Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and ors. Vs. Kiran Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: July 10, 2013. + WP(C) 8786/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Represented by: Mr.V.S.R.Krishna, Advocate with Mr.Kumar Rajesh Singh, Advocate. versus KIRAN LAL ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Kishore Kumar Patel, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Deciding WP(C) 2057/1999 Darshan Kumar Sahni vs.UOI on December 14, 2007 a Division Bench of this Court noted para 1303 of the Railway Establishment Code which defined Pay as under:Pay- Pay means the amount drawn monthly by a Government servant as: (i) The pay other than special pay or pay granted in view of his personal qualifications, which has been sanctioned for a post held by him substantively or in an officiating capacity or to which he is entitled by reason of his position in a cadre; and (ii) Overseas pay, special pay and personal pay; and (iii)Any other emoluments which he may...
Umesh Kumar Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CRL.A. 141/2003 Reserved on:8. h May, 2013 Decided on:10. h July, 2013 UMESH KUMAR Through: versus THE STATE Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjeet Singh, Advocate ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By the present appeal the Appellant lays a challenge to the judgment dated 21st February, 2003 whereby he has been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 451 and 393 IPC read with Section 34 IPC and the order on sentence dated 21st February, 2003 whereby he has been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- under Section 393 IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of one year under Section 451 IPC. The Appellant was also directed to pay Rs. 5,000/- each as compensation to PW3 and PW5 by way of pay order or bank draft in their name and in default of the same the Appellant was directed to undergo Simple Imprisonment for...
Snp Punj and anr Vs. Punj Star Industries Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS) 120/2010 SNP PUNJ & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr.J.P.Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Gurkamal, Mr.Sumeet Batra and Ms.Ankita Gupta, Advocates. versus PUNJ STAR INDUSTRIES PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Naresh K.Thanai, Advocate. Date of Decision :10. h July, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J C.M.No.2172/2011 1. CS(OS) No.4607/1992 was filed by M/s. Punjstar Industries Pvt. Ltd. (respondent herein) against three defendants, namely, Atna Engineering Pvt. Ltd., Shri SNP Punj and Shri Uday Punj. While Atna Engineering Pvt. Ltd. was sued as defendant No.1, Shri SNP Punj and Shri Uday Punj were impleaded as defendants No.2 & 3, in their capacity as Managing Director and Director respectively.2. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 06.09.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in the civil suit, the appellants, that is, Shri S.N.P.Punj and his son Shri Uday...
Sh. Jaswant Singh Vs. Atma Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h July, 2013 % + CS(OS) 1945/2006 SH. JASWANT SINGH Through: ..... Plaintiff Dr. R.S. Sasan and Mr. H.S. Sasan, Advocates. Versus ATMA SINGH Through: ..... Defendant Mr. P.S. Mahendru, Advocate. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The plaintiff has sued for specific performance of the Agreement dated 14th May, 2005 of sale of property not J-3/37, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from dealing with the said property in contravention of the said Agreement, pleading:(i). that the defendant had vide Agreement to Sell dated 14th May, 2005 agreed to sell the property to the plaintiff for a total sale consideration of Rs.30 lacs out of which Rs.6 lacs was paid as earnest money at the time of execution of the Agreement to Sell and another Rs.4 lacs was paid on the asking of the defendant on 19th May, 2005; (ii). that at the time of the agreement, a porti...
Radhey Shyam Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 10, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4875/2012 ..... Petitioner RADHEY SHYAM Represented by: Dr.M.K Gahlaut, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sankar N. Sinha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Limited show cause notice on the quantum of penalty to be levied upon the petitioner was issued on September 21, 2012.2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. We record at the outset that the petitioner was working as a Parcel Porter at Hapur Railway Station and was caught red handed accepting `100/- from a decoy passenger for loading a scooter on a train.3. We highlight that the petitioner was not the Booking Clerk. He was a Porter and the job was to load parcels and other items booked by the Railway Authorities for transportation to difference places. W P (C) 4875/2012 1 o4. The Disciplinary Authority levied ...
Puran Prasad Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CRL.A. 30/2003 Reserved on:1. t May, 2013 Decided on:10. h July, 2013 PURAN PRASAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rakesh Dahiya, Mr. Gautam Awasthi and Mr. Gagan Deep Sharma, Advocates. versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. A. S. Singh, Advocate for Mr. R.V. Sinha, Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By this appeal the Appellant lays a challenge to the judgment dated 2nd January, 2003 convicting him for offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short the PC Act) and the order on sentence dated 3rd January, 2003 whereby he has been directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of four years and a fine of Rs. 500/- each under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the PC Act and in case of default of payment of fine to undergo further Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three months on each count.2. L...
State Vs. Narender Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
$~09 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h July, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 162/2012 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. versus NARENDER BHATIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. R. D. Sharma, Adv. with Mr. Bhupendar M. Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 3586/2012 (delay) 1. The application is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent. For the reasons as stated in the application, the delay of 41 days in filing the leave to appeal is condoned.2. The application is accordingly allowed. CRL.L.P. 162/2012 3. The State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 08.02.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Rohini in Sessions Case No.725/2006 whereby the respondent (accused before the trial court) was acquitted of the charges punishable under Section 302 Indian Penal Code (IPC).4. As per the prosecution version, on 1...
Binod Singh and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2013
$~12 to 14 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4997/2011 Date of decision :10. h July, 2013 % BINOD SINGH AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tinu Bajwa & Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, Adv. for R-1 to 4. Mr. Naresh Kaushik with Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary & Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Adv. for R-5. + W.P.(C) 5457/2011 RAVI SHANKAR SINGH AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tinu Bajwa & Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG, Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advs. for R-1 to 4. Mr. Naresh Kaushik with Ms. Amita Kalkal Chaudhary & Mr. Vardhman Kaushik, Adv. for R-5. Mr. Saqib, Adv. + W.P.(C) 6403/2011 BANWARI LAL MEENA AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tinu Bajwa & Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... R...
Kailash Chand Gurjar Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: July 01, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: July 09, 2013 W.P.(C) 8512/2011 PREM SINGH & ORS. Represented by: .....Petitioners Ms.Meenu Mainee, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate with Mr.Amit Dubey, Advocate for Respondent No.1 to 3 W.P.(C) 901/2012 KAILASH CHAND GURJAR .....Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Meenu Mainee, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.V.S.R.Krishna, Advocate for Respondent No.1 to 3 Mr.A.K.Trivedi, Advocate for R-4, R-6 and R-7 W.P.(C) 2628/2013 RAM RAJIV & ORS. Represented by: .....Petitioners Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Advocates versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate with Mr.A.S.Singh and Mr.Amit Dubey, Advocates for Respondent No.1 to 3 None for the other respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADE...
Narender Singh Bhullar Vs. Inder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2007/2011 NARENDER SINGH BHULLAR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. S.S. Oberoi, Advocate. versus INDER SINGH ..... Defendant Through: Ch. Ranjit Singh, Advocate Reserved on:30. h May, 2013 Date of Decision:09. h July, 2013 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Relying on the Supreme Court's judgment in Dadarao & Anr. vs. Ramrao & Ors., IX (1999) SLT 24.and this Courts judgment in Ashok Aggarwal vs. Bhagwan Das Arora, AIR 200.DELHI 10 referred to by the defendant's counsel, this Court on 03rd April, 2013 had framed the following issues:"1. Whether present suit for specific performance of the Agreement to Sell dated 21st February, 2011 is maintainable in view of the specific term in the Agreement to Sell that in the event the Seller does not transfer the property in time, then the Purchaser shall have right to claim double the amount of bayana as compensation? OPP 2.2. Relief." It is pertinent to mention tha...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »