Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravinder Kumar Pandey Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
$~1 to 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: August 23, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6313/2012 RAJ KUMAR JHA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.K.Behera, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 Ms.Megha Bharara, Advocate for Ms.Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate for GNCTD W.P.(C) 6366/2012 RAVINDER KUMAR PANDEY Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.A.K.Behera, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate for R-3 W.P.(C) 6365/2012 RAJVEER SINGH Represented by: W.P.(C) 6313/2012 & connected matters ..... Petitioner versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. Three Original Application Nos.2367/2012, 2368/2012 and 2369/2012 filed by t...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Anita Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. d August, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 99/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Adv. versus ANITA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kr. Jha, Adv. for R-1 to 9. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is directed against the award dated 22.10.2011 passed by the learned Tribunal whereby a compensation of Rs.10,46,394/- was granted in favour of the respondents/claimants with interest @ 7.5 per cent per annum from the date of filing the petition till the date of realization.2. Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued the present appeal only on the ground that the learned Tribunal has awarded a compensation towards loss of love and affection Rs.1.00 lakh and Rs.20,000/- towards funeral expenses, as non pecuniary damages on the higher side.3. Learned counsel has fairly conceded that he is no...
inderjeet Singh Vs. Central Public Information Officer, Ncdrc and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:23. 08.2013 W.P.(C) No.5232/2013 INDERJEET SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person versus CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, NCDRC & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court applied to CPIO of the National Consumer Redressal Commission seeking certain information. The said application was responded by the CPIO on 2.4.2012. The queries of the petitioner and their respective replies given by CPIO read as under: Question Reply 1.Can a Third Party inspect the file in a Inspection of records in pursuance of Regulation no.22 of DECIDED case of a petition, Revision Consumer Protection Regulation, 2005 is permissible only to Petition, Review Petition the parties (parties in dispute or their agents), Regulation 22 of the Consumer Protection reproduced hereunder: Inspection of records Parties (Parties in dispute) or their agents...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Sunita Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. d August, 2013 % + MAC.APP. 25/2012 & CM No.269/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Adv. versus SUNITA DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajender Kumar, Adv. for R-1 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 1.10.2011 whereby the learned Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.11,72,800/- as compensation.2. The counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has argued the instant appeal on the following grounds: b) Because the Tribunal has failed to appreciate that it was not a case of sole negligence of respondent No.5 which is clear from the time and date of accident and the site plan which shows that the accident has taken place as red light and it is due the negligence of deceased himself who hit the vehicle on back side. c) Because the Tribunal has passed the award against its own...
Sunita Devi and ors Vs. New India Assurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. d August, 2013 + MAC.APP. 1056/2012 % SUNITA DEVI & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Vaidant Chadha, Proxy counsel. versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajender Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is filed for enhancement of the award amount granted by the learned Tribunal vide order dated 1.10.2011. The counsel for the appellant has argued that on non-pecuniary benefits the learned Tribunal has granted compensation on a very lower side.2. Learned counsel further submits that compensation for loss of consortium has been granted Rs.10,000/-, compensation for funeral expenses Rs.5,000/- and compensation for loss of love and affection Rs.20,000/-.3. Counsel for the appellant has relied upon the judgement of the Honble Supreme Court in Rajesh & Ors. Vs. Rajbir Singh & Ors. 2013 (6) SCALE 56 whereby the Honble Supreme Court has awar...
Union of India and anr Vs. Foregewell Engineering Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d August, 2013 % + RFA 259/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Adv. Versus FOREGEWELL ENGINEERING CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This first appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 03.01.2011 of the Court of Additional District Judge (Central)-17, Delhi of dismissal of Suit No.284/2009 filed by the appellant / plaintiff for recovery of Rs.12,00,889/- from the respondent / defendant along with pendente lite and future interest.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and the Trial Court record requisitioned. The notice sent to the respondent / defendant was returned with the endorsement of the respondent / defendant having left the address given in the memorandum of appeal. RFA No.259/2011 attempts for service of the respondent / defendant also failed, ultimately vide order dated 29.05.2013, the respondent / de...
Shree Nath Singh and ors Vs. Food CorporatoIn of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3256/2010, W.P.(C) 4891/2008, W.P.(C) 865/2010 23rd August, 2013 % + WP(C) 3256/2010 & CM Nos. 6507/10, 6777/10 & 7431/10 (i.5) FCI HANDLING WORKERS UNION Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Chandan Kumar and Mr. Eklavya, Advocates. Versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Om Prakash Adv. for R-2 & 3. Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikas Kumar, and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advs. for R-4. + W.P.(C) 4891/2008 & CM No. 9394/2008 (Stay) (i.3) SHREE NATH SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. versus FOOD CORPORATOIN OF INDIA & ORS Through: WPC Nos. 3256/2010, 4891/2008, 865/2010 ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 865/2010 & CM Nos.1822/2010 & 5309/2010 (i.4) BABU RAM NAYAK & OTHERS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUMMANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS. ..... Res...
Babu Ram Nayak and Others Vs. Food Corporation of India Through Its Ch ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3256/2010, W.P.(C) 4891/2008, W.P.(C) 865/2010 23rd August, 2013 % + WP(C) 3256/2010 & CM Nos. 6507/10, 6777/10 & 7431/10 (i.5) FCI HANDLING WORKERS UNION Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Chandan Kumar and Mr. Eklavya, Advocates. Versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Om Prakash Adv. for R-2 & 3. Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikas Kumar, and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advs. for R-4. + W.P.(C) 4891/2008 & CM No. 9394/2008 (Stay) (i.3) SHREE NATH SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. versus FOOD CORPORATOIN OF INDIA & ORS Through: WPC Nos. 3256/2010, 4891/2008, 865/2010 ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 865/2010 & CM Nos.1822/2010 & 5309/2010 (i.4) BABU RAM NAYAK & OTHERS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUMMANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS. ..... Res...
Anita Ghosh Vs. Shri Ram College of Commerce and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) Nos. 2846/1996 & 4896/1997 % 23rd August1. W.P.(C) 2846/1996 (I j) ANITA GHOSH Through: ......Petitioner Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Mr. D.S.V.Krishnajee, Mr. Atanu Mukherjee and Ms. Sushma, Advs. VERSUS SHRI RAM COLLEGE OF COMMERCE & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Bansal and Mr. Ritika Nagpal, Adv. for R-3/SRCC (college) Mr. Arun Kumar Verma, Adv. for R4. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Mamta Tiwari and Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocates for R/UGC.2. W.P.(C) 4896/1997 (i.k) KULJEET KAUR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Arun Kumar Varma, Adv. VERSUS UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. A.P.S.Ahulawalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.S.Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Sushma , Adv. for R-4. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Mamta Tiwari and Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocates for R/UGC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Both these connected writ petitions are being disposed of by ...
M/S. Smcc Construction India Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on : Judgment pronounced on: + 10th July23. d August, 2013 W.P.(C) No.2250/2012 M/S. SMCC CONSTRUCTION INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nageshwar Rao with Ms. Sayaree B. Malik, Advocates versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX ... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. The petitioner by way of the present writ petition has challenged order dated 15.03.2012 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax ===================================================================== W.P.(C) 2250/2012 Page 1 of 12 disposing of the objections filed by the petitioner against issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as (the Act) and the very issuance of the notice dated 15.03.2012.2. The assessment year in issue is 2002-03.3. The petitioner is an Indian company engaged ...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »