Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rani Devi and ors Vs. D.T.C. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6749/2012 Decided on 26th August, 2013 RANI DEVI AND ORS Through ..... Petitioners : Mr. Sudhansu Palo, Adv. versus D.T.C. AND ANR. Through ..... Respondents : Ms. Manisha Tyagi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Petitioners are legal representatives of Late Shri Mam Chand workman, who was working as a Bus Conductor with the respondents right from 1976. Workman died during the proceedings before Labour Court and the petitioners were brought on record.2. Workman raised an industrial dispute with the labour department, which was referred to Labour Court by the Secretary (Labour), Government of N.C.T. of Delhi with the following terms of reference:Whether the punishment order of removal of Sh. Mam Chand from his service imposed by the management vide order dated 1.7.92 is illegal and unjustified and if so, to what relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect? 3. Workman w...
Revti Devi Vs. Ndmc and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (C) No.769/2013 REVTI DEVI Through ..... Petitioner Ms. Rani Chhabra, Advocate. versus NDMC & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Dr. Ritu Bhardwaj, Additional Standing Counsel, NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.1. This Writ petition has been filed by Ms. Revti Devi praying that the impugned order issued by the Section Officer, (Enforcement), NDMC, on 8th January, 2013 be quashed. By that order, the NDMC withdrew and cancelled a previous order dated 16th June, 2011 permitting the petitioner to change the trade which she was plying at a Tehbazari site, from that of pressing clothes, to that of, Pan Biri Cigarette. The sole ground for the impugned order was that, upon reconsideration, the NDMC has concluded that the relevant Resolution No.28, dated 10th November, 1989, of the NDMC permits only a change of, trade, whereas the petitioners activity, as originally permitted, amounts to a, vo...
Union of India Thr Department of Customs Vs. Yuil Measures (India) Lim ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO. APP. 58/2013 UNION OF INDIA THR DEPARTMENT OF CUSTOMS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate. versus YUIL MEASURES (INDIA) LIMITED & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.CM No.12925/2013 Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM No.12923/2013 This is an application praying for condonation of 69 days delay in filing the appeal. Delay condoned. Application stands disposed of. CO. APP. 58/2013 and CM No.12924/2013 (stay) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26th April, 2013 passed by the learned Company Judge in CA Nos.910/2008 and 1297/2008. The first application (CA No.910/2008) was filed by the Appellant (Customs Department) seeking the setting aside of the auction sale of the capital goods and raw materials belonging to M/s. Yuil Measure...
Gurbachan Singh @ Pyare Lal Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 246/2003 Date of Decision:26. h August1. GURBACHAN SINGH @ PYARE LAL 2.BALDEV SINGH @ BALDEV RAJ ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Gurbaksh Singh, Advocate with appellants in person. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. P.K. Sharma, Standing Counsel for CBI. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. The appellant Gurbachan Singh and Baldev Singh have preferred the present appeal against the judgment dated 27 th February, 2003 and order on sentence dated 28th February, 2003 vide which the appellants were convicted for offences under Section 120 B IPC, Section 25(1AA) of Arms Act r/w Section 120B IPC and under Section 5 of Explosives Substances Act r/w Section 120 B IPC and wee sentenced as under:(i) Rigorous imprisonment for 10 years with fine of Rs.5,000/- under Section 120B IPC, Section 25 (1AA) of Arms Act r/w Section 120 B IPC and under Section 5 of Explosives Substances Act r/w Section 120 B...
Rajesh Anand Vs. Industrial Development Bank of India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h August, 2013 % + RFA No.287/2013 RAJESH ANAND Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Akhilendra Narayan Singh, Adv. Versus INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 20.04.2013 (in CS No.248/2011) on admissions of the Court of Additional District Judge (Central)-09, Delhi directing the appellant to make payment to the respondent / plaintiff of 11 installments of Rs.15,330/- per month.2. The suit from which this appeal arises was filed by the respondent / plaintiff against the appellant / defendant for recovery of Rs.4,55,362.62p together with interest thereon at the rate of 36% per annum till realization, pleading: (i) that the appellant / defendant was the borrower of the respondent / plaintiff and had availed loan facility from the respondent / plaintiff under the Per...
Deepak Thirwani and anr Vs. Lachman Das Mansharmani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: August 07, 2013 Judgment pronounced on: August 26, 2013 + C.R.P. No.36/2013 DEEPAK THIRWANI AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Rajesh Banati, Adv. with Ms.Manisha Yadav, Adv. versus LACHMAN DAS MANSHARMANI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Gulab Rai Chabria, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition is filed against the order dated 22nd December, 2012 passed in Civil Suit No.51/2012 whereby the learned Civil Judge dismissed the application filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs under Order XII, Rule 6 CPC.2. Undisputed facts between the parties are that the petitioners are the joint owners of the property bearing No.4/19, Ground Floor, Vikram Vihar, Lajpat Nagar-IV, New Delhi (in short, called the Suit Property) by virtue of a registered sale deed dated 17th June, 2011. When the said property was purchased, the respondent was already a tenant of ground floor in the suit property wh...
Facebook India Online Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mufty Aijas Arshad Qasmi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: August 26, 2013 + C.R.P. No.78/2012 & C.M. No.7471/2013 FACEBOOK INDIA ONLINE SERVICES PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Prag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Tejas Karia, Ms.Suman Kutreji, Ms. Bahaar Dhawan & Mr.Nitish Goel, Advs. versus MUFTY AIJAS ARSHAD QASMI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Shaildendra Singh, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Akhil Anand, Adv. with Mr.Praveen Sehraat, Adv. for R-3 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. By way of the present petition under Section 115 of CPC, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 30th May, 2012 whereby an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for deletion of its name from the array of parties in a suit filed by the respondent No.1 was dismissed.2. Respondent No.1 filed a suit against the petitioner and other parties who are the defendants in the main suit therein for permanent and mandatory injunction seeking that the Defendants may be directed to remo...
Mohinder Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.234/2000 Date of decision:26. h August, 2013 % MOHINDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Anil Gautam, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. By way of the instant writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the legality of the order dated 9th March, 1999 and sentence imposed by the Summary Security Force Court (SSFC) whereby the petitioner was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment as well as dismissal from service.2. There is no dispute to the facts giving rise to the petition. The petitioner joined the Border Security Force (BSF) in the year 1984 and was promoted thereafter as Lance Naik, Naik and Head Constable. He had an unblemished record of service and was rewarded with good entries in his service book as well as cash rewards by his superiors on 10 occasions.3. In January, 1999, ...
Smt. Mamta Chaturvedi Vs. the Management of New Greenfield Public Scho ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No. 2748/1999 26th August , 2013 % SMT. MAMTA CHATURVEDI Through: ......Petitioner None. VERSUS THE MANAGEMENT OF NEW GREENFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. ...... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner prays for a direction that she be permitted to join duties with the respondent No.1-school and she should be paid salary at the same rates as being paid in the schools run by the Delhi Administration.2. Petitioner was appointed as a language teacher on 7.12.1991. From 1.4.1999 petitioner was asked not to perform her duties i.e petitioners services are said to have been terminated w.e.f 1.4.1999.3. A reading of the counter-affidavit filed by the respondent No.1 shows that appointment of the petitioner in the year 1991 is not disputed. Two defences are raised in the counter-affidavit. First is that the respondent...
Sanatan Dharam Mandir Society Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h August, 2013 % + RFA No.753/2010 SANATAN DHARAM MANDIR SOCIETY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anand Yadav & Ms. Anita Tomar, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 30.07.2010 of the Court of Additional District Judge-17 (Central), Delhi of dismissal of suit No.590/2008 filed by the appellant / plaintiff.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and the Trial Court record requisitioned. Though the Union of India (UOI) through Ministry of Defence, Director General Defence Estates and Defence Estates Officer were already before this Court as respondents / defendants but an application was filed by the Director General, National Security Guards (NSG), Palam for impleadment in the present appeal claiming that certain portions of the land subject matter of this appeal had be...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »