Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and ors. Vs. Mahavir Prasad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : July 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4682/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate With Mr.Pradeep Kumar Singh, Advocate versus MAHAVIR PRASAD Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Padma Kumar S., Advocate W.P.(C) 4683/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate With Mr.Pradeep Kumar Singh, Advocate versus MAHAVIR PRASAD Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Padma Kumar S., Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Respondent Mahavir Prasad is a member of the Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Service. Working as a Section Officer the next promotional post was that of a Deputy Director. Notwithstanding he being eligible for promotion and coming with the zone of consideration for the vacancy year 2002-2003 he could not earn a promotion because of the fact that the seniority of Section Officers wa...
Devinder Singh Vs. Virender Aran
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: Pronounced on: + 11.07.2013 29.07.2013 CS(OS) 2589/2011 DEVINDER SINGH Through Versus VIRENDER ARAN Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Vijay Kr. Gupta with Mr. Mohit Gupta and Mr. Sandeep Kaushik, Advocates ..... Defendant Mr. Karnail Singh and Ms. Snigdha, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the present Suit seeking Specific Performance of the Agreement to Sell dated 4.3.2011 with respect to property bearing Flat No. C-8/54-A, Keshav Puram, Delhi-110035.2. The plaintiff in the plaint contends that by an Agreement dated 4.3.2011 the defendant agreed to sell the said property with freehold rights of the land under the property for consideration of Rs.29,50,000/-. At the time of the Agreement the plaintiff is stated to have made an advance payment of Rs.3 lacs and a receipt to the said effect was executed by the defendant. The balance amount of Rs.26,50,000/- was agreed to be paid by th...
Pradeep Kumar Gupta Vs. P.O. Labour Court and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % W.P.(C) No.1137/1999 Date of Decision:29. h July, 2013 + # PRADEEP KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Manchanda, Advocate versus $ * P.O.LABOUR COURT & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. Dinesh Madan, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN JUDGMENT P.K. BHASIN, J: The petitioner-workman joined M/s Air France, respondent no.2, in the year 1964 in its Telecommunication Department as a Teleprinter Operator, which post fell in category PLC-2 under Clerical Staff category, and subsequently he was re-designated as Teleprinter Operator Assistant in 1969 after being put into PLC-3 category.2. After serving respondent no.2 almost two decades he was all of a sudden retrenched w.e.f. 25th February, 1983 on the ground that as a result of computerisation of the Telecommunication Department his services as a manual teleprinter operator became had become surplus. At that time the petitioner was offered money which according to...
Degremont Limited Vs. Kolkatta Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 03.07.2013 29.07.2013 CS(OS) 276/2012 DEGREMONT LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Amit Dayal, Advocate versus KOLKATTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Manisha Parmar, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.IA No.6224/2013 1. This application has been filed by the Defendant under Order VII, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC for short) for rejection of the plaintiffs suit for recovery of amount of Rs 88,80,107, on the grounds that this Court is not vested with the territorial jurisdiction to try this Suit.2. The Plaintiff is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at New Delhi and head office at Gurgaon, Haryana. The defendant is a body corporate constituted by the West Bengal Act, LIX 1980.Vide Memorandum of Agreement (MOA hereinafter) dated 22.08.2001, the defendant awarded a contract to...
Shaik Abdul Hameed Vs. Delhi Developmennt Authority and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
#26 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 450/2013 & CM APPL. 876/2013, 3920/2013 SHAIK ABDUL HAMEED Through ..... Petitioner Ms. Vasundhara Pathak Masoodi, Advocate versus DELHI DEVELOPMENNT AUTHORITY & OTHERS Through ..... Respondents Mr. Arun Birbal with Mr. D.K. Singh, Advocates for R-1/DDA. Mr. Manish Sharma with Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advocates for R-2, 3 and 6. Ms. Ferida Satarawala, Advocate for R-4 and 5. Date of Decision:29. h July, 2013. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral):1. Present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for quashing and setting aside the letter dated 19th November, 2012 by virtue of which respondent-DDA granted permission to respondent no. 2 to install a lift in Block No. C-4, Usha Niketan, Safderjung Development Area, New Delhi.2. Ms. Vasundhara Pathak Masoodi, learned counsel for petitioner contends that respondent-DDAs own procedure for issuance of NOC for installation o...
Ranbir @ Kuddu and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: July 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: July 29,2013 + CRL.APPEAL 258 1998 INDER SINGH Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Vikrant Saini, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr.Saahil Mongia, Ms.Priyanka Kapoor, Mr.Mohd. Anand, Advocates. CRL.APPEAL 369 1998 RANBIR & KUDDU & ANR .....Appellants Represented by: Mr.Vikrant Saini, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr.Saahil Mongia, Ms.Priyanka Kapoor, Mr.Mohd. Anand, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.CRL.APPEAL 258...
Ester Industries Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi Iv
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
$~16. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 702/2007 Date of decision:29. h July, 2013 ESTER INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr. R. Santhanam, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI IV ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we frame the following substantial question of law: (1) Whether the Assessing Officer could have made prima facie adjustment and held that minimum alternative tax under Section 115JA was payable by the assessee and compute and calculate the same under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? (2) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) exceeded his jurisdiction under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by modifying his earlier order? 2. The assessee is a company a...
inder Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: July 08, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: July 29,2013 + CRL.APPEAL 258 1998 INDER SINGH Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.Vikrant Saini, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr.Saahil Mongia, Ms.Priyanka Kapoor, Mr.Mohd. Anand, Advocates. CRL.APPEAL 369 1998 RANBIR & KUDDU & ANR .....Appellants Represented by: Mr.Vikrant Saini, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr.Saahil Mongia, Ms.Priyanka Kapoor, Mr.Mohd. Anand, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.CRL.APPEAL 258...
Mahavir Prasad Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : July 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 4682/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate With Mr.Pradeep Kumar Singh, Advocate versus MAHAVIR PRASAD Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Padma Kumar S., Advocate W.P.(C) 4683/2013 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate With Mr.Pradeep Kumar Singh, Advocate versus MAHAVIR PRASAD Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Padma Kumar S., Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Respondent Mahavir Prasad is a member of the Armed Forces Headquarters Civil Service. Working as a Section Officer the next promotional post was that of a Deputy Director. Notwithstanding he being eligible for promotion and coming with the zone of consideration for the vacancy year 2002-2003 he could not earn a promotion because of the fact that the seniority of Section Officers wa...
ilham Zadi Vs. Jamia Millia Islamia and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:29. 07.2013 W.P.(C) 4731/2013 ILHAM ZADI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Alamgir, Adv. versus JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms Jaya Goyal and Ms Manpreet Kaur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner before this Court is a student of respondent No. 1-Jamai Millia Islamia University and is pursuing his 4th year degree course in BDS. On 28.05.2013, he was found sitting in boys common room and filling up some forms. A number of admission forms, loose photographs of students aspiring for admission in BDS course, ink pad and scotch tape were recovered.2. A show cause notice dated 31.05.2013 was issued to him on the following allegations: ii. You were being helped in filling up the forms by Mr Shazeb, working for Royal Studio, although he was not allowed to go to the boys common room. On enquiry, he admitted that you had called him to submit the forms of the stu...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »