Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahesh Kumar and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 216/2003 Reserved on:13. h May, 2013 Decided on:19. h July, 2013 % MAHESH KUMAR AND ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate with Appellant in person. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 The Appellants, who are the husband, mother-in-law and father-in-law of the deceased Ritu, lay a challenge to the judgment dated 4th April, 2003 whereby they have been convicted for offences under Sections 498A/304B IPC and the order on sentence dated 4th April, 2003 directing them to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years each and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each and in default of payment of fine to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of 15 days under Section 304B IPC. For offence under Section 498A IPC they have been directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for three years each and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each and in default of payment of ...
Mohd Arif Vs. Pramod Tanwar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: July 19, 2013 + CM(M) No.711/2013 MOHD ARIF ..... Petitioner Through Mr.A.S. Anand, Adv. versus PRAMOD TANWAR & ORS Through None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) CM No.10881/2013 Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) No.711/2013 & CM No.10880/2013 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed for setting aside the order dated 5th July, 2013 passed by the ADJ, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, who rejected the application filed by the petitioner under Section 151 CPC.2. The brief facts of the case are that a petition under Section 15 of Delhi Municipal Corporation Act was filed by the respondent No.2 whereby the election of respondent No.1 from Ward No.152 North MCD was challenged on the ground that the respondent No.1 was holding office of profit on the date of election.3. The respondents No.2 to 9 includi...
Archit Krishna Vs. National Law University and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :15. 07.2013 Judgment pronounced on :19. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4147/2012 ARCHIT KRISHNA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.R.K. Handoo and Mr.Yoginder Handoo, Mr. Manish Shukla and Mr. Yogesh Sharma, Advs. Versus NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY & ANR. Through: .... Respondents Mr.Anand Varma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioner before this Court appeared in Common Law Admission Test (CLAT), 2012 conducted by the respondents for the purpose of admission to various national law schools / universities. The said test is conducted by one or the other national law college/university, on a rotational basis. In the application form, the candidates were required to give preference for the universities/colleges participating in the said test. The petitioner was required to choose all the 14 colleges/ universities granting admission on the basis of the aforesaid test, in the order of their preference. The first four ...
Deepak @ Raguvir @ Kallu Vs. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h JULY, 2013 DECIDED ON :19. h JULY, 2013 + CRL.A. 1451/2011 DEEPAK @ RAGUVIR @ KALLU ....Appellant Through : Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate with Mr.Shiv Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate. Versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. AND + CRL.A. 169/2011 BHOLA Through : ....Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : .Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeals stand disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.170/2011 titled Kayum @ Sunil vs. State of Delhi. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE JULY 19 2013/tr...
Harish Kumar and ors. Vs. Seb International Sas and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % O.M.P. 1194/2012 Date of Decision:19. h July, 2013 + # HARISH KUMAR AND ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Milanka Choudhary & Mr. Yash Srivastava, Advocates VERSUS $ * SEB INTERNATIONAL SAS & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Dr. A.M. Singhvi and Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocates with Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: Petitioner no.1 Harish Kumar claims to have been successfully running the business of developing and manufacturing electrical appliances and selling them with the brand name Maharaja Whiteline for over three decades. For carrying on that business he had formed a private limited Company by the name of Maharaja Whiteline Industries Pvt. Ltd. (to be referred hereinafter as the Indian Company) in which the entire shareholding was owned by him and his family members. However, in November, 2011 he and other shareholders decided to...
M/S. Lord Chloro Alkalies Ltd. Vs. Director General of Income Tax (Adm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 07.2013 Pronounced on:19. 07.2013 + W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL. 3645/2013 M/S LORD CHLORO ALKALIES LTD. ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Vinita Sasidharan, Ms. Varsha Banerjee, Sh. Sumeet Batra and Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates. versus DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (ADMN) AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. In these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the orders of the Appellate Authority for Industrial Reconstruction (hereafter AAIFR) under provisions of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereafter SICA) dated 01.04.2009 and 27.09.2012 in Appeal No. 227/2008. By that order, the AAIFR had set aside a scheme W.P.(C) 1915/2013, C.M. APPL.3645/2013 Page 1 formulated unde...
State Bank of India Vs. Md.Shahjahan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:19. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 9057/2011 and CM No.20367/2011 STATE BANK OF INDIA ..... Petitioners Through:Mr.Rajiv Kapur, Advocate versus MD.SHAHJAHAN ..... Respondent Through:Mr.Anuj Kumar Ranjan with Mr.Sunil Kumar Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The respondent before this Court applied to CPIO of the petitioner State Bank of India, seeking information with respect to the marks obtained by him in the written departmental examination, Performance Appraisal Form(PAF) and interview for the promotional examination held on 5 th July, 2009 along with the marks of the last successful candidate. The Central Information Commission, vide impugned order dated 7th September, 2011, directed the petitioner to disclose the marks awarded to the respondent in the written examination, PAF and interview for the promotion examination held on 5th July, 2009 along with marks awarded to the last selected...
Bhateri Devi and anr Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. A. 223/2003 Date of Decision:19. h July, 2013 BHATERI DEVI AND ANR. Through ..... Appellants Mr. Bharat Bhushan Kaushik, Adv. versus STATE OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Ms. Fizani Husain, APP CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. Marriages are made in heaven, is an adage. A bride leaves the parental home to the matrimonial home, leaving behind sweet memories there, with a hope that she will see a new world full of love in her grooms house. She leaves behind not only her memories, but also her surname, gotra and maidenhood. She expects not only to be a daughter-in-law, but a daughter in fact. Alas! The alarming rise in the number of cases involving harassment to the newly wed girls for Crl. A.223.2003 Page 1 of 40 dowry shatters the dreams. In-laws are characterized to be out-laws for perpetrating terrorism which destroys the matrimonial home. The terrorist is dowry, and it is spreading tentacles in eve...
Kayum @ Sunil Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h JULY, 2013 DECIDED ON :19. h JULY, 2013 + CRL.A. 170/2011 & CRL.M.B. 1765/2012 KAYUM @ SUNIL Through : ....Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : + .Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CRL.A. 1451/2011 DEEPAK @ RAGUVIR @ KALLU ....Appellant Through : Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate with Mr.Shiv Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate. versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. AND + CRL.A. 169/2011 BHOLA Through : ....Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through : .Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Kayum @ Sunil (A-1), Deepak @ Raghubir @ Kallu (A-2) and Bhola (A-3) challenge a judgment dated 24.12.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No. 93/2006 arising out of FIR No. 113/2006 PS DBG Road by which A-1 was convicted under Section 392 read with Section 397 IPC and A-2 and A-3 were convicted under Section 392...
Raj Kumar Saraf, Proprietor M/S. Bindal Food Produ Vs. M/S. Vaidya Nan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 86/2008 RAJ KUMAR SARAF, PROPRIETOR M/S. BINDAL FOOD PRODUCTS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Vikas Khera and Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocates Versus M/S. VAIDYA NANDRAM GIGRAJ CHAMARIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate % Date of Decision : July 19, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. By way of this appeal, the Appellant - Raj Kumar Saraf seeks to assail the order dated 19.9.2007 passed by the Copyright Board rectifying the Register of Copyrights by expunging the entry bearing not A-66496/04 relating to the art work of the Appellant.2. The facts leading to the passing of the impugned order by the Copyright Board may be briefly delineated as follows.3. The Respondent - Vaidya Nandram Gigraj Chamaria had filed an application under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957 before the Copyright Board for expunging/delet...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »