Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi -iv Vs. Delhi Tourism and Transportat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$~8. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 92/2013 Date of decision:16. h July, 2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI -IV ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus DELHI TOURISM & TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORTATION LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the following substantial question of law is framed: Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 80M of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties on the aforesaid question and proceed to dictate our judgment.3. Respondent is a domestic company wholly owned by the Government of NCT of Delhi and the Assessment Year involved is 1993-94. The assessee had disclosed inc...
Mangal Singh Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 885/2010 MANGAL SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. % Date of Decision: July 16, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Mangal Singh impugned the judgment dated 23.09.2009 and order of sentence dated 30.09.2009 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.423/2006 arising out of FIR No.569/2004, PS Tilak Nagar, vide which he was convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 302/307 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life with a direction that he shall not be considered for being granted remission till he undergoes an actual sentence of 30 years and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- for the offence under Section 302 IPC, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for a...
Shripal Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$~14 & 15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. h July, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 4383/2013 SHRIPAL Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.C.M.Chopra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.D.S.Vohra, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Saqib, Advocate for R-1 and R-2 Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Advocate for R-3 W.P.(C) 4384/2013 SHRIPAL Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.C.M.Chopra, Sr.Advocate with Mr.D.S.Vohra, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Amrit Pal Singh, Advocate for R1 and R-2 Mr.Rajiv Nanda, Advocate for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Petitioner Shripal is a lawyers delight and a Judges despair. He has kept the lawyers happy for over two decades and instant writ petition appears to be the eighth or the ninth round of litigation.2. He was employed in the Public Works Department of the Central Government as a skilled beldar on October 16, ...
Smt. Hardeep Kaur and ors. Vs. Shri Sadhu Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 07.2013 + CS(OS) 303/2008 SMT. HARDEEP KAUR & ORS. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Advocate versus SHRI SADHU SINGH & ORS. Through None. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The plaintiffs, who are four in number, have filed the present suit to claim reliefs of partition, rendition of accounts and permanent injunction against the three defendants. The reliefs of partition have been sought in respect of the following two properties; (i) the property bearing No. 2113/164, Tri Nagar, Delhi, which admittedly was owned by Smt. Sant Kaur, wife of late Shri Balwant Singh; and (ii) factory premises No. 256/9, Gali No. 7, Padam Nagar, Kishan Ganj, Delhi, owned by Shri Balwant Singh. The plaintiffs have claimed 1/4th share in the aforesaid properties. The plaintiffs have also sought rendition of accounts in respect of the firm M/s Balwant Plastic Industries which wa...
Sudesh Rani Vs. Subhash Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h July, 2013 % + RFA No.142/2002 SUDESH RANI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan with Mr. Varun Garg, Adv. versus SUBHASH SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv., Mr. & Mr. Nikhil Jain, Adv. for R-1&2. Mr. Rakesh Dahiya, Adv. for R5,6,7&8. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 7 th November, 2001 of the learned Addl. District Judge, Delhi dismissing suit No.305/1992 (old suit No.64/1985) filed by the appellant for specific performance of an Agreement dated 24th April, 1969 of sale of property No.12/43, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi.2. Notice of this appeal was issued and the appeal was admitted for hearing on 17th July, 2003. Though the parties were referred to mediation but the same remained unsuccessful.3. Shri Tola Singh and Shri Bhagat Singh were the owners of the property and who were averred to have vide ag...
Ved Prakash Pial @ Vedu Pardhan and anr. Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:24. h May, 2013 Judgment delivered on:16th July, 2013 CRL.REV.P. 439/2010 & CRL. M.A. 13984/2010 VED PRAKASH PIAL @ VEDU PARDHAN & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.A.K.Sharma, Mr. Apoorv Sharma, Mr. Anuj Sharma, Mr. Vineet Malhotra and Mr. R.M. Tatia, Advocates. Versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.D.P.Singh, Special PP with Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Advocate. Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Virender Verma, Mr. Gursimran Singh and Mrs. Kamna Vohra, Advocates for Intervenor. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.For detailed orders, see Crl. Rev. P. 438/2010. SURESH KAIT, J JULY 16 2013 RS...
Dharam @ Banti Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : July 11, 2013 DECIDED ON : July 16, 2013 + CRL.A. 309/2012 DHARAM @ BANTI Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Gautam Khazanchi, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Dharam @ Banti (the appellant) challenges a judgment dated 30.05.2009 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 78/1/2008 arising out of FIR No. 194/2008 PS Bindapur by which he was held guilty for committing offence under Section 392/34 read with Section 397 IPC. By an order dated 03.07.2009 he was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years under Section 397 IPC.2. Allegations in the charge-sheet were that on 06.08.2008 at about 01.00 A.M. at 40 Foota Road, near Jagdamba Sweets Palace, Chanakya Palace, Dharma @ Banti and his associates Manish Khanna @ Punjabi and Sanju @ Sandeep @ Tapul committed robbery and deprived Sandeep Kumar of his motorcycle not DL...
Bips Systems Ltd. Vs. Tata Infotech Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h July, 2013 % + RFA 69/2003 BIPS SYSTEMS LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Amit, Advocate. Versus TATA INFOTECH LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Munindra Dulvedi, Ms. Preeti Yadav and Ms. Divya Bhall, Advocates. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J CM No.12828/2012 (of appellant u/S 14.of CPC) 1. This appeal was preferred against a money decree in favour of the respondent and against the appellant. Vide interim order dated 25 th November, 2003 as modified on 16 th December, 2003, the operation of the judgment and decree was stayed subject to the appellant depositing the decretal amount of Rs.2,35,110/- with the Registrar General of this Court and the respondent was granted liberty to withdraw that amount on furnishing security to the satisfaction of the Registrar General of this Court. The amount was so deposited by the appellant and withdrawn by the respondent by furnishing a Bank Guarantee....
Shahnawaz @ Shanu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.892/2010 SHAHNAWAZ @ SHANU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP AND + CRL.A. 1399/2010 SAMEER SALMANI @ SONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP Date of Decision:16. h July, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the impugned judgment dated 31.05.2010 and order on sentence dated 04.06.2010 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Session Case No. 119/2007 arising out of FIR No. 283/2007, Police Station Vivek Vihar whereby both the accused persons were convicted for offence under Section 302/34 and 323/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 3000/- each, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for one month for offence punishabl...
Dr. Sanjay Kumar Yadav and ors. Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sci ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :11. 07.2013 Judgment pronounced on :16. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 3465/2011 DR. SANJAY KUMAR YADAV & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Nitin Gupta and Mr. M.D. Sharma, Advs. Versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, NEW DELHI & ANR. .... Respondents Through Mr. Sumit Babbar, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Adv. for R-2. And + W.P.(C) No.6300/2011 AJAY KUMAR YADAV AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Nitin Gupta and Mr. M.D. Sharma, Advs. versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES NEW DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sumit Babbar, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC with Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioners are doctors, who are pursuing their post graduation with respondent No. 1-All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). All of them were admitted against the seats meant for sponsored/foreign candidates....
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »