Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Taj Trade and Transport Co. Ltd. Vs. Next Wave Corporation and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h July, 2013. + RFA 85/2012 M/S TAJ TRADE AND TRANSPORT CO. LTD. ...Appellant Through: Mr. Nakul Sachdeva and Ms. Saloni Choudhary, Advocates. Versus NEXT WAVE CORPORATION & ANR ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW\ JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. None has appeared for the two respondents inspite of service of notice.2. The impugned judgment and decree records that the two respondents though filed a written statement to the suit before the Trial Court but had thereafter stopped appearing and were proceeded against ex-parte in the suit.3. The respondents are proceeded against ex-parte in this appeal also.4. Admit.5. The Trial Court record has already been received. The same has been perused and the counsel for the appellant has been heard.6. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 30 th July, 2011 of Additional District Judge, West Delhi dismissing CS(OS) No.265/2010/92 fil...
Ranjit Singh Bisht and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 16, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5451/2012 RANJIT SINGH BISHT AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.B.V.Niren, Advocate with Mr.Prason Jain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in writ petition is to the order dated November 03, 2011 in Original Application No.4384/2010. The Original Application was filed by the petitioners herein challenging the Recruitment Rules known as SSB (Secretarial) Service, 2006 and enforced vide notification dated November 20, 2006 for Group-B (Gazetted and Non Gazetted) Ministerial posts.2. It is the case of the petitioners that a specialized outfit known as Special Services Bureau was formed to defend the territorial integrity of borders of the country with active involvement of border population. This unit was under...
Santosh Dhankar Vs. Pratima Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: July 16, 2013 + RC. Rev. No.151/2012 SANTOSH DHANKAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.S.C. Singhal, Adv. versus PRATIMA DEVI ..... Respondent Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. No one is present on behalf of the respondent despite second call. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.2. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 25B(8) of the Rent Control Act against the order dated 5 th March, 2012 whereby the respondents application under Section 25 B of the Delhi Rent Control Act for leave to contest the eviction petition was allowed.3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner filed an eviction petition against the respondent pleading therein that the petitioner is owner of the property No.10/27-B, Yogmaya Mandir, Ward No.1, Mehrauli, New Delhi, and the respondent is a tenant in respect of one room shown in red colour in the site plan and ...
Sh. Gulbir Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$-8 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9077/2011 Date of decision :16. h July, 2013 % SH. GULBIR SINGH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.S.R.Kalkal, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through : ..... Respondent Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for consideration and the matter is being heard finally.2. The facts giving rise to the petition are within a narrow compass and are mainly undisputed. To the extent necessary the same are briefly noted hereinafter.3. The petitioners joined the GREF on various dates and are holding the posts of Charge Electrician, Charge Mechanic, Superintendent (E&M), Overseers, Superintendent (B&R). The petitioners are posted in various projects and they have claimed in the writ petition that they are entitled to all the rights and privileges as have been made available to other personnel...
Ramesh Advani Vs. Hiro Advani and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h July, 2013 % + CS(OS) 1828/2012, IAs No.5183/2013 (of defendant no.1 u/S 15.CPC), 11449/2012 (u/O 3.R-1&2), 22979/2012 (for directions) & 22980/2012 (u/S 15.CPC) RAMESH ADVANI Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Parmod K. Sharma, Adv. versus HIRO ADVANI & ANR Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Manu Nayar, Ms. Nisha Rawat, Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh & Ms. Priyanka, Advs. for D-1. Mr. Ritesh Agarwal, Adv. for D-2. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The plaintiff has sued for declaration that he is a co-owner of property bearing not BA-238, Tagore Garden, New Delhi and for partition thereof and permanent injunction restraining the defendant no.1 from dealing with the said property, pleading:(i). that the plaintiff Shri Ramesh Advani and the defendants Shri Hiro Advani and Mrs. Manju Keswani are the only children of Shri Leelaram Jagatrai Advani who after his retirement from the post of Supdt. CPWD purchased p...
Master Mohan Kumar Vs. Mohd. Javed and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. h July, 2013 MAC.APP. 782/2006 MASTER MOHAN KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. versus MOHD. JAVED & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa, Adv. for R2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant appeal, appellant has assailed the judgment dated 25.07.2006 whereby, Ld. Tribunal has granted Rs.1,20,000/- as compensation towards the disability sustained due to the accident.2. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that PW1 Rajkumar, father of the appellant deposed before the Ld. Tribunal that in the alleged accident, his son had become sandwich between the shutter and the van. Due to which skin on his right hand peeled off and the thumb of the right hand was amputated and fingers were damaged. He also suffered injuries on the left hand apart from other injuries.3. Further stated that he remained admitted in GTB Hospital for 13-14 days and an o...
Akhilesh Kumar Dixit and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2977/2010 Date of decision:16. h July, 2013 % AKHILESH KUMAR DIXIT & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Anshuman Sinha, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Joginder Sukhyo, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for issuance of directions to the respondents for considering the petitioners for promotions to the post of Superintending Engineer (Civil) in the Border Roads Engineering Service (BRES) which is also controlled by the Department of Personnel and the Ministry of Defence. The petitioners have complained that statutory guidelines were issued by the Central Government through a letter dated 6th May, 1972 by the Department of Personnel and Training to carry out a mandatory Cadre Review after an interval of every three years. However, even after expiry of more than...
Puran Chand Vs. Brij Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.S.A. No.16 of 2001 Decided on :16. h July, 2013 PURAN CHAND Through: Appellant Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajit Dayal, Advocate. Versus BRIJ LAL Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) Review Application No.206/2013 1. This is an application filed by the appellant seeking review of order dated 25.2.2013.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant/applicant and have gone through the averments made in the application.3. Since no error apparent on the face of the record has been pointed out in the order, therefore, the application is dismissed. V.K. SHALI, J.JULY16 2013/AA...
Ms. Neeru Vs. University of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on 12th July, 2013 Judgment pronounced on 16th July, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 6500/2012 & CM APPL. 17231/2012 MS. NEERU Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.A.P.Mohanty, Advocate versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.M.J.S. Rupal and Ms.Priti Dhiwan, Advocate for respondents no.1 and 2 Mr.Vivek Bhardwaj, Adv. for R=3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.1. The petitioner is a student of B.A. (Hons.) in Social Work course in Bhim Rao Ambedkar College, University of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the said course). The petitioner was admitted in the said course in year 2010. The course is of three years duration.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents in declaring her as failed in the paper / subject Concurrent field work and consequently declared her unsuccessful (failed) in the second year of B.A. (Honrs.) Programme Social Work, despite the petitioner successfully completing...
Union of India and anr. Vs. Biswabijoyee Panigarihi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 11, 2013 Judgment pronounced on: July 15, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 4539/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate with Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates versus BISWABIJOYEE PANIGARIHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: None for R-1 Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for R2 W.P.(C) 6156/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate with Mr.A.S.Singh, Advocates versus T.R.MALIK AND ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.K.Singh and Mr.K.S.Prasad, Advocates for R-1 Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for UPSC. W.P.(C) 6157/2012 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: WP(C) 4539/2012, 6156/2012, 6157/2012 ..... Petitioner Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate with versus R.P.S. PANWAR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.R.P.Kapur, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for R2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »