Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narender Singh @ Faddu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : May 06, 2013 DECIDED ON : July 08, 2013 + CRL.A. 134/2011 NARENDER SINGH @ FADDU ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Biswajit and Mr. Praveen Misra, Advs. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State. AND + CRL.A. 278/2011 BRAHAM PRAKASH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Dushyant Sisodiya, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellants-Narender Singh @ Faddu (A-1), Brahm Prakash (A-2) and Mahesh (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 18.12.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.110/2008 arising out of FIR No.945/2007 registered at police station Dabri by which they were convicted under Section 304 (1)/308/323/34 IPC. By an order dated 24.12.2010, they were sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with total fine of `7,000/- each.2. The police machinery came into motion when Daily Diary (DD)...
Securi Tech India P. Ltd. Company Vs. the Chairman Central Board of Di ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 987/2012 Date of decision:8. h July, 2013 SECURI TECH INDIA P. LTD. COMPANY ..... Petitioner Through Dr. M.P. Raju, Advocate. Versus THE CHAIRMAN CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, sr. standing counsel for R-1. Mr. Abhishek Maratha, sr. standing counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Securi Tech India Pvt. Ltd., petitioner No.1 has filed the present writ petition for refund of Rs.5,42,000/- with interest. It is stated that the respondent Nos.1 to 4 i.e. the income tax authorities are not obeying and complying with the order dated 13th January, 2006 passed by the tribunal and have acted contrary to the mandate and obligation imposed by Section 240 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short).2. Rajender Prasad Tyagi, respondent No.5 was subjected to search and seizure opera...
M/S Balaji Tour Travels Vs. Union of India and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4231/2013 M/S BALAJI TOUR TRAVELS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Bhugra and Mr. E.L. Taslam Ahmad, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC with Mr. Rupinder Pal Singh, Advs. for R-1, 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court was issued a Registration Certificate granting him permission to recruit workers for overseas employment during the validity of the said certificate, i.e., up to 14.12.2013. A complaint was received from one Mr. Ashok Kumar stating therein that the petitioner had released advertisement in newspapers to work with (1) M/s Al Tawi Redimix Limited Co., Riyadh and (2) M/s Al Razi Construction Company, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia without having Demand Letters, Power of Attorneys and Specimen Employment Contracts. Also, report were received that the petitioner had lent its registration cert...
Bharat Wadhwa and anr Vs. Sushma Arora and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:8. h July, 2013. + CS(OS) 353/2012 & IA No.2716/2012 (of the plaintiffs u/O-39 R1&2). BHARAT WADHWA & ANR .... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Ratan K. Singh with Mr. Rajnesh Kumar, Advs. versus SUSHMA ARORA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. T.R. Arora, Adv. for D-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGMENT % 1. Though the hearing on 22 nd May, 2013 commenced on the application of the plaintiffs for interim relief and for the purpose of elucidating the issues arising for adjudication, but doubts having arisen as to the very maintainability of the suit, the counsels were heard on the said aspect also and orders reserved.2. The two plaintiffs have instituted this suit pleading (a) that Shri Om Prakash, paternal grandfather of the plaintiff No.2 Smt. Asha Wadhwa (plaintiff No.1 is the husband of the plaintiff No.2) was the owner of half portion i.e. 100 sq. yds. of property not D-36, Moti Nagar, New Delhi admeasuring 200...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Madan Mohan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 08, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5081/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by:Mr.Sankar N.Sinha, Advocate versus MADAN MOHAN ..... Respondent Represented by:Mr.A.K.Trivedi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in the writ petition is to the order dated January 12, 2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench in Review Application No.322/2012 in Original Application No.892/2008. The Original Application No.892/208 was filed by the respondent herein challenging his non-promotion to the post of Technician Grade-III. Since the issue of non-promotion was related to the controversy as to whether the respondent belonged to the category of Diesel Cleaner or Store Khallasi, the same was decided in favour of the respondent herein by the Tribunal in terms of order dated February 13, 2009 wherein the Tribuna...
Laxmi Narayan Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:13. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on:08. 07.2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.62/2009 LAXMI NARAYAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.S.Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. Laxmi Narayan has preferred this appeal against his conviction by impugned judgment dated 15.12.2008 under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for causing the death of Upender Chaudhary. By the order of sentence dated 16.12.2008, the appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of 4 years and a fine of Rs.5,000/- to be paid to the family of Upender Chaudhary. In case of default for payment of fine of Rs.5,000/-, the appellant is to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months.2. The incident which gave rise to the prosecution occurred on 12.07.2004 at noon time when the appellan...
Rajni Agarwal Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :5. h July, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on :8th July, 2013 % + WP(C) 1626/2012 RAJNI AGARWAL Through : ....Petitioner Dr.Sukhdev Sharma, Adv. versus UOI & ORS. Through : Respondents Ms.Shakshi Agarwal, Adv. for Mr.Himanshu Bajaj, Adv. for R-1. Mr.K.B.Upadhyay and Mr.S.N.Tripathi, Advocates for respondent nos.2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J.1. The petitioner is stated to be a resident of Himachal Pradesh. She appeared for the entrance test for seeking admission to the Himachal Pradesh Branch of National Institute of Fashion Technology (NIFT). Having succeeded in the written examination she was called for counselling and thereafter granted admission to the Accessory Designing course in the year 2009. The petitioner appeared in the Semester-I Examination Foundation Programme (Accessory Designing) (in JulyDecember 2009), promoted to Semester-II and appeared in the SemesterII Examination (January to...
Manager Telephone Nigam Ltd. and ors. Vs. Rakesh Kulshreshtha and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 08,, 2013 + W.P.(C) 1745/2012 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by:Mr.R.V.Sinha,Mr.R.S.Singh and Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates versus RAKESH KULSHRESHTHA AND ANR ..... Respondents Represented by:Mr.Saurabh Kulshreshtha for Mr.Rakesh Kulshreshtha, R-1 Ms.Saroj Bidawat with Mr.A.S.Trisem Shimray, Advocates for R-2 + W.P.(C) 1746/2012 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by:Mr.R.V.Sinha,Mr.R.S.Singh and Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates versus RAKESH KULSHRESHTHA AND ANR ..... Respondents Represented by:Mr.Saurabh Kulshreshtha for Mr.Rakesh Kulshreshtha, R-1 Ms.Saroj Bidawat with Mr.A.S.Trisem Shimray, Advocates for R-2 + W.P.(C) 1747/2012 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by:Mr.R.V.Sinha,Mr.R.S.Singh and Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates versus RAKESH KULSHRESHTHA AND ANR ..... Respondents Represented by:Mr.Saurabh Kulshreshtha for Mr.Rakesh Kulshresht...
Swarn Kanta Punj Vs. Surabhi Gehlot and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. No. 5932/2013 in CS(OS) No.3559/2012 Date of Decision:8. h July, 2013 + # ! SWARN KANTA PUNJ ..... Plaintiff Through:Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr.Adv. with Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate versus $ * SURABHI GEHLOT & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sumit Gahlawat, Mr. T.S. Thakraon, Ms. Patience Panmei & Mr. Nikhil Bhalla, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: The defendants have filed this application for rejection of plaint in this suit for permanent injunction filed by the plaintiff for restraining the defendants from creating any obstructions in her ingress and egress to the portion(Annexe) of property no. 12, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi which she claims to be occupying as a tenant and which portion includes some open space outside her residential Unit which she claims to have been using for parking her car.2. The defendants, out of whom defendant no.2 is stated to be the ...
Braham Prakash and anr. Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : May 06, 2013 DECIDED ON : July 08, 2013 + CRL.A. 278/2011 BRAHAM PRAKASH & ANR. ..... Appellants Through : Mr. Dushyant Sisodiya, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the Crl.A.No.134/2011 titled Narender Singh @ Faddu Vs.State . (S.P.GARG) JUDGE July 08, 2013 sa file of...
- ‹ Prev
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- Next ›
- Last »