Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mashaian Di Hatti Ltd. Vs. Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) 810 of 2012 Reserved on: August 6, 2013 Decision on: August 30, 2013 MASHAIAN DI HATTI LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney and Mr. Suraj Chaudhary, Advocates. versus HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit Chaudhary and Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Advocates. WITH CS (OS) 811 of 2012 PRERNA SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney and Mr. Suraj Chaudhary, Advocates. versus HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit Chaudhary and Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Advocates. WITH CS (OS) 812 of 2012 SEEMA FAMILY TRUST ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney and Mr. Suraj Chaudhary, Advocates. versus HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit Chaudhary and Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 30.08.2013 IA Nos. 2368 of 2013 in C...
Y.P. Khanna and ors. Vs. N.P.S. Bhandari and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EX.P. 398 of 2008 CCP (O) 103 of 2009, Ex. APPL (OS) Nos. 418 of 2009, 661 of 2009 & 692 of 2009 Reserved on: July 12, 2013 Decision on: August 30, 2013 Y.P. KHANNA & ORS. ..... Decree Holders Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra and Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Senior Advocates with Mr. Sunklan Porwal and Mr. Anubhav Bhasin, Advocates. Versus N.P.S. BHANDARI & ORS. ..... Judgment Debtors Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikram Nandrajog and Mr. Sushil Jaswal, Advocates for Group-A. Mr. Jay Savla, Mr. Prabhat K.C., Ms. Amrita Mishra and Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advocates for Group-D. Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Ms. Kajal Chandra, Mr. Abhas Kumar and Ms. Anubha Surana, Advocates for Group-E. WITH EX.P. 199 of 2009 ASHWANI KHANNA & ORS. ..... Decree Holders Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra and Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Senior Advocates with Mr. Sunklan Porwal and Mr. Anubhav Bhasin, Advocates. Versus P.D. KHANNA & ORS. ..... Judgment Debtors Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senio...
Shourabh Singh Vs. University of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:30. 08.2013 + W.P.(C) 5449/2013 & CM Nos.12170-71/2013 SHOURABH SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Samarendra Kumar, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for University of Delhi CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The issues involved in this writ petition are whether (i) the respondent-Delhi University is entitled to discontinue the supplementary examination from the year 2013 onwards and (ii) a student who fails in the qualifying examination, is entitled for admission to 3-year LLB Course of Delhi University.2. The petitioner before this Court joined B.Com Course with respondent no.2- SGTB Khalsa College for the academic year 2010-2011. The result for the third and final year of the said course was declared by the university in August, 2013. The petitioner, however, could not clear the practical test in the subject of Computer Application i...
Commissioner of Income Tax-ii Vs. M/S Leroy Somer and Controls (India) ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 410/2012 Reserved on:13. h August, 2013 Date of decision:30. h August, 2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II ..... Appellant Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S LEROY SOMER & CONTROLS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Kaanan Kapoor, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-II in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short), submits that the tribunal was wrong in affirming the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleting penalty of Rs.22,20,100/- imposed under Section 271G of the Act by the Assessing Officer.2. Tribunal has given two reasons for dismissing the appeal of the Revenue and upholding deletion of penalty under Section 271G. It has recorded that the penalty under the said Section can be imposed only if there is failure to furnish inf...
Om Prakash Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :29. h July, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on :30. h August, 2013 % + CRL.A. 410/2010 OM PRAKASH ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Saahila Lamba, Adv. versus STATE Through : .......Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G. S. SISTANI, J.1. Present appeal challenges the judgment dated 17th February 2009 and order on sentence dated 19th February 2009. The facts of the case unfold as under.2. As per the prosecution on 25th November 2004 life of a 16 months old girl named Bulbul came to an end as she was thrown against a wall by her own father, the appellant herein. Police Station Anand Parbat was informed of the incident on 25th November 2004 at 5:36 PM by the PCR. The information was recorded by DD No.17A, a copy thereof was handed over to ASI Subedeen who proceeded to the spot of the incident i.e. RC-111, Rajasthan Colony, Baba Fari...
Apoorva Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:30. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 4942/2013 APOORVA SINGH ..... Petitioner Through:Mr.Rabindra Tiwary, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through:Mr.Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 2. Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate for R.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner before this Court appeared in National Eligibility-cum- Entrance Test (U.G.) 2013 held on 5th May, 2013. The seats in various medical colleges are divided into two categories called `All India Quota and `State Quota. 15% of the seats are allocated to the All India Quota whereas the remaining 85% seats go the State Quota. While filling up the application form, the petitioner selected the option `Not Applicable against the All India Quota, whereas she selected three States, namely, Delhi, U.P. and Maharasthra in respect of the State Quota seats. As a result, no rank of the petitioner in respect of All I...
Tara Sharma and anr. Vs. the New India Assurance Co.Ltd. and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. h July, 2013 Pronounced on:30. h August, 2013 + MAC.APP. 185/2009 TARA SHARMA & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. with Ms. Mamta Bhardwaj, Adv. versus THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. & ORS...... Respondent Through: Mr. D.D. Singh, Adv. with Mr. Navdeep Singh, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Arati Mahajan, Adv. for R-4/DTC. + MAC.APP. 236/2009 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.D. Singh, Adv. with Mr. Navdeep Singh, Adv. versus RAKESH AHUJA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. with Ms. Mamta Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-3. MAC.APP. 238/2009 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D.D. Singh, Adv. with Mr. Navdeep Singh, Adv. versus RAKESH AHUJA & ORS Through: MAC. APP. 185/2009, 236/2009 & 238/20092 ..... Respondent Mr. Navneet Goyal, Adv. with Ms. Mamta Bhardwaj, Adv. for R-3 to R-6. Page 1 of 11 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J...
NitIn Kumar Arora Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.182/2010 & CRL.M.(BAIL). 1309/2013 Judgment reserved on 7th August, 2013. Judgment delivered on 30th August, 2013. % NITIN KUMAR ARORA Through : Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. ..... Appellant versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Through : Ms.Richa Kapoor, Adv. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G.S.SISTANI, J 1.Present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and is directed against the judgment dated 31.10.2009 and order on sentence dated 7.11.2009 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, whereby the appellant has been convicted to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, fine of Rs.50,000/- and in default thereof further rigorous imprisonment for two years. A further direction has also been issued that life imprisonment in this case would be complete life imprisonment without any commutation on ac...
Ankur Mutreja Vs. Delhi Police
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) No. 1037/2012 & Crl.M.A.13021/2012 Date of Decision:30. h August, 2013 ANKUR MUTREJA ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus DELHI POLICE Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC for the State with Ms. Charu Dalal, Adv. SI R.K.Jha, P.S. Jagatpuri. Mr.K.K.Malhotra, Adv. for respondent no.2. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for issuance of a writ of mandamus seeking a direction to Delhi Police to pass orders u/s 149 Cr.P.C addressed to the Secretary, Aviation Employees Co-operative House Building Society (hereinafter referred to as the `Society) restraining them from locating halwais/private caterers in any open area in and around Gagan Vihar Community Hall, whether within or outside the premises of the Gagan Vihar Community Hall or fro...
Jagdeep Gupta Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2013
I-1 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.555/1998 JAGDEEP GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Diya Kapoor, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ....... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Advocate for State along with Inspector Ram Niwas, SHO P.S. Keshav Puram CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL ORDER 30 08.2013 % None is present on behalf of the appellant. Ms.Diya Kapoor, Advocate, who is present in Court, is appointed as an Amicus Curiae in the matter. The matter was passed over once to enable the Amicus Curiae to go through the file. At the second call, Ms.Diya Kapoor, learned Amicus Curiae submits that during the pendency of this appeal an application [Crl.M.No.6934/2004] was filed by the appellant to bring on record the birth certificate of the appellant and to show that the appellant was minor on the date of commission of the offence. Counsel further submits that by an order dated 15.3.2005 the said application was allowed and the app...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »