Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Institue of Chartered Accountants of India and Vs. the Director Ge ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 07.2013 W.P.(C) No.3147/2012 THE INSTITUE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Petitioners versus THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), DELHI AND ORS. ..Respondents AND + W.P.(C) No.3148/2012 THE INSTITUE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Petitioners versus THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), DELHI AND ORS. ..Respondents AND + W.P.(C) No.7181/2012 THE INSTITUE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Petitioners versus THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), DELHI AND ORS. ..Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr N. K. Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Promad Dayal, Mr Nikunj Dayal, Ms Payal Dayal and Mr Ranjit Kumar Singh For the Respondents : Mr Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms Anshul Sharma for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr Amrit Pal Singh with Ms Sweety Manchanda for respondent No.4. CORAM:HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADA...
Dr.NitIn Malik Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4038/2011 DR.NITIN MALIK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mukul Talwar and Mr. Sradhananda Mahapatra, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: % ..... Respondents Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER 04 07.2013 For detailed orders, see Crl.M.C. No. 3999/2011. SURESH KAIT, J.JULY 04 2013 sb...
Smt. Simmi Katyal Vs. Smt. Ram Pyari Batra and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. 05.2013 Pronounced on:04. 07.2013 + RFA (OS) 28/2007, C.M. APPL. 5436/2007 SMT. SIMMI KATYAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Singla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bhaskar Tiwary, Advocate. Versus SMT. RAM PYARI BATRA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vijay Kishan and Mr. Vikram Jetly, Advocates, for Resp. No.5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appeal questions the decision of the learned Single Judge dated 05.10.2006 whereby the unsuccessful plaintiffs suit claiming specific performance of a contract for sale of immovable property was dismissed. Briefly the facts are that in the suit, the plaintiff relied upon an agreement said to have been entered on 06.05.1995, whereby the defendants (respondents in this case), and RFA(OS)28/2007, C.M. APPL.5436/2007 Page 1 hereafter called sellers agreed to convey a 190 sq. yard residential plot, being A-66...
Ajay Gupta Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4039/2011 AJAY GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar and Mr. Sradhananda Mahapatra, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: % ..... Respondents Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER 04 07.2013 For detailed orders, see Crl.M.C. No. 3999/2011. SURESH KAIT, J.JULY 04 2013 sb...
Rajesh Kumar Sharma and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: July 04, 2013 + W.P.(C) 3769/2013 RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Pawan Bahl, Advocate with Ms.Kamlakshi Singh and Ms.Saundarya Singh, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for R-1. Ms.Mini Pushkarna, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners have been appointed, on contract basis, as Staff Nurse/para-medic on various dates by the erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi and with the bifurcation of the Corporation have been assigned duties under respondent No.2; North Delhi Municipal Corporation. In the year 2010 they filed an Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal which was registered as O.A.No.3327/2010 praying that they be paid same salary as also annual increments are...
M/S Pioneer Soap and Chemicals Vs. Union of India and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
$~R-20. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 12012/2009 Date of decision:4. h July, 2013 M/S PIONEER SOAP AND CHEMICALS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. C. Hari Shankar & Mr. S. Sunil, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Pioneer Soap and Chemicals, sole proprietorship of Lalit Kumar Goyal, has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, impugning two orders of the Settlement Commission dated 24th February, 2009 and 28th August, 2009 to the limited extent that he has been directed to pay interest under Rule 8 of the Customs (Import of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty for Manufacture of Excisable Goods) Rules, 1996 (1996 Rules, for short). We record that the second prayer made by the petitioner in the writ petition for grant of benefit of...
Dr. B P Joshi Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4037/2011 DR. B P JOSHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar and Mr. Sradhananda Mahapatra, Advocates. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: % ..... Respondents Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER 04 07.2013 For detailed orders, see Crl.M.C. No. 3999/2011. SURESH KAIT, J.JULY 04 2013 sb...
Anurudh Prasad Vs. P.O. Labour Court (Delhi-iii) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : Decided on : + 1st July4. h July, 2013 W.P.(C) 6786/2000 ANURUDH PRASAD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate. versus P.O. LABOUR COURT (DELHI-III) AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: % HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI 1 This is a petition filed against the award dated 17.1.2000 passed by the Labour Court No. III in I.D. No. 71/87 which held inter alia that the petitioner was not an employee of M/s Tej Press. The two issues to be determined by the Labour Court were:1. Whether there exists any relationship of employer and employee? 2. As per terms of reference. Finding to the said issues was returned as under: ISSUE NO. 1 The onus to prove this issues (sic: issue), was on the workman. The workman, however, has not produced any evidence to establish the relationship of employer and employee between him and the management of M/s Tej Press except that 2/3 letters were received by him at the address of the ...
M.R. Bhardwaj and anr. Vs. the Delhi State Cooperative Bank Ltd. and o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 07.2013 LPA 384/2013 M.R. BHARDWAJ & ANR. ..... Appellants versus THE DELHI STATE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants : Mr Sunil Malhotra For the Respondents : Mr Anand Yadav CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, ACJ (ORAL) CM No.9006/2013 (condonation of delay) We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for respondent No.1, who is the main contesting respondent. The delay of three days is condoned. The application stands disposed of. LPA 384/2013 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 19.03.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) No.4163/1992. The first appellant before us was the petitioner No.1 in that writ petition. The petitioner No. 2 in that writ petition has chosen not to file...
Ravi Kumar Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-2013
$-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :4. h JULY, 2013 + CRL.A. 609/2013 RAVI KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Arundhati Kaju, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Ravi Kumar has filed appeal to challenge correctness of the order dated 19.03.2013 of learned Additional Sessions Judge by which his prayer to order sentence in FIR Nos. 280/2010 and 05/2010, Police Station Kotwali to run concurrently was disallowed.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and have examined the record. It reveals that the appellant- Ravi Kumar was convicted in FIR No. 280/2010 for committing offence under Section 326 IPC PS Kotwali and sentenced to undergo RI for two years and six months with fine ` 2,000/-. He completed the substantive sentence on 26.01.2013. Again the appellant was convicted in FIR No. 05/2010 under Section 326 IPC PS Kotwa...
- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »