Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Randhir Singh and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 403/1997 Judgment delivered on:12. 07.2013 RANDHIR SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.L. Yadav, Adv. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP with Inspector Satyavirjaaula, P.S. Ashok Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR % JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. The appellants have preferred the present appeal to challenge the judgment of conviction dated 22.10.1997 and order on sentence dated 24.10.1997 thereby convicting the appellants to undergo imprisonment for life under Section 302/34 IPC and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- each and in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment of three months each and to undergo rigorous imprisonment of one month each under Sections 323/34 IPC.2. Brief facts of the case as set up by the prosecution are that the accused persons and the complainant side are resident of the Village Bak...
C.P. Gupta Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2013
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7288/2012 & CM No.6053/2013 Date of decision:12. h July, 2013 % C.P. GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Tina Bajwa, Advocate Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sachin Dutta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the disciplinary proceedings conducted against him pursuant to a memorandum of charges issued on 7th December, 2005; the findings of the inquiry officer dated 29th January, 2009; the order dated 26th August, 2010 issued by the disciplinary authority accepting the recommendations and findings of the inquiry officer and imposing the punishment of dismissal of service which shall ordinarily be a disqualification for future Government employment.2. It is contended by the petitioner that the order of penalty upon the petitioner is not sust...
Bhupinder Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2013
$-9 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3711/2013 Date of decision :12. h July, 2013 % BHUPINDER KUMAR & ORS. Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Ombir Singh and Mr. Anuj Saini, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Ravinder Aggarwal, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) CM No.6943/2013 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 3711/2013 1. With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for consideration and the matter is being heard finally.2. The facts giving rise to the petition are within a narrow compass and are mainly undisputed. To the extent necessary the same are briefly noted hereinafter.3. The petitioners joined the GREF on various dates and are holding the posts of Charge Electrician, Charge Mechanic, Superintendent (E&M), Overseers, Superintendent (B&R). The petitioners are posted in various projec...
Karan Luthra Vs. Gopal Kamra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2013
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 07.2013 + EX.P. 118/2012 KARAN LUTHRA Through: ..... Decree Holder Mr. Subhiksh Vasudev, Advocate versus GOPAL KAMRA Through: ..... Judgement Debtor Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) E.A. No.440/2012 (U/s 151 CPC preferred by the decree holder) This application has become infructuous since the execution petition and the objections preferred by the judgment debtor have been heard today. The application stands disposed of. Ex.P. No.118/2012 & E.A. No.276/2012 (Under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC) and E.A. No.675/2012(objections) By this order, I propose to dispose of the objections preferred by the judgment debtor to the present execution petition, which have been registered as E.A. No.675/2012; and the decree holders application under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC i.e. E.A. No.276/2012 for appointment of a Local Commissioner for the purpose of execution of a sale deed in term...
Shri Bal Kishan Saini Vs. M/S Devred India Ltd., (In Liqn.) and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO. APP. 42/2013 SHRI BAL KISHAN SAINI Through: ..... Appellant Mr.U.C.Bhandari, Advocate. versus M/S DEVRED INDIA LTD., (IN LIQN.) & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Ashish Makhija, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. Mr.S.K.Chaudhary, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The present Appeal is directed against the order dated 16.5.2013 passed by the learned Company Judge in CP No.200/07 for investigation of the matter by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (for short SFIO).2. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present Appeal are that in July, 2007 a winding up petition under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 in respect of the Company M/s. Devred India Pvt. Ltd. presently under liquidation was filed by the Respondent No.2 in his capacity as Director and 50% shareholder of the Company. The said winding up petitio...
Si Suresh Kumar (Retd.) Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-12-2013
$~ 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.797/2011 Date of decision:12. h July, 2013 % SI SURESH KUMAR (RETD.) ..... Petitioner Through : Ms. Rekha Palli, Mr. Punam Singh and Ms. Amrita Prakash, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS Through : ..... Respondents Mr. Ankur Chhibber and Ms. Aakriti Jain, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking award of disability pension in accordance with the CCS (Extraordinary Pension), Rules as well as the amount payable to him from the due date on account of his invalidation from service and on account of his having suffered 90% disability. It is further contended that as per the Office Memorandum dated 10 th December, 2010 issued by the Ministry of Personnel (Personal Grievance and Pension), this disability has to be reckoned as 100%. WP(C) No.797/2011 page 1 of 31 2. The factual narration giving rise to the instant wr...
Venkateshwara University Vs. Union of India and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:11. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4223/2013 VENKATESHWARA UNIVERSITY ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Mr Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocates with Mr J.S. Bhasin and Mr Abdesh Chaudhary and Mr Amit Jaiswal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr Akshay Chandra, Adv for UOI Mr Amit Kumar, Mr Ashish Kumar and Mr Ankit, Advs. for MCI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) CM No. 9843/2013 The petitioner before this Court applied to the respondent-Medical Council of India vide letter dated 29.09.2012, to start MBBS course with 100 seats. No attempt was made by the respondent-MCI to carry out inspection of the hospital and medical college of the petitioner at any time prior to 28.05.2013. In fact, the respondent-MCI, at one point of time, informed the petitioner that its application had been lost/misplaced. Vide e-mail dated 27.05.2013, respondent-MCI appointed three Professors to carry ou...
Birla Ericsson Optical Ltd. and anr. Vs. Bharat Broadband Network Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:03. 07.2013 Pronounced on:11. 07.2013 + W.P.(C) 3562/2013, C.M. NO. 6697/2013 (for interim relief), 7357/2013 (for impleadment) & 7358/2013 (for exemption) BIRLA ERICSSON OPTICAL LTD. & ANR. Versus BHARAT BROADBAND NETWORK LTD. + ..... Petitioners ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 3564/2013, C.M. NO. 6701/2013 (for interim relief), 7355/2013 (for impleadment) & 7356/2013 (for exemption) VINDHYA TELELINKS LTD. & ANR. Versus BHARAT BROADBAND NETWORK LTD. ..... Petitioners ..... Respondent Appearance: - Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Narendra M. Sharma, Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Mr. Ankur Sood, Mr. J.K. Chaudhary and Ms. Aanchal Yadav, Advocates for petitioners in W.P.(C) 3562/2013. Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Narendra M. Sharma and Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocates for petitioners in W.P.(C) 3564/2013. Mr. Manu Mridul, Advocate for respondents. Mr. Bishwajit Bhattacharyya, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Chandrachur Bhattacharya, Advocates i...
Yudhvir Singh Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 7523/2010 11th July, 2013 YUDHVIR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.D.Singh, Mr. Jitender Singh and Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Advocates. versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajat Navet, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner-Sh. Yudhvir Singh seeks quashing of the letter dated 28.8.2010 issued by the respondent no.1 denying compassionate appointment to the petitioner on the ground that Prathma Pariksha certificate of Hindi Sahitya Sammelan Allahabad obtained by the petitioner is not equivalent to matriculation from a High School.2. Parties in the present petition had an earlier round of litigation and the petitioner succeeded in that litigation being W.P.(C) 125/2010. A learned Single Judge of this Court vide judgment dated 17.3.2010 allowed the writ petition and held as not maintaina...
Nandini Dutta and Others Vs. University of Delhi and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-11-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 07.2013 WP (C) No. 822/2011 DELHI UNIVERSITY TEACHERS ASSOCIATION AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners ... Respondents Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANOTHER Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr V.K. Rao, Sr Advocate with Mr Saket Sikri And Mr Sudeep Dey, Advs. For the Respondents : Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Sr Advocate with Mr M.J.S. Rupal, Ms Monisha Handa and Mr Arunabh Ganguli, Advs. for DU. AND + WP (C) No. 2764/2011 NANDINI DUTTA AND OTHERS ... Petitioners ... Respondents versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND OTHERS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Colin Gonsalves, Sr Advocate with Mr Tariq Adeeb, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Sr Advocate with Mr M.J.S. Rupal, Ms Monisha Handa and Mr Arunabh Ganguli, Advs. for DU. Mr Mayank Manish, Adv. with Mr Amitesh Kumar for UGC. Mr Sachin Dutta, CGSC for UOI. For the Intervenors : Mr Prashant Bhushan, Adv. with Ms Pyoli, Ad...
- ‹ Prev
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- Next ›
- Last »