Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Sikka Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. National Agricultural Cooperative Ma ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h July, 2013 % + CS(OS) 2363/2010 M/S SIKKA PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal with Mr. Sudeep Kumar Shrotriya, Mr. Anwar Rafiq, Mr. Jatin Mongia, Advocates Versus NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD...... Defendant Through: Mr. A.K. Thakur, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J I.A. No.2293/2011 (of the plaintiff under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC) & IA No.13401/2012 of the defendant for release of the amount) 1. The plaintiff in this suit, inter alia for recovery of Rs.5,37,50,000/- with interest, seeks judgment on admissions. The defendant while contesting the said application also seeks release unto itself of the said amount lying deposited in this Court together with interest accrued thereon.2. It is not in dispute: (i) that the defendant on 06.06.2008 got published in the newspapers a notice of public auction to be held on 25.06.2008 of ...
Vinod Kumar Vs. Uoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$~R-1A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: July 16, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4408/2002 VINOD KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Shekhar Kumar, Advocate versus UOI ..... Respondent Represented by: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. On May 13, 1991 a charge memo was issued listing 4 articles of charge against the petitioner. The statement of imputation in support of the charges highlighted the factual basis for the 4 articles of charge. List of relief upon documents were indicated in Annexure 3 to the charge memo. Witnesses through whom charges were intended to be proved were likewise listed in Annexure 4 to the charge memo.3. The allegations constituting 4 articles of charge as highlighted in the summary of allegations were:(i) During his working as a civilian Motor Driver in the NCC Directorate between September 19, 1990 to February 19, 1991 ...
Ajay Kumar Yadav and ors Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences N ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :11. 07.2013 Judgment pronounced on :16. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 3465/2011 DR. SANJAY KUMAR YADAV & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Nitin Gupta and Mr. M.D. Sharma, Advs. Versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, NEW DELHI & ANR. .... Respondents Through Mr. Sumit Babbar, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Adv. for R-2. And + W.P.(C) No.6300/2011 AJAY KUMAR YADAV AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Nitin Gupta and Mr. M.D. Sharma, Advs. versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES NEW DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sumit Babbar, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioners are doctors, who are pursuing their post graduation with respondent No. 1-All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). All of them were admitted against the seats meant for sponsored/foreign candidates....
Escorts Ltd and ors Vs. Neelam Malhotra and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: July 12, 2013 Judgment pronounced on: July 16, 2013 + CM(M) No.659/2012 & C.M.No.10027/2012 ESCORTS LTD & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.Naresh Khanna, Adv. versus NEELAM MALHOTRA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sanjeev Bajaj, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Satpal Singh, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The abovementioned petition has been filed by the petitioners against the impugned order dated 5th March, 2012 passed by the learned trial Court whereby the application filed by the petitioners/defendants under Section 151 CPC for rejecting the evidence by way of affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No.1/plaintiff has been partly dismissed.2. As far as the facts of the case are concerned, respondent No.1/plaintiff was an employee of petitioner No.1 for over 28 years and in view of the financial crisis faced by the petitioners, she was asked to tender her voluntary resignation. However...
Sheela Kaur Vs. Cbi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:24. h May, 2013 Judgment delivered on:16th July, 2013 CRL.REV.P. 113/2011 & CRL. M.A. 3018-19/2011 SHEELA KAUR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Virender Verma, Mr. Gursimran Singh and Mrs. Kamna Vohra, Advocates Versus CBI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.D.P.Singh, Special PP with Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.For detailed orders, see Crl. Rev. P. 438/2010. SURESH KAIT, J JULY 16 2013 RS...
Anil Kumar @ Chhotu Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$~13. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 882/2013 % Judgment dated 16.07.2013 ANIL KUMAR @ CHHOTU ..... Appellant Through : Mr.R.K. Anand, Adv. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Richa Kapoor, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) CM 10359/2013.1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. CM 10358/2013.3. This is an application filed by the appellant seeking condonation of 553 days delay in filing the present appeal.4. Notice. Learned counsel for the State accepts notice and has no objection if the present application is allowed.5. Heard. For the reasons stated in the application and in view of the stand taken by counsel for the State, present application is allowed. Delay in filing the present appeal is condoned.6. Application stands disposed of. CRL.A. 882/2013 7. Admit. With the consent of counsel for the parties present appeal is set down for fi...
Sajjan Kumar Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:24. h May, 2013 Judgment delivered on:16th July, 2013 CRL.REV.P. 438/2010 & CRL. M.A. 13980/2010 SAJJAN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amerinder Saran, Sr. Advocate with Mr.A.K.Sharma, Mr. Apoorv Sharma, Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocates and Mr. R.M.Tatia, Advocates. Versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.D.P.Singh, Special PP with Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Advocate. Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Virender Verma, Mr. Gursimran Singh and Mrs. Kamna Vohra, Advocates for Intervenor. AND + CRL.REV.P. 439/2010 & CRL. M.A. 13984/2010 VED PRAKASH PIAL @ VEDU PARDHAN & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.A.K.Sharma, Mr. Apoorv Sharma, Mr. Anuj Sharma, Mr. Vineet Malhotra and Mr. R.M. Tatia, Advocates. Versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.D.P.Singh, Special PP with Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Advocate. Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Virender Verma, Mr. Gursimran Singh and Mrs. Kamna Vohra, Advocates for Intervenor. Crl...
Shubham Virendra Jhamb Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:16. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4415/2013 SHUBHAM VIRENDRA JHAMB ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Peeyoosh Kalra, Adv. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION .... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioner before this Court qualified his Higher Secondary Examination from Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Education in the year 2013 and in the Mark sheet issued to him by the said Board, his marks were shown as 515 out of 600, i.e., 85.83%. The petitioner applied for correction of the said marks and vide communication dated 05.07.2013, the marks were revised to 520, i.e., 86.67%. The petitioner had also appeared in the JEE Examination conducted by the respondent-Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) for admission to various technical institutes and colleges. The said examination was conducted in two phases, the JEE Main having been conducted by CBSE, follow...
AshuddIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :10. h JULY, 2013 DECIDED ON :16. h JULY, 2013 + CRL.A. 1581/2011 ASHUDDIN Through : ....Appellant Ms.Jyoti Gupta, Advocate. versus .Respondent STATE Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. SI Bhanu Kanwaria, PS Mayur Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Ashuddin and Sher Khan @ Shahid Ali Mulla @ Arif were sent for trial in case FIR No. 64/2011 PS Mayur Vihar with allegations that on 02.03.2011 at about 06.45 P.M. at road near 25 Block, Trilok Puri, Bus Stand, they and their associates boarded a DTC bus bearing No. DL 1PB-3177 on route No. 360 and robbed bag containing tickets and cash `280/- from Nitu-Conductor in the bus at the point of knife. The assailants got down the bus to flee and were chased. Ashuddin was caught hold at some distance and the bag robbed was recovered from his possession. The Investigating Officer lodged First Information Report after recording complainants/Nitus statement. During investigation, h...
U.O.i and ors. Vs. U.C.Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 16, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8392/2008 U.O.I & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj and Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, Advocates versus U.C.SHARMA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.R.K.Vats, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The present Writ Petition is one amongst many litigations filed by the parties, herein, against each other. Instant petition has been filed by the Union of India and its functionaries challenging the order dated August 20, 2008 whereby the Tribunal has allowed the Original Application No.285/2008 filed by the respondent herein with a direction to release the increments of the respondent from 1978 till 1984 with arrears thereof within a period of 2 months from the receipt of copy of the order.2. The brief facts are that, while serving under G.E(West) Lucknow the respondent was posted to G.E (Danapur) in terms of orde...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »