Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Sanatan Dharam Sabha, Shahdara
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h July, 2013 % + RFA 251/2004, CM No.6378/2004 (for stay) & CM No.7170/2006 (u/O 4.R-27 CPC) MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Amita Gupta, Adv. Versus SANATAN DHARAM SABHA, SHAHDARA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.N. Gupta, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 29 th November, 2003 of the Additional District Judge (ADJ) against the appellant Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), of possession of portion of property at 531, Sanatan Dharam Senior Secondary School, Bara Bazar, Shahdara, Delhi and for mesne profits/damages for use and occupation @ Rs.5,000/- per month.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and vide ex-parte ad interim order dated 17th May, 2004 the operation of the impugned judgment and decree was stayed. Vide subsequent order, the Trial Court record was requisitioned. Vide yet subsequent order 8th Septembe...
Smt. Prakash Kaur Vs. Asha Chopra and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: July 30, 2013 + RC.REV. NO.319/2012 & CM NO.12121/2012 SMT PRAKASH KAUR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.D.D. Sharma, Adv. Versus ASHA CHOPRA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr.Sunil K. Kalra, Adv. with Mr.Vikram Gola, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The present petition under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25 B of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner/defendant against the eviction order passed against her by the learned trial court on 6th January, 2012.2. It is stated that the father of the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and the husband of the respondent No.6 i.e. Late Sh. Prithvi Raj was the owner of the property bearing No. C-4, Gururamdas Nagar, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi. The said property consists of 4 shops, out of which Shop No. 3 was given on rent to the petitioner. The 3 other shops are let out to other tenants. The suit pre...
Ms. Manju Vs. Balwantray Mehta Vidya Bhawan Sr. Sec. School and
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13270/2009 % 30.07.2013 MS. MANJU ..... Petitioner Through MR. G.D. Bhandari, Mr. Parveen K. Nagpal, Advocates versus BALWANTRAY MEHTA VIDYA BHAWAN SR. SEC. SCHOOL AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Bandana Shukla, Advocate for Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner, who is the wife of late Sh. Om Prakash, seeks compassionate appointment with the respondent No. 2/ Balwantray Mehta Vidya Bhawan Sr. Sec. School.2. Compassionate appointment can only be granted in terms of an applicable policy and on the aspirant satisfying the requirements of the policy. Under certain compassionate policies, there is a quota for appointment and subject to vacancies arising in that quota, appointment can W.P.(C) 13270/2009 Page 1 be made. Also entitlement to compassionate appointment in certain policies is only for...
Mrs.Nirmal Gupta Vs. the Lt.Governor/Administrator Govt.of Nct of Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
$~R-40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: July 30, 2013 + W.P.(C) 7516/2001 MRS.NIRMAL GUPTA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.P.Gupta, Advocate versus THE LT.GOVERNOR/ADMINISTRATOR GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Represented by: None ..... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The issue at hand is short. A select panel for appointment to the post of Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) was prepared in the year 1984 and some appointments were made. Without exhausting the panel another advertisement was issued inviting applications from eligible candidates and at that stage the empanelled candidates who had not been offered appointment approached the Tribunal vide OA No.842/1991 which was disposed of with a direction that all empanelled candidates be offered appointments, with a determinative finding that vacancies existed in the year 1984 for the post of PGT and that the vacancies coul...
M/S Sicpa India Private Ltd. Vs. M/S Brushman (India) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25th July, 2013 Date of Decision:30. h July, 2013 % + CO. PET. No.350/2010 & CO. APPL. No.1590/2010 M/S SICPA INDIA PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.C. Mukund, Mr.Ashok Kumar Jain, Mr.Pankaj Jain & Mr. P.V. Saravanaraja, Advocates. Versus M/S BRUSHMAN (INDIA) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Lakshmi Gurung & Mr.Sujeet Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.: This is a petition filed under sections 433(e), 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act) filed by SICPA India Pvt. Ltd. (the petitioner) seeking winding-up of Brushman (India) Ltd., hereinafter referred to as the respondent or the respondent-company.2. The petition has been filed under the following circumstances. The petitioner advanced a loan of `3 crores in July, 2008 to the respondent against the pledge of shares worth `5.50 crores. The shares belonged to the promoters of the respondent-company. Another loan of `5 crores wa...
Aleem Khan @ Karan Singh Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1330/2012 Reserved on :15. h April, 2013 Date of Decision:30. h July, 2013 % ALEEM KHAN @ KARAN SINGH ....Appellant Through Mr. S.P. Mehta and Mr. Suraj Chaudhary, Advocates. Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 88/2013 KRISHAN SHANKAR BAKDE ....Appellant Through Mr. S.P. Mehta and Mr. Suraj Chaudhary, Advocates. Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.: The present appeal arises out of charge sheet filed in FIR No. 303/2000, Police Station DBG Road, against the two appellants Aleem Khan and Krishna Shankar along with 9 others (excluding 3 who had died). By the impugned judgment dated 25th September, 2012, other accused except Aleem Khan and Krishna Shankar have been acquitted. Aleem Khan has been convicte...
Shail Bala Vs. Pratap Builders and Contractors (P) Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h July, 2013 % + RFA 260/2003, CM No.590/2003 (u/O 4.R-27), CM No.10986/2010 (u/O 1.R-2) & CM No.23178/2010 (u/S 15.CPC). RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Girish Aggarwal, Adv. versus PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) LTD. & ANR. .... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajinder Wali, Adv. for R-2. AND + RFA 275/2003, CM No.623/2003 (for filing addl. Documents) & CM No.6198/2011 (for taking affidavit on record). MAHABIR PARSAD GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Girish Aggarwal, Adv. versus PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) & ANR Through AND + ..... Respondents RFA 297/2003 G.K.JAIN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sunil Lalwani, Adv. versus PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) LTD.& ANR. Through AND RFAs No.260/2003, 275/2003 , 297/2003 & 778/2003 + RFA 778/2003 SHAIL BALA Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Sunil Lalwani, Adv. PRATAP BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS (P) LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RA...
Uco Bank Vs. Ram Prakash Kakkar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h July, 2013 % + RFA 325/2013 UCO BANK Through: .....Appellant Mr. Dilip Agarwal, Adv. Versus RAM PRAKASH KAKKAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Tara Chand Gupta. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This first appeal impugns the judgment and decree, dated 10.04.2013 of the Additional District Judge (Central)-17, Delhi in Suit No.315 of 2011 (Unique ID No.02401C1204902008) filed by the respondents, against the appellant Bank for ejectment of the appellant Bank from the premises earlier in its tenancy under the respondents and for mesne profits; the appellant during the pendency of the suit agreed to vacate the premises and to hand over vacant, peaceful physical possession thereof to the respondents on or before 31.12.2010 and the suit continued qua the claim of the respondents for mesne profits only; the impugned judgment and decree is for recovery of mesne profits / damages for use and ...
Jai Prakash Vs. School Management of Itl Public School and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6789/2012 and CM 17776/2012 % 30.07.2013 JAI PRAKASH ..... Petitioner Through: None versus SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF ITL PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR. .... Respondents Through: Ms. Shobha, Ms. Jyoti Rana, Advocates for respondent No.1. Ms. Bandana Shukla, Advocate for Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The limited issue in the present case is the entitlement of the petitioner to payment of salary in terms of the report of the Sixth Pay Commission for the probationary period.2. I have yesterday had an occasion to consider this aspect in the case of W.P.(C) 6789/2012 Page 1 Charanjeet Kaur Vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors. (W.P.(C) 6518/2010 decided on 29.07.2013) wherein I have held that by virtue of para 8 of the order of the Director of Education dated 11.2.2009 every Teacher and employee of a school, and wh...
Union of India Vs. Jagdish Chand Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:23. 07.2013 Judgment delivered on:30. 07.2013 + O.M.P. No. 240/2013 UNION OF INDIA ...... Petitioner Vs JAGDISH CHAND GUPTA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr J.K. Singh & Mr Anirudh, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr S.W. Haider, Advocate. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. This is a petition which seeks to assail a majority award dated 17.09.2012 (sic. 30.08.2012). The dissenting award is passed by Ms Ambika Jain, who at the relevant time was holding the post of Deputy CAO. She presently holds the post of Director/ Finance / Stores-I in the Railways. The two arbitrators who form part of the majority, Mr Balbir Singh and Mr V.K. Gupta, continue to hold the post of Deputy Chief Engineers, though in different departments. Pertinently, all three arbitrators were appointed by the petitioner.2. The challenge is laid to all three (3) claims awarded in favour o...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »