Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nikhil Kant Syal and anr. Vs. Committee Golden Forest Limited and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. 07.2013 + W.P.(C) 8539/2011, C.M. APPL. 19312/2011 NIKHIL KANT SYAL AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Versus COMMITTEE GOLDEN FOREST LIMITED AND ANR ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 1399/2010, C.M. APPL. 4306/2010, 5546/2010, 5547/2010, 3988/2013 NATIONAL INVESTOR FORUM REGD. ..... Petitioner Versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1400/2010 NATIONAL INVESTORS FORUM ..... Petitioner Versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Appearance: Sh. Ashok Kumar Singh, Sh. Naresh Kumar Gaur and Sh. H.C. Sharma, Advocates, Item No. 23, for petitioner. Sh. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for Resp. No.1 in Item No.23. Ms. Prachi. V. Sharma, Advocate, for Resp. No.2 in Item No. 23 (Item No.3988/2013) W.P.(C) 85392011, 1399/2010 & 1400/2010 Page 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % W.P.(C) 8539/2011, C.M. APPL. 19312/2011 1. The writ petitioners seek ap...
National Investors Forum Vs. Golden Forests India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. 07.2013 + W.P.(C) 8539/2011, C.M. APPL. 19312/2011 NIKHIL KANT SYAL AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Versus COMMITTEE GOLDEN FOREST LIMITED AND ANR ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 1399/2010, C.M. APPL. 4306/2010, 5546/2010, 5547/2010, 3988/2013 NATIONAL INVESTOR FORUM REGD. ..... Petitioner Versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1400/2010 NATIONAL INVESTORS FORUM ..... Petitioner Versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Appearance: Sh. Ashok Kumar Singh, Sh. Naresh Kumar Gaur and Sh. H.C. Sharma, Advocates, Item No. 23, for petitioner. Sh. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for Resp. No.1 in Item No.23. Ms. Prachi. V. Sharma, Advocate, for Resp. No.2 in Item No. 23 (Item No.3988/2013) W.P.(C) 85392011, 1399/2010 & 1400/2010 Page 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % W.P.(C) 8539/2011, C.M. APPL. 19312/2011 1. The writ petitioners seek ap...
Yoginder @ Guddu Vs. State N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 184/2003 Reserved on:22. d May, 2013 Decided on:22. d July, 2013 % JOGINDER @ JOGA Through ..... Appellant Mr. B.S. Chaudhary, Ms. Chitra Goswami, Ms. Kanta Chaudhary, Advs. with Appellant in custody. versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI Through + ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with SI Sodhan Singh PS Dabri. CRL.A. 193/2003 YOGINDER @ GUDDU Through ..... Appellant Mr. B.S. Chaudhary, Ms. Chitra Goswami, Ms. Kanta Chaudhary, Advs. with Appellant in person. versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State with SI Sodhan Singh PS Dabri. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 The present appeals impugn the judgment dated 24th January, 2003 convicting the Appellants for offences under Section 395/34 IPC and Appellant Yoginder also for offence under Section 397 IPC and the order on sentence dated 24th January, 2003 directing them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs...
Ram Naresh Pandey Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 295/2005 Reserved on:14. h May, 2013 Decided on:22. d July, 2013 % RAM NARESH PANDEY Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Prag Chawla, Mr. Shiv K. Tyagi and Mr. Sanjeev Soni, Advocates. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI Anil Kumar, Anti Corruption Branch. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By the present appeal the Appellant lays a challenge to the judgment dated 15th March, 2003 whereby he has been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short the PC Act) and the order on sentence dated 19th March, 2005 whereby he has been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year each and also to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- on each count and in default of payment of fine to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant contends that though the c...
Smt. Dhanwanti and anr Vs. Anju
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:22. d July, 2013 % + CM(M) No.717/2013 & C.M. No.10939/2013 SMT DHANWANTI & ANR ..Petitioners Through Mr. M.C. Sharma, proxy counsel for Mr. J.S. Arya, Adv. versus ANJU ..Respondent Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) CM No.10940/2013 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) No.717/2013 & C.M. No.10939/2013 (Stay) 1. This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 6th April, 2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in a civil suit filed by the respondent (plaintiff therein) for declaration and permanent injunction against the petitioners (defendants therein) claiming herself to be the owner of the ground floor and one room (front side) at the first floor of the property bearing No. H-366, Shakurpur, JJ Colony, Delhi-110034.2. Pursuant to th...
National Investor Forum Regd. Vs. Golden Forests India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:22. 07.2013 + W.P.(C) 8539/2011, C.M. APPL. 19312/2011 NIKHIL KANT SYAL AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Versus COMMITTEE GOLDEN FOREST LIMITED AND ANR ..... Respondents + W.P.(C) 1399/2010, C.M. APPL. 4306/2010, 5546/2010, 5547/2010, 3988/2013 NATIONAL INVESTOR FORUM REGD. ..... Petitioner Versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. + ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 1400/2010 NATIONAL INVESTORS FORUM ..... Petitioner Versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Appearance: Sh. Ashok Kumar Singh, Sh. Naresh Kumar Gaur and Sh. H.C. Sharma, Advocates, Item No. 23, for petitioner. Sh. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate, for Resp. No.1 in Item No.23. Ms. Prachi. V. Sharma, Advocate, for Resp. No.2 in Item No. 23 (Item No.3988/2013) W.P.(C) 85392011, 1399/2010 & 1400/2010 Page 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % W.P.(C) 8539/2011, C.M. APPL. 19312/2011 1. The writ petitioners seek ap...
National Students Front and anr. Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru University and a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.5262 /2012 22nd July, 2013 % NATIONAL STUDENTS FRONT AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. B.S. Narwal, petitioner No.2 in person. versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the two petitioners. First petitioner is the National Students Front. Second petitioner is Sh. B.S. Narwal who has appeared in person and argued the case on behalf of the petitioners.2. The relief claimed in the writ petition, which on its own was not decipherable, reads as under:(A) May this Honourable Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus to quash an impugned decision of the Jawaharlal Nehru University Vice-Chancellor which is numbered as JNU/LC/ADMNIV/2260 dated 29th May 2012 read with an Office Order Number 117 of 2006 dated 20th...
Sri Surender Singh (Ex.Constable) Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 19, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4500/2013 SRI SURENDER SINGH (EX. CONSTABLE) ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate for Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. While seeking appointment as a Constable (Ex.) in Delhi Police the petitioner submitted a matriculation certificate issued by the Board of High School & Intermediate Education recording his date of birth as November 27, 1971. A complaint was received that the certificate produced was forged and fabricated. The department conducted a preliminary inquiry and chanced upon a Class-X examination record conducted by the Central Board of Secondary Education in the year 1978-79 which evidenced that the petitioner had cleared the Board examination as a stude...
Commissioner of Income Tax: Delhi -i Vs. Bharti Airtel Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
$~2. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 294/2013 Date of decision:19. h July, 2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX: DELHI -I ..... Appellant Through Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel & Ms. Anshul Sharma, Advocate. versus BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This appeal by the Revenue, which pertains to Assessment Year 2005-06, has to be dismissed in view of the authoritative pronouncement of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax versus Alagendran Finance Limited, (2007) 293 ITR 1 (SC).2. Relevant facts in brief may be noticed. Return filed by the assessee for Assessment Year 2005-06 was taken up for scrutiny and income was assessed at Rs.860,18,30,950/- vide assessment order dated 31st December, 2007 after the setting off of brought forward loses and unabsorbed depreciation amounting to Rs.1941,17,35,146/-.3. There appears t...
Mr. Sangit Agrawal Vs. Mrs. Praveen Anand and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
$~A-23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 07.2013 Decided on :19. 07.2013 CS(OS) 2039/2008 MR. SANGIT AGRAWAL Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.C.S.Yadav, Adv. Versus MRS. PRAVEEN ANAND & ANR. ..... Defendants Through Ms.Shobhna Takiar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the present Suit seeking a decree of Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell dated 28th September, 2006 and for directions to the defendant to execute all necessary documents of sale in favour of the plaintiff as per the said Agreement.2. The brief facts of the case as set out by the plaintiff in the Plaint are that defendants approached the plaintiff, that defendant No.1 is the sole and exclusive owner of Plot No.143, Pocket-6, block 8 Sector 28 Rohini, PhaseIV, Residential Scheme, measuring 60 sq. meters and allotted by Delhi Development Authority. It is stated that defendant No.2 claimed to be the General Power of Attorney holder of defendant No....
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »