Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramjas Foundation Vs. Dheer Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
A$~40. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 21.05.2013 15.07.2013 W.P.(C.) No. 883/2010 (Arising out of award dated 24.10.2009 in ID No.06/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus DHEER SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6499/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1292/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SATYA PRAKASH SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6501/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.10/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SUNITA SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6514/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1293/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus NARAYAN JHA Through: ..... ...
Kamlesh Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.7886/2011 15th July, 2013 % KAMLESH KUMAR SINGH & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. C. Hari Shankar, Advocate with Mr. S. Panda, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, CGSC for respondent No.1. Mr. G. Tushar Rao, Advocate with Mr. D.V. Venkata Krishnajee, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Sahil Bhalaik, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 and 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioners seek the relief of being granted all monetary benefits including the arrears pleading that they should be treated as regular employees from the dates of their initial appointments viz 4.5.1994 (petitioner No.1) and 9.5.1994 (petitioner No.2).2. At the outset, I must note a detailed order which is passed by the Chairman of the respondent No.2/National Commission for Backward Classes ie the employer...
Ramjas Foundation Vs. M.K.Bhargav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
A$~40. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 21.05.2013 15.07.2013 W.P.(C.) No. 883/2010 (Arising out of award dated 24.10.2009 in ID No.06/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus DHEER SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6499/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1292/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SATYA PRAKASH SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6501/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.10/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SUNITA SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6514/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1293/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus NARAYAN JHA Through: ..... ...
Trilok Singh (Deceased) Through: Lr Jagmohan Singh Vs. Inder Pal (Dece ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:15.07.2013 + FAO (OS) 313/2013 CM APPL.10415/2013 TRILOK SINGH (DECEASED) THROUGH: LR JAGMOHAN SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sujeet Kr. Mishra, Advocate. versus INDER PAL (DECEASED) & ORS Through: None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The present appeal is directed against an order of the learned Single Judge dated 12.03.2013, dismissing I.A. No.14076/2007. By that application, the plaintiff - who died during the pendency of appeal - has sought for recall of the order dated 23.03.2007 by which the suit had been withdrawn.2. The brief facts necessary for disposing off the present appeal are that the plaintiff approached the Court seeking a declaration that registered gift deed dated 5.5.2004 in favour of his grand sons arrayed as second and third respondents was invalid and not enforceable. He also sought consequentia...
O.P.Sobti Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No.5226/1993 15th July, 2013 O.P.SOBTI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Ms. Sapna Chauhan and Ms. Kalpana, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Paritosh Budhiraja, Adv. and Mr. Vikas B. Pakhiddey, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The relief claimed in this writ petition is the challenge to the memorandum/show-cause notice dated 21.9.1988, any enquiry proceedings based thereupon and any orders passed by the Departmental Authority thereon.2. Respondent no.2/employer has filed counter-affidavit and it is stated that proceedings pursuant to the memorandum/show-cause notice dated 21.9.1988 have been dropped. Respondent no.2/employer however relies upon a subsequent order of the Disciplinary Authority dated 18.12.1990 which has held that the petitioner deserted from services of the corporation/NPCC...
Smt Rama Devi (D) Thr Lrs Vs. Shri Sri Bhagwan (Deceased) Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: July 15, 2013 + CM(M) No.693/2013 & C.M.No.10454/2013 SMT RAMA DEVI (D) THR LRS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Rajinder Mathur, Adv. versus SHRI SRI BHAGWAN (DECEASED) THR LRS Through None ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is arising out of the order dated 26 th March, 2013 passed by the Civil Judge-15, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi who rejected the application filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs under Order VI, Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC for amendment of the plaint. It was stated in the application that inadvertently, property No.592, Chirag Delhi, New Delhi was not incorporated in the plaint, though property No.603 and 603A, Chirag Delhi were included.2. In fact, the petitioners filed the suit for partition and injunction against the respondent No.1 on 1st December, 1994. The suit was contested by respondent No.1 who filed the written statement....
Jai Veer Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. A. 249/2003 Date of Decision:15. h July, 2013 JAI VEER SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Jitender Tyagi, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Fizani Husain, APP CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 26.03.2003 and the order on sentence dated 31.03.2003 arising out of Sessions Case No.133/96 in case FIR 310/94 u/s 392/397/34 IPC, P.S. Okhla Industrial Area, vide which the appellant along with his co-accused was held guilty of offence u/s 392 read with Section 34 IPC and was sentenced to undergo 27 months rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each, in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days.2. Prosecution case emanates from the fact that on 8.10.1994, ASI Shiv Singh (PW7) along with Ct. Anand Kumar (PW3) and Ct. Brahm Singh reached Shyam Nagar at about 11.50 a.m where the complainant Ravinder Chetwa...
Ramjas Foundation Vs. Praveen Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
A$~40. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 21.05.2013 15.07.2013 W.P.(C.) No. 883/2010 (Arising out of award dated 24.10.2009 in ID No.06/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus DHEER SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6499/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1292/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SATYA PRAKASH SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6501/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.10/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SUNITA SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6514/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1293/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus NARAYAN JHA Through: ..... ...
Ramjas Foundation Vs. Kusum Nigam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
A$~40. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 21.05.2013 15.07.2013 W.P.(C.) No. 883/2010 (Arising out of award dated 24.10.2009 in ID No.06/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus DHEER SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6499/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1292/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SATYA PRAKASH SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6501/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.10/2005) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus SUNITA SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate. W.P.(C) 6514/2010 (Arising out of award dated 21.05.2010 in ID No.1293/2004) RAMJAS FOUNDATION Through: .... Petitioner Mr. Sudhendhu P Gautam, Advocate. versus NARAYAN JHA Through: ..... ...
D R Singh and anr Vs. Smt Deepa Chaudhary and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:15. 07.2013 + FAO (OS) 315/2013 CM APPL.10502-10504/2013 D R SINGH & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate. versus SMT DEEPA CHAUDHARY & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg with Mr. Shashank Mittal, Advocate for Resp-1. Mr. Sunil Mittal, Advocate for Resp-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) CM APPL.10503/2013 (condonation of delay) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL.10504/2013 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. FAO (OS) 315/2013 & CM APPL.10502/2013 (stay) 1. The appeal is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 21.02.2013 declining the plaintiffs application requesting for FAO (OS) 315/2013 Page 1 drawing a decree on the basis of admission under Order-XII Rule-6, CPC.2. The brief facts are that the plaintiff in the suit claimed a decree for possession agains...
- ‹ Prev
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- Next ›
- Last »