Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ls Mishra Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2625/2010 5th July, 2013 % LS MISHRA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Amit Kumar, Mr. Subrata Dass, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. S.Q. Kazim,Mr. M.H. Usmani, Advocates for respondent No. 1 with Mr. S.K. Nimmi, Dy. Education Officer. Ms. Nandini Sen, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Virender Goswami, Ms. Soni Singh, Mr. Abhinay, Advocates for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner Sh. Lajja Shankar Mishra seeks the appointment firstly to the post of Vice-Principal and then to the post of Principal of the respondent No. 2-school, namely, Lady Irwin Senior Secondary School.2. At the outset, I must concede that it has been very difficult to understand the averments in the writ petition as the writ petition does not seem to be very happily drafted, however, what would be the issues in the wr...
Manav Raj Singh Gill Vs. Army College of Medical Sciences and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:05. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4196/2013 MANAV RAJ SINGH GILL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr N.P. Gaur, Adv along with petitioner in person. versus ARMY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ajay Digpaul and Ms Arti Bansal, Avs for respondent No. 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The grievance of the petitioner is that he has been declared failed in Medicine Practical test by giving 43% marks to him though he has been performing consistently well and he got 60% marks in Surgery Practical, 60% in Pediatrics Practical and 68.3% in Obstetrician/Gynae Practical. The allegation of the petitioner is that he has been granted lesser marks in Medicine Practical at the instance of respondent No. 3 Dr. Chitralekha Khatti, Associate Professor in the Department of Medicine.2. During the course of arguments, I asked the learned counsel for the petitioner as to who had taken the Medicine Practic...
Jagriti Mahila Samiti Vs. Dda and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
2 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 354/2009 JAGRITI MAHILA SAMITI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Ramdeo, Advocate. versus DDA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. Date of Decision:05. h July, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of Resolution/Notice dated 10th September, 2007 whereby construction of Community Hall has been approved on the land initially earmarked for Nursery School and Club in colony of 512 MIG Flats, Green Apartments, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi.2. Petitioner claims to be a welfare organisation of the residents of 512 MIG Flats and states that a Community Hall is not the requirement of the residents.3. Learned counsel for petitioner further states that no hearing was given to the residents of the colony before changing use of the land in question. He also submits that the construction of ...
Shri Balbir Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
$-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :5. h JULY, 2013 + CRL.A. 50/2011 & CRL.M.B. 690/2013 SHRI BALBIR SINGH Through : versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Devraj Singh, Advocate with Ms.Shagun Anirudh, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Balbir Singh challenges correctness of judgment dated 25.11.2010 in Sessions Case No. 196/2009 arising out of FIR No. 130/2009 PS Tilak Nagar by which he was held guilty for committing offence punishable under Section 307 IPC. By an order dated 30.11.2012, he was sentenced to undergo RI for five years with fine ` 2,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 10.06.2009 at about 06.30 P.M. at House No. WZ- 331, gali No. 19, Guru Nanak Nagar, Tilak Nagar, Delhi, he attacked his wife- Manjeet Kaur with a dao (toka) and caused injuries on her head and other parts of the body. After completion of the investigation, a...
Munib Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
$-25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :5. h JULY, 2013 + CRL.A. 250/2011 MUNIB KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Shaiesh Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Munib Kumar impugns judgment dated 27.04.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 16/2008 arising out of FIR No. 656/2007 PS Hazrat Nizammudin by which he and Sunil Kumar were convicted under Section 20 (b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act. By an order dated 27.04.2010, the appellant was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine ` 70,000/- and in default of payment to undergo SI for nine months.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on the night intervening 23/24.11.2007 at Mathura Road, Nizamuddin near petrol pump, he and his associate Sunil Kumar were coming from the side of Railway Road, Nizammuddin on foot and were carrying bags on their shoulders and suit cases in ...
Anil Kumar Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :5. h July, 2013 % + CRL.REV.P.100/2012 ANIL KUMAR Through: .....Petitioner Mr.Kanwal Chaudhary, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: .....Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 13141/2012 1. This application has been moved on behalf of the petitioner seeking permission to address oral arguments.2. Prayer allowed.3. Application stands disposed of. Crl.Rev.P. No.100/2012 1. Heard.2. In this revision petition, challenge is to the order dated 18.01.2012 passed in Crl.A. No.50/2011 whereby the learned Addl. Session Judge affirmed the judgment and order on sentence dated 17.09.2011 and 03.11.2011 respectively by the learned Trial Court vide which petitioner was convicted and sentenced for committing the offence punishable under Sections 279/304-A IPC.3. In brief, the case of the prosecution is that on 10.04.2000 an information was received at PS Sa...
Shail Sahni Vs. Valsa Sara Mathew and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :02. 07.2013 Judgment pronounced on :05. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 3500/2013 SHAIL SAHNI ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person versus VALSA SARA MATHEW & ORS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Jayant Tripathi, CGSC with Ms. Nayantara Roy, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioner before this Court applied to CPIO, Delhi Cantonment Board on 15.4.2011 seeking certain information, vide his letter dated 10.5.2011. The CPIO informed the petitioner that the information sought by him was not clear and requested him to attend his office to clarify the information desired by him. Accordingly, the petitioner met with APIO in the presence of CPIO and gave certain clarifications with respect to the information sought by him. The CPIO of Western Command transferred another application of the petitioner dated 7.9.2012 to the CPIO of the Chief Executive Officer of the Cantonment Board on 13.9.2012. W.P(C) No.350...
M/S Kashyap???s Vs. Bata India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h July, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.563/2012 & I.A. No.16518/2012 (of plaintiff u/O-12 R-6) M/S KASHYAPS Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sudhir K. Chandra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pradeep K. Bakshi and Mr. Rajat Navet, Advocates. Versus BATA INDIA LTD. Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aviral Tiwari, Advocate. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW,J 1.The plaintiff has instituted this suit for mandatory injunction directing the defendant to remove itself and its products and to stop displaying and selling its products from the basement, ground and first floors admeasuring 5900 sq. ft. in property not E-16, South Extension Part-II, New Delhi and/or from using the said property in any manner whatsoever and for damages/mesne profits from the date of institution of the suit till the defendant uses the said portion of the property, together with interest thereon, pleading: (i) that the par...
Vijay Kumar Singh Vs. Mahesh Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:5. h July, 2013 % + CM(M) No. 45/2012 VIJAY KUMAR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate. Versus MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.R.C.Mahajan, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No.707/2012 (for delay) In view of the averments made in the application, the delay of six days in filing the instant appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) No. 45/2012 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 24.10.2011, whereby the learned Tribunal has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Order I Rule 2 read with Section 151 CPC for impleading the minor brothers of the deceased, namely, Rupesh Kumar Tipu, Vikas Kumar Singh and grandmother Smt. Raj Roop Devi as LRs of the deceased.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has ...
Suresh Chandra Awasthi Vs. Vijaya Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:05. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4149/2013 SURESH CHANDRA AWASTHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Vidyarthi, Adv. versus VIJAYA BANK ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court was employed with respondent-Vijaya Bank wherefrom he retired on 28.11.2008. Bank Flat No.11-D, Kanchanjangha Aptts. Sector-53, Noida was allotted to the petitioner with effect from July, 1997. A perusal of reply dated 30.10.2009 sent by the bank to the counsel for the petitioner would show that as per the extant guidelines of the bank pertaining to occupation of its quarters, an officer was eligible to occupy banks quarters for a period of maximum five years. This letter further shows that the petitioner was advised, by the Competent Authority, vide letters dated 6.6.2005, 138.2005 and 9.9.2005 to vacate the said quarter. Another letter dated 25.3.2006 was sent to him directing hi...
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »