectment of the appellant from flat No.1116, Sector A, Pocket B, First Floor Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070.5. Though this is a first appeal under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), 1908 and the Trial Court file is also not befo...
Easy Group Ip Licensing Limited and anr. Vs. Easyjet Aviation Services ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 09.07.2013 Judgment delivered on:19. 08.2013 CS(OS) 157/2010 EASYGROUP IP LICENSING LIMITED AND ANR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Mr. Udit Sood and Prateek Chadha, Advocates versus EASYJET AVIATION SERVICES PVT LTD AND ANR ..... Defendant Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. This suit for grant of permanent injunction restraining infringement of registered trademark, passing off, delivery up and damages has been filed by Plaintiffs no 1 and 2, which are companies incorporated under the laws of England and Wales against defendant no 1, a company incorporated under the companies act 1956 and defendant no 2, who is the director of defendant no 1, in respect of the alleged infringement and passing off of the plaintiffs registered trademark easyJet.2. The plaintiff no 1 is the owner and plaintiff no 2 is the licensed user of the registered trademark easyJet (hereinafter refe...
Uoi Vs. P.N.Pandey and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on July 18, 2013 Judgment Delivered on August19, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1317/2011 UOI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Geeta Sharma, Advocate with Ms.Sadhvi Shahi and Ms.Mithu Jain, Advocates versus P.N.PANDEY AND ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Dr.Sumant Bhardwaj, Advocate with Ms.Ankita Chaudhary, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition by the Union of India is to the order dated November 16, 2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in Original Application No.1785/2010, whereby the Tribunal allowed the Original Application and while reinstating the respondent No.1 giving liberty to the petitioner to resume the proceedings by curing the procedural irregularity with a further direction to pay the arrears and provisional pension within 2 months from the receipt of copy o...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. R.S.Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on July 16, 2013 Judgment Delivered on August 19, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6572/2011 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Ms.Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate with Ms.Megha Bharara, Advocate versus R.S.GUPTA ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.S.Rajappa, Advocate with Dr.Puran Chand, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in the writ petition is to the order dated March 29, 2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No.1822/1999, whereby the Tribunal had set aside the order dated March 24, 1998 imposing penalty of dismissal from service on the respondent and also the order of the Appellate Authority dated August 21, 1998 with the following directions: (i) The impugned orders dated 24.3.1998 and 21.8.1998 are quashed and set aside; (ii) The matter is remitted to the Respondents for resuming the inquiry fro...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »