Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Fci Handling Workers Union Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 3256/2010, W.P.(C) 4891/2008, W.P.(C) 865/2010 23rd August, 2013 % + WP(C) 3256/2010 & CM Nos. 6507/10, 6777/10 & 7431/10 (i.5) FCI HANDLING WORKERS UNION Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Chandan Kumar and Mr. Eklavya, Advocates. Versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Om Prakash Adv. for R-2 & 3. Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikas Kumar, and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advs. for R-4. + W.P.(C) 4891/2008 & CM No. 9394/2008 (Stay) (i.3) SHREE NATH SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. versus FOOD CORPORATOIN OF INDIA & ORS Through: WPC Nos. 3256/2010, 4891/2008, 865/2010 ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 865/2010 & CM Nos.1822/2010 & 5309/2010 (i.4) BABU RAM NAYAK & OTHERS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Arvind Nayar and Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Zartab Anwar, Advocates. Versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUMMANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS. ..... Res...
Krishak Bharati Cooperative Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
$~Part IIB (R-32 &33) * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL NOS. 84/2000 & 85/2000 Date of decision:23. d August, 2013 KRISHAK BHARATI COOPERATIVE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rajat Navet, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANOATHER ..... Respondents Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel & Mr. Ruchesh Sinha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner, a multi-State Cooperative Society, has filed two appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short), which relate to Assessment Years 1987-88 and 1988-89. By order dated 7th November, 2000, the following two substantial questions of law were admitted for hearing:(1) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case an amount of Rs.1,88,17,168/- was deductible from the petitioners income as a deduction, by virtue of Section 36(1)(iii), on account of interest accrued in respect of capita...
S. Raju Aiyer Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru University and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 08.2013 LPA 330/2013 S. RAJU AIYER .... Appellant versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Ms S. Janani. For the Respondents : Mr Mohinder J.S. Rupal. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.The present appeal impugns the order dated 13.03.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C)2541/2011. The learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant whereby the appellant had, inter-alia, challenged the punitive measure of compulsory retirement imposed on the appellant on account of him being found guilty of sexual harassment.2. It is contended before us that the findings of guilt returned by the Enquiry Committee, Disciplinary Authority and the Appeals Committee are based on no evidence and are, thus, perverse. It is also...
Union of India Vs. Hardev Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :19. 08.2013 Judgment pronounced on :23. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 3444/2012 UNION OF INDIA Through: versus HARDEV SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner None ..... Respondent Mr. P. Narula, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.Vide application filed on 27.9.2011, the respondent sought certain information from PIO of the Ministry of External Affairs, Regional Passport Office, Bhikaji Cama Palace, New Delhi with respect to passport number B 5131321 issued to one Shri Beant Singh on 28.6.2001. The said application was replied by the CPIO on 9.11.2011. The following were the queries and their replies: SI. Queries Reply 1. Name and details of the person to whom Beant Singh s/o Sukhwinder Singh file passport no. B 5131321 was issued from no. BO4899/01 Delhi Passport Office on 28.6.2001 2. Photocopies of all the documents submitted as proof of address and identity on the basis on which the passport was issued.3. Whether ...
Shri Rajan Sharma Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 08.2013 LPA No.300/2013 & CM No.7637/2013 SHRI RAJAN SHARMA ..... Appellant . Respondents versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondents : Mr Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr R. K. Saini. : Mr V.S.R. Krishna with Mr Abhishek Yadav for R-1 and 2. Mr Sibo Sankar Mishra with Mr A. Pathak for R-3. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.The present appeal impugns the order dated 04.03.2013 passed by a Single Judge of this court in writ petition being W.P.(C) No.1761/2012. The learned Single Judge has interpreted the provisions of Sections 5, 7 and 10 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred as the Act) and held that as per the said provisions, a person who has completed his term as a member of the Railway Claims Tribunal would not be eligible for being appointe...
D.V.Gautam Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 12, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: August 23, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7447/2008 D.V.GAUTAM Represented by: .....Petitioner Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On July 31, 1996, a police team comprising Inspector R.P.Tyagi, SI D.V.Gautam i.e. the petitioner, SI Shashi, HC Attar Chaudhary, HC Suresh Chand, Const.Naresh and Lady Const.Raj Kumari conducted a raid at Kashish Banquet Hall, Vikas Marg, New Delhi and claimed that six persons named Raghubir Singh, Sukhmal Jain, P.M.Mahesh, Lata, Alka and Reshma, were found there, involved in prostitution. Accordingly, FIR No.260/1996 for offences punishable under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act, 1956 was registered against said persons and t...
M/S Kelvinator of India Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 08.2013 W.P.(C) 1113/1991 M/s KELVINATOR OF INDIA LTD. ... Petitioner versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Ajay Vohra with Ms Kavita Jha and Mr Vaibhav Kulkarni : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr Standing Counsel CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACJ 1.The only issue which arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether the petitioner is entitled to waiver of interest levied under section 215 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The petitioner had moved an application for waiver of interest under Rule 40 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the said Rules) which had been rejected by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax by an order dated Nil communicated through letter dated 07....
Kuljeet Kaur Vs. University of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) Nos. 2846/1996 & 4896/1997 % 23rd August1. W.P.(C) 2846/1996 (I j) ANITA GHOSH Through: ......Petitioner Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Mr. D.S.V.Krishnajee, Mr. Atanu Mukherjee and Ms. Sushma, Advs. VERSUS SHRI RAM COLLEGE OF COMMERCE & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Bansal and Mr. Ritika Nagpal, Adv. for R-3/SRCC (college) Mr. Arun Kumar Verma, Adv. for R4. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Mamta Tiwari and Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocates for R/UGC.2. W.P.(C) 4896/1997 (i.k) KULJEET KAUR Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Arun Kumar Varma, Adv. VERSUS UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. A.P.S.Ahulawalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.S.Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Sushma , Adv. for R-4. Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Ms. Mamta Tiwari and Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocates for R/UGC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Both these connected writ petitions are being disposed of by ...
Rajveer Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
$~1 to 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: August 23, 2013 + W.P.(C) 6313/2012 RAJ KUMAR JHA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.A.K.Behera, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 Ms.Megha Bharara, Advocate for Ms.Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate for GNCTD W.P.(C) 6366/2012 RAVINDER KUMAR PANDEY Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.A.K.Behera, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate for R-3 W.P.(C) 6365/2012 RAJVEER SINGH Represented by: W.P.(C) 6313/2012 & connected matters ..... Petitioner versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. Three Original Application Nos.2367/2012, 2368/2012 and 2369/2012 filed by t...
Raghubir Dhawan Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
#26 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5212/2013 RAGHUBIR DHAWAN Through ..... Petitioner Ms. Sumita Rani Sharma with Mr. Banamali Shukla, Advocates versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through Ms. Shobhna Takiar with Ms. Ritagya Riti, Advocates Date of Decision:23. d August, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CM APPL. 11715/2013 in W.P.(C) 5212/2013 Keeping in view the averments in the application, delay in re-filing the petition is condoned. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 5212/2013 1. Present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution praying for allotment of a flat to the petitioner under New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979 (HUDCO).2. The relevant facts of the present case are that in September 1979 petitioner deposited with SBI an amount of Rs. 250/- as demanded by the DDA for registration under New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979.3. In 2012 that pe...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »