Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Smcc Construction India Ltd Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income- ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on : Judgment pronounced on: + 10th July23. d August, 2013 W.P.(C) No.2230/2012 M/S. SMCC CONSTRUCTION INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nageshwar Rao with Ms. Sayaree B. Malik, Advocates versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX ... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The petitioner by way of the present writ petition has challenged order dated 15.03.2012 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax disposing of the objections filed by the petitioner against issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as (the Act) and the very issuance of the notice dated ===================================================================== W.P.(C) 2230/2012 Page 1 o18. 12.2006.2. The assessment year in issue is 2001-02.3. The petitioner is an Indian company engaged in t...
Mrs. Kamla Devi Vs. Union of India (Ministry of Communication) Through ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
Shekhar Agarwal, Member (A) This O.A. has been filed seeking the following relief:- (i) Quash and set aside order dt. 17.06.2011 (Annexure A-1) and order dated 31.12.2009 (Annexure A-2) with all consequential benefits of service including reinstatement in service restored to the applicant. (ii) Pass other order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Facts of the case are that the applicant, who was working as Gramin Dak Sewak (Branch Post Master) since the year 1991, on 19.02.2004 she was chargsheeted for major penalty proceedings on the following charges:- Article I of Charge: It is allged against Smt. Kamla Devi that while working as GDS (BPM), Khera Khurd, Delhi, on 3.2.2001 received the pass book from Sh. Devender Kumar, depositor, (Saving Bank Account No.3147679) and after making entry in the branch post office daily journal, sent the passbook to the Post Office, Khera Kalan, Delhi, for seeking approval of withdrawl of Rs.10,000 by the ...
State Vs. Anil Bhardwaj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. No.377/2013 IN THE MATTER OF : STATE Date of Decision 23.08.2013 ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC with Ms. Charu Dalal, Advocate and ASI Vijay Pal. versus ANIL BHARDWAJ Through : Nemo ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner/State under Section 378 Cr.P.C. praying inter alia for grant of leave to assail the judgment dated 20.10.2010 passed by the learned ASJ in SC No.67/2001, arising out of case FIR No.222/2000 lodged by the father of the deceased prosecutrix under Sections 306/363/366/376 IPC with PS Alipur, Delhi and case FIR No.221/2000 under Sections 309/306 IPC with PS Nabi Karim, Delhi on information received from the accused respondent.2. The brief facts of the case as culled out from the impugned judgment are that on 10.6.2000, a case of kidnapping was registered at PS Alipur, Delhi at the instance of the complainant, Ash...
Poonam Singh Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :9th May, 2013 Judgment delivered on:22. d August,2013 % + CRL.M.C. No. 1604/2007 & Crl. M.A. No. 5582/2007 (for stay) POONAM SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Malavika Rajkotia and Mr.Chetanya Puri, Advocates with Petitioner in person. Versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: SHO Rajender Gautam, P.S. Alipur for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.K.Malik, Mr. Rahul Raj Malik and Mr. Rajeev Chauhan, Advocates. AND + CRL.M.C. No. 2751/2007 & Crl. M.A. No. 9723/07 (for stay) NARENDER SINGH SALKAN Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Malavika Rajkotia and Mr.Chetanya Puri, Advocates with Petitioner in person. Versus STATE & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents SHO Rajender Gautam, P.S. Alipur for Respondent No.1. Mr.V.K.Malik, Mr. Rahul Raj Malik and Mr. Rajeev Chauhan, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.Crl. M.A. Nos. 18903 & 18904/2011 (both for adjournment) in CRL.M.C. Nos. 1604 & 2751 of 2007 Dismissed as infr...
Dr. JaIn Clinic Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sudesh Kumar Jassal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: July 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: August 22, 2013 + RC. Rev. No.136/2012 & C.M. No.5383/2012 DR. JAIN CLINIC PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.G.P.Thareja, Adv. with Mr.Alok Kumar, Ms.Manisha Agarwal & Mr.Neeraj Gupta, Advs. versus SUDESH KUMAR JASSAL Through ..... Respondent Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Tejas Karia, Mr.Karan Mehra, Mr.Swapnil Gupta, Mr.Arjun Palli & Mr.Sanyat Lodha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The abovementioned revision petition under Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter called the Act) has been filed by the petitioner assailing the order dated 13th December, 2011 passed by the learned RC whereby the application for leave to defend filed by the petitioner was rejected in the eviction petition preferred by the respondent, mainly, on the ground that the respondent is the owner of the demised premises and bonafidely require t...
Delhi Automobiles Ltd. Vs. the Official Liquidator and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. 07.2013 Decided on:22. 08.2013 + CO.APPL.27-29/2011, C.M. APPL.8046/2011 (for stay), C.M.APPL.8728/2012 (Under Order I Rule 10), C.M. APPL.8729/2012 (for exemption), C.M. APPL.8730/2012 (Under Order I Rule10) & C.M. APPL.8731/2012 (for exemption) DELHI AUTOMOBILES LTD. ..... Appellant versus THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ANR...... Respondents Appearance: Sh. Bhanoo Sood, Advocate, for Appellant No.1 in Co.Appl.26/2011. Sh. Girdhar Govind with Ms. Priyanka Kalra, Advocates, for Resp. No.2 in Item No.1 and for appellant in Co.Appl.27-29/11. Ms. Kajal Chandra, Ms. Renu Kuhar and Ms. Swati Sinha, Advocates, for Resp. No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % For detailed judgment, the decision dated 22.08.2013 in Co.App.26/2011 may be referred to. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) G.P. MITTAL (JUDGE) AUGUST 22 2013 CO. APPL. 27-29/11 Page 1...
Ramanand Singh Through Lrs Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 549/2010 22nd August , 2013 % RAMANAND SINGH THROUGH LRS ......Petitioners Through: Mr. I.C. Mishra, Advocate with Ms. Swati Chakraborty, Advocate. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition was filed by late Sh. Ramanand Singh claiming freedom fighters pension. Sh. Ramanand Singh has expired during the pendency of this case and his legal heirs being his widow and his sons have been substituted in his place.2. As per the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, a person has to file his application supported by the necessary documents to the Central Government. The Central Government then sends this application to the State Government for verification and recommendation. After the State Governme...
M/S. National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bimla Devi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
$~R-26A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22nd August, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 347/2006 M/S. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocate. Versus BIMLA DEVI AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Monika, Amicus Curiae. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal arises out of a judgment dated 27.01.2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the learned Tribunal) in Suit No.66/04 preferred under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the respondent Nos.1 to 6/claimants for the death of Parmanad, who died in a motor accident occurred on 29.12.2003.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company has submitted that the claim petition was filed under Section 163A of the Act, accordingly, the claim could be granted against the third party risk. Since the deceased was driving the TSR taken by him on hire from the ow...
Asha Narang Spaak and anr Vs. M/S Hafco Brass Usa
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IA 12809/2012 (by plaintiff u/O XII R 6 CPC) in CS(OS) 594/2012 Reserved on:30. h July, 2013 Decided on:22. d August, 2013 % ASHA NARANG SPAAK & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr. Ravi Sikri, Mr. P.K. Sharma, Mr. Sagari Dhanda, Advs. versus M/S HAFCO BRASS USA Through ..... Defendants Mr. J.C. Mahindro, Adv. with defendant No.2 in person. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 The plaintiffs have filed the present suit, inter alia, praying for a decree of possession of ground floor of A-27, Nizamuddin West, New Delhi with mesne profit with effect from 1st January, 2012 till the actual physical possession of the premises is delivered along with the costs.2. By way of present application the plaintiffs pray for passing of a preliminary decree of possession of the demised premises consisting of one dining room, three bed rooms with attached bath rooms, a kitchen, a servant quarter and front lawn from the defendants on the basis of admissions mad...
Moser Baer India Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-22-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :17. h July, 2013 Judgment pronounced on:22. d August, 2013 WP(C) 1004/2013 MOSER BAER INDIA LTD. Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The petitioner by way of the present petition has challenged the order dated 01.02.2013, passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and the issuance of notice dated 04.05.2011 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and the proceedings initiated pursuant thereto.2. Assessment year in issue is 2005-06.3. The petitioner is a company engaged in the business of ===================================================================== WP(C) 1004/2013 Page 1 of 18 manufacture and sale of optical...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »