Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Basanti Bose Vs. S.K.Bose
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h July, 2013 % + RFA 65/2013 & CM No.1718/2013 (for stay). BASANTI BOSE Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anisha Upadhyay, Adv. versus S.K.BOSE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Arjun Mitra, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The Trial Court record has been received.2. Though the appeal has not been formally admitted for hearing as yet but considering the nature of the controversy, with the consent of the counsels the appeal has been finally heard.3. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 14 th September, 2012 of the Court of Addl. District Judge-03, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi of dismissal of suit No.185/2010 filed by the appellant/plaintiff for the reason of the appellant/plaintiff, inspite of onus of the main issue being on her having not led any evidence inspite of several opportunities.4. Thus the scope of the present appeal is confined to whether the learned Addl. Dis...
The Bihar State Electricity Board Vs. the Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:30. 07.2013 CM Nos.11667/2012, 572/2013 in WP(C) No.4867/2012 GRIDCO LTD Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Soli J.Sorabjee, Senior Advocate with Mr.R.K.Mehta, Mr. Antaryami Upadhyaya and Mr. Premjit Elangbam, Advocates. versus STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr. G.E.Vahanvati, Attorney General Mr. S.B.Upadhyay, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Mr. Anupam Prasad & Ms. Tara Narula, Advs. CM No.12129/2012 WP(C) No.5396/2012 WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COM. LTD AND ANR. Through : ..... Petitioners Mr. Upamanyu Hazarika, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sakya Sinha Chaudhari and Ms. Prerna Priyadarshini, Advs. versus CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ORS. Through : ..... Respondents Mr. G.E.Vahanvati, Attorney General, Mr. S.B.Upadhyay, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Mr. Anupam Prasad & Ms. Tara Narula, Advs. CM 11667/12, 572/13 in WP(C) 4867/1...
Ramesh Chand Arora Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 3835/2010 30th July, 2013 RAMESH CHAND ARORA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Jitender Ratta, Adv. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Ms. Deepa Rai, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, petitioner Sh. Ramesh Chand Arora , who had worked as a Consultant with the respondent no.2, claims higher emoluments during the period for which he served with the respondent no.2. Higher emoluments are claimed on the ground that petitioner has not been paid as per recommendation of the 6th Pay Commission and which amounts are being paid to the person who has subsequently to the petitioner been appointed by respondent no.2 as its consultant.2. The appointment letter of the petitioner shows that petitioner has to be paid salary as per the rules of the Government of India. In the writ petition, no cause of action is laid...
Mrs. Rajeshwari Vidhyarthi Vs. Vijaya Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: July 30, 2013 + CM(M) No.760/2013 MRS. RAJESHWARI VIDHYARTHI ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Madhu Mukul Tripathi, Adv. versus VIJAYA BANK ..... Respondent Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) CM No.11623/2013 & CM No.11624/2013 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. CM(M) No.760/2013 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 151 CPC for setting aside the impugned order dated 9th April, 2013 and 3rd January, 2013.2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent. She stated in the suit that she is the resident of property bearing No.75, South Anarkali, Khureji Khas, Delhi-51. She is the proprietor of M/s.Russo Foods India who is engaged in export of processed food like frozen meat and processed food, cereal...
Standard Microsystems India Private Limited Vs. --
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h July, 2013 + COMPANY PETITION NO.140/2013 STANDARD MICROSYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Sabharwal, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Pradhan, Dy. Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the Official Liquidator CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR R. V. EASWAR, J.: (ORAL) 1. This is a second motion petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation (Scheme) among Standard Microsystems India Private Limited (hereafter referred to as Petitioner Transferor company 2), Bridgeco Technologies India Private Limited (hereafter referred to as Transferor company1) and Microchip Technology (Inida) Private Limited (hereafter referred to as Transferee company). A copy of the Scheme has been enclosed with the petition.2. The registered office of the Petitioner Transferor company 2 is situated within t...
M/S Alfa Tyre Vs. M/S Techno Tyre India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:30. h July, 2013 % + CM(M) No.757/2013 M/S ALFA TYRE Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Adv. versus M/S TECHNO TYRE INDIA Through None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.11614/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) No.757/2013 & C.M. No.11613/2013 (for stay) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 14 th March, 2013 dismissing the petitioners application under Order VI, Rule 17 CPC seeking amendment in the written statement in a suit for recovery of `6,10,393.27/filed by the respondent against the petitioner arising out of commercial transactions between the two parties. The petitioner is the defendant in the suit.2. In the written statement, the petitioner denied the claim of the respondent on ground that the co...
Rajesh Kumar Gupta Vs. Pratap Builders and Contractors (P) Ltd. and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h July, 2013 % + RFA 260/2003, CM No.590/2003 (u/O 4.R-27), CM No.10986/2010 (u/O 1.R-2) & CM No.23178/2010 (u/S 15.CPC). RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Girish Aggarwal, Adv. versus PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) LTD. & ANR. .... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajinder Wali, Adv. for R-2. AND + RFA 275/2003, CM No.623/2003 (for filing addl. Documents) & CM No.6198/2011 (for taking affidavit on record). MAHABIR PARSAD GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Girish Aggarwal, Adv. versus PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) & ANR Through AND + ..... Respondents RFA 297/2003 G.K.JAIN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sunil Lalwani, Adv. versus PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) LTD.& ANR. Through AND RFAs No.260/2003, 275/2003 , 297/2003 & 778/2003 + RFA 778/2003 SHAIL BALA Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Sunil Lalwani, Adv. PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RA...
Gridco Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:30. 07.2013 CM Nos.11667/2012, 572/2013 in WP(C) No.4867/2012 GRIDCO LTD Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Soli J.Sorabjee, Senior Advocate with Mr.R.K.Mehta, Mr. Antaryami Upadhyaya and Mr. Premjit Elangbam, Advocates. versus STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr. G.E.Vahanvati, Attorney General Mr. S.B.Upadhyay, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Mr. Anupam Prasad & Ms. Tara Narula, Advs. CM No.12129/2012 WP(C) No.5396/2012 WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COM. LTD AND ANR. Through : ..... Petitioners Mr. Upamanyu Hazarika, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sakya Sinha Chaudhari and Ms. Prerna Priyadarshini, Advs. versus CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ORS. Through : ..... Respondents Mr. G.E.Vahanvati, Attorney General, Mr. S.B.Upadhyay, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Mr. Anupam Prasad & Ms. Tara Narula, Advs. CM 11667/12, 572/13 in WP(C) 4867/1...
Mahabir Parsad Gupta Vs. Pratap Builders and Contractors (P) and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h July, 2013 % + RFA 260/2003, CM No.590/2003 (u/O 4.R-27), CM No.10986/2010 (u/O 1.R-2) & CM No.23178/2010 (u/S 15.CPC). RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Girish Aggarwal, Adv. versus PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) LTD. & ANR. .... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajinder Wali, Adv. for R-2. AND + RFA 275/2003, CM No.623/2003 (for filing addl. Documents) & CM No.6198/2011 (for taking affidavit on record). MAHABIR PARSAD GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Girish Aggarwal, Adv. versus PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) & ANR Through AND + ..... Respondents RFA 297/2003 G.K.JAIN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sunil Lalwani, Adv. versus PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) LTD.& ANR. Through AND RFAs No.260/2003, 275/2003 , 297/2003 & 778/2003 + RFA 778/2003 SHAIL BALA Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Sunil Lalwani, Adv. PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RA...
Gurpreet Singh Vs. State Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL.) 1561/2012 Date of Decision:30. h July, 2013 GURPREET SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Khushbir Singh, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Saleem Ahmed ASC with Ms. Charu Dalal, Advocate ASI Raj Kumar, PS Narela CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuing direction in the form of mandamus to the respondent to register FIR against the persons named in complaint dated 9 th July, 2012.2. Briefly stated the factual matrix of the case is:The original allottee Manglu Ram is the bona fide allottee of property bearing No.16, Pocket-06, Sector-A/10, Narela as per the Demand Draft-cum-Allotment Letter issued in the year 1992. It was revealed to Manglu Ram after perusing the record of DDA that DDA received a letter on behalf of original allottee Manglu Ram on 7th April, 1993 where a person had ap...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »