Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Darshan Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.4465 /2013 17th July, 2013 % SH. DARSHAN SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. G.D. Parashar, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner at the time of retirement was an employee of the Government of NCT of Delhi. Subsequent to his retirement he was issued a chargesheet and his terminal benefits were stopped. As per Sections 14 and 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, any disputes of the employees of the Govt. of NCT of Delhi with the Govt. of NCT of Delhi have to be decided by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT).2. Petitioner approached the CAT, argued his case and thereafter withdrew the same unconditionally. The following order was passed by the CAT in O.A. No.1787/2013 on 28.5.2013:Sh. K.K. Aggarwal, holding brief of Sh. G.D. Parashar, coun...
New Delhi Municipal Council and anr. Vs. Chander Lata
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 17, 2013 + W.P.(C) 3234/2011 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR Represented by: ..... Petitioners Ms.Jyoti Singh, Senior Adv. with Ms.Tinu Bajwa and Ms.Sahilla Lamba, Advocates versus CHANDER LATA Represented by: ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Respondent Chander Lata, working as a Junior Librarian was seeking benefit of the Assures Career Progression Scheme as per which a person holding a post if not being promoted once in 12 years and for a second time within 24 years would be entitled to a financial upgradation after 12 years and 24 years.2. As per the ACP scheme if the post was an isolation post the financial upgradation had to be in the next above pay scale and if there was a promotional post available, the financial upgradation had to be by placing the person in the pay scale of the promotional post.3. Respondent...
Kundan Ghosh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4364/2013 Date of decision:17. h July, 2013 % KUNDAN GHOSH Through : ..... Petitioner Md. Azam Ansari, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through : ..... Respondents Ms. Barkha Babbar, Adv. Mr.Subhasish Bhowmick, Adv. for Ms.Aliva Ghosh (wife of petitioner) CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner prays for stay of the movement order dated 12th March, 2013 whereby he stands posted to Barrackpore with effect from 24th June, 2013. The primary ground urged by the petitioner in support of his writ petition is that he has to attend the case which has been filed by his wife Smt. Aliva Ghosh in the Supreme Court of India which he states is listed on 22nd July, 2013.2. In the hearing before us today, Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, Advocate has appeared and informed that he represents the wife of WP(C) No.4364/2013 page 1 of 3 the petitioner - Smt....
M/S Atul Industries Vs. M/S Grid India Power Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :03. 07.2013 Judgment Pronounced on :17. 07.2013 + CS(OS) 2578/2010 M/S ATUL INDUSTRIES Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Ashok Mittal, Adv. Versus M/S GRID INDIA POWER LTD. & ORS. Through None. ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA. No. 20174/2011 (u/O 9 R 7 CPC) This is an application under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC filed by the defendants for setting aside ex parte proceedings against the defendants. The defendants were proceeded ex parte vide order dated 17.08.2011. On 21.09.2011, counsel for the defendant appeared and made a statement that he intends to move an application for setting aside ex parte order dated 17.08.2011. Thereafter, the defendants filed an IA No. 20174/2011 under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC which came up for hearing on 16.12.2011 and notice of the application was issued to the plaintiff. The order directed that the application will be taken on the next date of hearing for disposal. O...
Asian Paints (India) Ltd. Vs. Satish Kumar and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:17. 07.2013 + CS(OS) 1319/2005 ASIAN PAINTS (INDIA) LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sushant Singh, Advocate with Mr. P.C.Arya, Tejinder Singh and Ms. Parveen Arya, Advocates versus SATISH KUMAR & OTHERS Through: Nemo. ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. None has appeared for the defendant Nos. 1 to 2 despite passover. Accordingly, they are proceeded ex-parte. Defendant No. 3 was proceeded ex-parte on 07.02.2012. Defendant No. 4 already stands deleted from the array of defendants on 07.02.2012. 2 I have heard learned counsel for the plaintiff who has taken me to the record and made his submissions. I now proceed to dispose of the suit. 3 The case of the plaintiff is that it is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. Shri Sunil S. Jaifalkar is the constituted attorney of the plaintiff who has instituted the suit. The Power of Attorney dated 27.01.2003 exec...
P.S.Pruthi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on July 04, 2013 Judgment Delivered on July 17, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2859/2013 P.S.PRUTHI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.C.Harishankar Mr.S.Panda, Advocate with versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Jatan Singh, Mr.Sumeet Qureshi with Mr.Gaurav Sharma, Advocates W.P.(C) 4140/2013 UNION OF INDIA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr.Jatan Singh, Mr.Sumeet Qureshi with Mr.Gaurav Sharma, Advocates versus P.S.PRUTHI & ORS. Represented by: W.P.(C) Nos.2859/2013 & 4140/2013 ..... Respondents Mr.C.Harishankar with CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The aforesaid two petitions have been filed against an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi dated February 07,2013 in Original Application No.4405/2012 and as such are being disposed of by this common ...
Design Works Vs. Icici Bank Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h July, 2013 % + RFA 383/2012 DESIGN WORKS Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Adv. Versus ICICI BANK LTD .... Respondent Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla, Ms. Chetna Bhalla and Mr. Pranav Proothi, Advocates. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 23 rd March, 2012 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ), North West- IV, Rohini, Delhi decreeing the suit of the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.5,29,534.72 along with proportionate costs and interest @ 9% per annum from the date of institution till realization against the appellant/defendant.2. This appeal was accompanied with an application for condonation of delay in re-filing. Though the appeal came up first before this Court on 7 th September, 2012 but notice of the application for condonation of delay was issued to the respondent/plaintiff only on 1st February, 2013 as prior ...
State Vs. Arvind Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 21/2013 Judgment delivered on 17th July, 2013 % STATE Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Richa Kapoor, Adv. versus ARVIND SINGH AND ORS. Through ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. State has filed the present leave to appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment dated 28.8.2012 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, arising out of an FIR lodged under Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC. The acquittal of the husband and mother-in-law of the deceased by the trial court has led to the filing of the present leave to appeal.2. The case of the prosecution, as noticed by the trial court, is that a woman, namely, Padma, died of hanging in her matrimonial home on 4.2.2010. The deceased was brought dead to DDU Hospital by her husband, Arvind, respondent no.1, in an unusual state. On receipt of DD No.28A, Inspr.Sandeep alongwith SI Hari Singh,...
Brahmanand Gupta and anr Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:24. h May, 2013 Judgment delivered on:16th July, 2013 W.P.(CRL) 205/2010 & Crl. M.A. No. 1779/2010 BRAHMANAND GUPTA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.A.K.Sharma, Mr. Apoorv Sharma and Mr. Anuj Sharma, Advocates. Mr. Vineet Malhotra and Mr. R.M. Tatia, Advocates. Versus CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.D.P.Singh, Special PP with Ms. Tarannum Cheema, Advocate. Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Virender Verma, Mr. Gursimran Singh and Mrs. Kamna Vohra, Advocates for Intervenor. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.For detailed orders, see Crl. Rev. P. 438/2010. SURESH KAIT, J JULY 16 2013 RS...
Suresh Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : March 14, 2013 DECIDED ON :16. h July, 2013 + CRL.A. 792/2001 & Crl.M.A.Nos.1734/2002, 638/2003 and 2825/2003 SURESH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The appellant-Suresh impugns a judgment dated 11.09.2001 in Sessions Case No.10/1999 arising out of FIR No.849/1998 under Sections 376 IPC registered at Police Station Sri Nivas Puri by which he was held guilty for committing offence under Section 376/506 IPC. By an order dated 14.09.2001, he was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine `500/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 10.09.1998, he committed rape upon prosecutrix X (assumed name) aged six years inside her house. The appellant lived on the first floor of the premises in question. He had good terms with prosecutrixs family and was a frequent vis...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »