Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madhu Devi Vs. National Scheduled Caste Finance and Development Cor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W. P. (C) 8865/2009 22nd July, 2013 % MADHU DEVI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Tarun Khowal, Advocate. Versus NATIONAL SCHEDULED CASTE FINANCE & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jagat Singh, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, compassionate appointment is sought by the petitioner with the respondent No. 1/National Scheduled Caste Finance & Development Corporation. Erstwhile petitioner was Ms. Madhu Devi, wife of the late Sh. Amar Singh, who died in harness. Ms. Jyoti, the daughter, was subsequently substituted as a petitioner by the order of this Court dated 12.02.2013.2. Admittedly, there is a policy for the compassionate appointment of the respondent No. 1 and the relevant extract of this policy reads as under : EMPLOYMENT OF DEPENDENT FAMILY MEMBERS OF EMPLOYEE WHO DIES IN HARNESS A dependent (wife/son/u...
Ganga Sharan Dhawan Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :22. July, 2013 + CRL.A. 790/2011 & Crl.M.B.No.1119/2011 and Crl.M.A.No.19753/2012 GANGA SHARAN DHAWAN ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Sikander Arora, Advocate, with appellant present in person. versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. Mr.S.L.Luthra, Advocate for the Complainant. Complainant present in person. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Ganga Sharan Dhawan (the appellant) challenges a judgment dated 19.05.2011 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.238/1/10 arising out of FIR No. 183/2008 registered at police station Rajouri Garden by which he was convicted under Section 498A IPC. By an order dated 23.05.2011, he was sentenced to undergo RI for two years with fine `50,000/-. Out of total fine, `45,000/- were to be paid as compensation to the victim.2. The appellant was married to Sunita Dhawan on 23.05.1987. A female child was born to the complai...
Wuxe Zhang and anr. Vs. Subhash Agarwal and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :22. 07.2013 + CS(OS) 1608/2010 WUXE ZHANG & ANR Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sangal, Advocate versus SUBHASH AGARWAL & ANR Through: NEMO ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) The plaintiff has filed the present suit to seek the reliefs of injunction, passing of, copyright infringement, rendition of accounts, delivery up and damages against the defendants. The case of the plaintiff is that it is the prior user and adopter of the trademark GFIVE, which has been adopted by the plaintiff since 01.09.2008. The defendant has been using the mark, XFIVE which is phonetically, visually similar and deceptively similar to the plaintiffs mark, GFIVE. The user of the defendant is in the same class of goods i.e. class 35 in which plaintiffs mark is registered. The plaintiff and the defendants are using their respective marks in respect of mobile pho...
Rajeev Goyal and ors. Vs. Sanjeev Goyal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 07.2013 Pronounced on:22. 07.2013 + FAO (OS) 295/2013, C.M. NO. 9523/2013 RAJEEV GOYAL AND ORS. ...... Appellants Through: Ms. Meenakshi Arora with Sh. Mohit. D. Ram, Advocates. versus SANJEEV GOYAL AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Virender Goswami with Ms. Soni Singh, Advocates, for Resp. Nos. 1-5. Sh. Rakesh Khanna with Sh. Rakesh Ojha and Sh. Pradyuman Sewar, Advocates, for Resp. Nos. 6-14. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI % MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT 1 The present arbitration appeal is directed against an order dated 10.05.2013 of the learned Single Judge made under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) in OMP No.777 of 2011, originally preferred by the first five Respondents (hereafter SG group). The Appellants claim to be aggrieved by the said order to the extent the learned Single Judge has declined to make orders on their applicati...
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board Vs. Sh. Pushpendra Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. 07.2013 W.P.(C) No.4048/2012 DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD..... Petitioner Through:Ms.Zubeda Begum with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocates versus SH. PUSHPENDRA SINGH ..... Respondent Through:Mr.Sumit Singh, Amicus Curiae with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The respondent before this Court appeared in the examination held by the petitioner Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board for recruitment of TGT Physical Education teacher. The petitioner was declared unsuccessful in the said examination. Soon after declaration of the result, he submitted an application to the PIO of the petitioner, seeking a copy of his answer sheet in Part-II(Main) of the said examination. Vide communication dated 4th April, 2011, the PIO declined to make the copy of the answer sheet available to the respondent. Being aggrieved from the order passed by the PIO, the respondent filed an ...
S.K.Tripathi Vs. Secy. Agriculture Produce Mkt. Committee Board and
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 5515/1998 22nd July, 2013 S.K.TRIPATHI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Rajat Gaur, Adv. VERSUS SECY. AGRICULTURE PRODUCE MKT. COMMITTEE BOARD & ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Vibhav Misra, Advocte CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioner who was appointed as a Group C employee in respondent-Agricultural Produce Market Committee Board. Petitioner who is present in person states that in para 3 of the writ petition there is a typing mistake that petitioner was appointed as Group D employee.2. Petitioner was dismissed on the basis of charge that he took bribe of Rs.2 from a driver.3. In the present case, the issue will not be of taking a bribe, but the issue will be of regularization of casual employees. Admittedly, petitioner was not a regular or permanent employee of the respondent/ Agricultural Produce Market Com...
Nand Kishore Sharma Vs. Delhi Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Ani ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d July, 2013 % + RFA NO.284/2011 NAND KISHORE SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Tyagi, Adv. Versus DELHI SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Sonia Arora with Mr. Varun Gupta, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J CM No.9968/2011 (for exemption).1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. CM No.9967/2011 (of the appellant to appeal as an indigent person).3. The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree dated 29th January, 2011 of the learned Addl. District Judge-13 (Central), Delhi of dismissal of his suit for recovery of Rs.19,70,000/- from the respondent no.1 and its Chairman impleaded as respondent no.2. The appeal is accompanied with an application under Order 33 Rule 3 of the CPC for permission to appeal as an indigent person stating that the appellant/applicant had been retire...
Lalit Kumar and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 6434/2010 22nd July, 2013 LALIT KUMAR & ORS. Through: .....Petitioners Mr. P.S.Bindra, Adv. VERSUS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, standing counsel for GNCTD with Ms. Sana Ansari, Adv. for R-1 and 2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by 12 petitioners. Out of all these 12 petitioners, 9 were aspirants to contractual posts of dressers with the respondent no.2, contractual appointment being for a period of only 11 months. Two petitioners were aspirants for the post of Staff Nurse and one petitioner was aspirant to the post of Auxiliary Nurse Midwife (ANM). The contention raised on behalf of the petitioners is simple. According to the petitioners as per the advertisement in question, filed at page 26 of the paper-book, there was a requirement of minimum qualifications for a candidate who...
Asha Rani Vs. Manghi Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d July, 2013 % + RFA 330/1999 ASHA RANI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. M.M. Singh with Mr. S.K. Singh, Advs. versus MANGHI LAL ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.None has appeared for the respondent inspite of the matter having been passed over and having been shown on the Board of this Court for a considerable time.2. The appeal is of the year 1999 and is listed in the Advance Cause List of today, on todays date being given as far back as on 7 th May, 2013. Though none had appeared for the respondent on 7 th May, 2013 also but the date of 7th May, 2013 was given in the presence of the counsel for the respondent on 6th March, 2013. It is thus not deemed expedient to adjourn the matter awaiting the respondent and the counsel for the appellant has been heard and the Trial Court record perused.3. The appeal impugns the judgment and the decree dated 9 th April, 1999...
Niranjan Singh Vs. C.B.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A.45/2003 Reserved on:16. h May, 2013 Decided on:22. d July, 2013 % Niranjan Singh Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rakesh Dahiya and Mr. Dilbagh Singh, Advs. versus C.B.I. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. R.V. Sinha, Standing counsel with Ms. Sangita Rai, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 The Appellant impugns the judgment dated 21st January, 2003 whereby he has been convicted for offences punishable under Section 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of Prevent of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short the PC Act) and order on sentence dated 22nd January, 2003 whereby he has been directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for four years with a fine of Rs.500/- each under Sections 7 and 13(2) of PC Act and in default of payment of fine to further undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for three months on each count.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant contends that the learned Trial Court erroneously relied up...
- ‹ Prev
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- Next ›
- Last »