Delhi Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.S.K Sood Vs. Vir Surinder Beri and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.A. No. 20366/2011in CS(OS) 1386/2011 Reserved on:13. h August, 2013 Decided on:26. h August, 2013 % V.S.K SOOD Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. B.S. Bagga and Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocates. versus VIR SURINDER BERI & ORS Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Jatin Sehgal, Advocate for Defendant Nos. 1, 3, 4 and 5. Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for Defendant No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By this application the Defendant No. 1 seeks return of the Plaint and dismissal of the suit under Order VII Rule 10 and 11 CPC on account of not affixing the requisite court fees.2. Learned counsel for the applicant/Defendant No. 1 contends that during the lifetime of the parents itself a Memorandum of Understanding dated 13th August, 1988 had been arrived at between the parties whereby the properties were mutually divided between the Plaintiff, Defendant No. 5 and Sukhdev Beri who is now represented through the legal heirs of Defendant No.2. By the present...
Alfred George Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :26. h August, 2013 + CRL.A. 1161/2011 & Crl.M.A.No.10514/2013 ALFRED GEORGE ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey with Mr.A.K.Sahu and Mr.Nitin Saluja, Advocates. VERSUS STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Alfred George (the appellant) impugns a judgment dated 20.07.2011 in Sessions Case No.123/2009 arising out of FIR No.194/2008 registered at Police Station Sarojini Nagar by which he was convicted for committing offences punishable under Section 420/471 IPC and Section 14 Foreigners Act. By an order dated 23.07.2011, he was sentenced to undergo RI for five years with fine `5,000/- under Section 420 IPC; RI for two years with fine of `2,000/- under Section 471 IPC and RI for three years with fine `5,000/- under Section 14 Foreigners Act. All the sentenced were ordered to run consecutively in respect of the offences proved against ...
Madan Lal Suryawanshi Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :26. h August, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 1078/2013 MADAN LAL SURYAWANSHI Through : ..... Petitioner Petitioner in person. versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present petition impugning order dated 10.05.2012 of learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby his revision petition being C.R.No.69/12 challenging dismissal order dated 10.10.2011 under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C was dismissed.2. I have heard the petitioner and have examined the trial court record. Only grievance of the petitioner is that the trial court did not direct the police to investigate his complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. His plea is that the matter requires investigation through police as he is unable to collect and produce the evidence. The complaint case filed by him discloses commission of cognizable offences by the respondents.3. The petitioner filed a complai...
Mehar Singh Loh and ors Vs. Airport Authority of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 08.2013 LPA 613/2013 MEHAR SINGH LOH & ORS ..... Appellants versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Sanjay Sharawat and Mr Ankit Gyan. For the Respondent : Digvijay Rai, Standing Counsel for R-1/AAI. Ms Jhum Jhum Sarkar, Advocate for R-3. Mr Arun Birbal, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACJ (ORAL) CM No.12866/2013 (Exemption) The exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. LPA 613/2013 & CM No.12865/2013 (Directions) This appeal is directed against the order dated 15.07.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.340/2013. In the writ petition, the appellants/petitioners had sought the following reliefs:(a) LPA 613/2013 Issue a Writ of Certiorari and quash impugned order dated (b) Issue a Writ of Ma...
Essel Sports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:12. 08.2013 % + Order delivered on:26. 08.2013 CS(OS) 1566/2007 ESSEL SPORTS PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Plaintiff Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, Mr. Sudeep Chatterjee and Mr. Tejveer Bhatia, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Jatan Singh, CGSC for defendants No. 1 to 3. Mr. Amit Sibal, Ms. Radha Rangaswamy & Mr. Prateek Chadha, Advocates for defendant No.5. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI ORDER VIPIN SANGHI, J.I.A. No. 15100/2012 1. This application has been preferred by defendant No.5 under Order XI read with Section 151 CPC for seeking leave to answer interrogatories contained in Form No.2 under Appendix C of the CPC, which are filed along with the application, and for a further direction that the said interrogatories be answered on oath by the plaintiff within the time prescribed under Rule 1 of Order XI CPC. The stage at which the present application has been filed by the applicant/defendant...
Rakesh @ Bengali Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : July 12, 2013 DECIDED ON : August 26, 2013 + CRL.A. 188/2012 RAKESH @ BENGALI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Avninder Singh with Mr.Aditya Vaibhav Singh, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Rakesh @ Bengali (the appellant) challenges a judgment dated 07.03.2011 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.113/2010 arising out of FIR No.281/2007 by which he was convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC. By an order dated 01.04.2011 he was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years with fine `2,000/-.2. Daily Diary (DD) No.24 PP Inder Lok (Ex.PW4/A) was recorded at 10.35 P.M. on getting information that PCR had caught hold an individual with a knife. The investigation was assigned to ASI Ram Kishan who with Ct.Chand Singh went to the spot. Rakesh @ Be...
Sudhir Gupta Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 07, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: August 26, 2013 + (1) CRL.M.C. No.6620/2006 SUDHIR GUPTA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal and Mr. Abhishek Mohan Sinha, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. Through: + (2) .....Respondents Mr. Neeraj Malhotra and Ms. Prithu Garg, Advocates for Respondent-SEBI CRL.M.C. No.7487/2006 P.R. MEHTA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal and Mr. Abhishek Mohan Sinha, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. Through: + (3) .....Respondents Mr. Neeraj Malhotra and Ms. Prithu Garg, Advocates for Respondent-SEBI CRL.M.C. No.159/2007 PRAKASH GUPTA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal and Mr. Abhishek Mohan Sinha, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. Crl.M.Cs.6620/06; 7487/06 & 159/07 .....Respondents Page 1 of 11 Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra and Ms. Prithu Garg, Advocates for SEBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT Since in the above-captioned three petitions, quashing of Criminal ...
Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Vs. Daelim Industrial Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EFA(OS) 31/2009 NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Avneesh Garg and Mr. Parijat Sinha, Advocates. versus DAELIM INDUSTRIAL CO. LTD. Through: % ..... Respondent Mr. Dharmendra Rautray and Ms. Tara Shahani, Advocates. Date of Decision : August 26, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. This Appeal under Order XXI read with Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966 is directed against the order dated 29.7.2009 passed in Execution Petition No.242/2008 and order dated 7.8.2009 passed in E.A. No.415/2009 in Execution Petition No.242/2008.2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts are that an award dated 23rd September, 2000 was made in the dispute between the Decree Holder (Respondent herein) and the Judgment Debtor (Appellant herein). The Arbitrators by a majority of 2:1 awarded the following sums to the Respondent:...
Prakash Gupta Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: August 07, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: August 26, 2013 + (1) CRL.M.C. No.6620/2006 SUDHIR GUPTA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal and Mr. Abhishek Mohan Sinha, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. Through: + (2) .....Respondents Mr. Neeraj Malhotra and Ms. Prithu Garg, Advocates for Respondent-SEBI CRL.M.C. No.7487/2006 P.R. MEHTA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal and Mr. Abhishek Mohan Sinha, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. Through: + (3) .....Respondents Mr. Neeraj Malhotra and Ms. Prithu Garg, Advocates for Respondent-SEBI CRL.M.C. No.159/2007 PRAKASH GUPTA Through: .....Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal and Mr. Abhishek Mohan Sinha, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. Crl.M.Cs.6620/06; 7487/06 & 159/07 .....Respondents Page 1 of 11 Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra and Ms. Prithu Garg, Advocates for SEBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT Since in the above-captioned three petitions, quashing of Criminal ...
Mohd. Yunus Qureshi Vs. Zikru Rehman Khan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h August, 2013. + RFA 221/2013 & CM No.7260/2013 (for stay) MOHD. YUNUS QURESHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.V. Singh, Adv. Versus ZIKRU REHMAN KHAN Through: ..... Respondent Mr. S.P. Singh Choudhary and Mr. Y.R. Shama, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.CM No.7262/2013 (of appellant for condonation of 26 days delay in filing the appeal) 1. The counsel for the respondent has stated that if the appeal is heard today itself, he will not oppose this application.2. The counsel for the appellant states that he is ready to argue the appeal.3. Though this is first appeal and notice only of this application for condonation of delay was issued and the notice of the appeal even has not been issued as yet and appeal not admitted for hearing and the Trial Court record not requisitioned, but considering the argument raised by the counsel for the appellant, need is not felt to postpone the he...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »