Delhi Court July 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Turn browsing into brief-ready notes

Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.

Jul 31 2013

Shanta Chopra Vs. Uma Bahadur

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No. 950 of 2013 Reserved on: July 15, 2013 Decision on: July 31, 2013 SHANTA CHOPRA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Arun Malik, Mr. Subhiksh Vasudev & Mr. Srivats Kaushal, Advocates versus UMA BAHADUR Through: .....Defendant Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Ms. Zehra Khan & Ms. Gauri Puri, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 31 07.2013 CS (OS) No. 950 of 2013 with IA No. 8335 of 2013 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC), IA No. 8337 of 2013 (under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC), IA 833.of 2013 (under Order XXXII Rule 15 CPC) and IA No. 10257 of 2013 (by the Defendant for recall of order dated 20th May 2013) 1. The present suit has been filed for a declaration and permanent injunction against the Defendant, Mrs. Uma Bahadur. The prayer in the suit is that a Release Deed dated 24th May 1999 and a Rectification Deed dated 17th November 1999 stated to have been executed by Mrs. Shanta Chopra, in whose name the present suit has been filed, in favour of t...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2013

Narendra Kumar and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2013

$~ 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.3820/2013 Date of decision:31. t July, 2013 % NARENDRA KUMAR & OTHERS ..... Petitioners Through : Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Satya Saharawat, Adv. for Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioners, who are the promotee officers, are working either as Overseers or as Superintendents with the Border Road Organization. This petition has been filed by the petitioners praying to pay salary in same pay scale/pay band with grade pay as was paid to Ghan Shyam Vishwakarma pursuant to the decision passed by the Gauhati High Court (Aizawl Bench) in W.P.(C)No.51/2009.2. The Border Road Organization implemented the recommendations of the 5th Central Pay Commission with effect from January 1, 1996 and started paying a higher salary to WP(C) No.3820/2013 page 1 of 3 Overseers and Superintendents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2013

Neeraj Chopra Vs. Beena S. Aggarwal and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: July 31, 2013 + CM(M) No.765/2013 NEERAJ CHOPRA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Tarun Rana, Adv. with Mr.Puneet Dhawan, Adv. versus BEENA S. AGGARWAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) Caveats No.656/2013 & 657/2013 Since the counsel for the respondents has appeared, caveats stand disposed of. CM No.11682/2013 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. CM(M) No.765/2013 & CM No.11681/2013 1. The petitioner Neeraj Chopra has filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 20th July, 2013 by the Additional District Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, in Suit No.172/2013 whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was dismissed.2. Brief facts of the case are that on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2013

The Commissioner of Income Tax-xvi Vs. Sh. Fumio Goto

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 07.2013 Decided on:31. 07.2013 + ITA 379/2007 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX XVI ....Appellant versus SH. SASHI MUKUNDAN ..... Respondent + ITA 387/2008 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX XVI ...Appellant versus MR. SHORT DONALD ..... Respondent + ITA 212/2009 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus MR. FUMIO GOTO ...Appellant ..... Respondent + ITA 15/2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XIV .....Appellant versus MR. DUNCAN ETHERINGTION ..... Respondent + ITA 351/2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI ..... Appellant versus SH. YASHIMITSU ZAUTSU ..... Respondent + ITA 408/2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI ..... Appellant versus SH. IKUJU YABUKI ..... Respondent + ITA 450/2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI ITA 379/2007 & connected matters ..... Appellant Page 1 versus SHRI TOSHIHORU SUNAHARA ..... Respondent + ITA 534/2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XVI ..... Appellant versus SOJITZ CORPORATION AS AGENT ..... Respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2013

The Commissioner of Income Tax-xvi Vs. Sh. March Francois Jean Soulacr ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2013

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2013

Kavita and anr. Vs. Samunder Singh and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t July, 2013 % + RFA 56/2011 KAVITA & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Tarun Gupta, Adv. versus SAMUNDER SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Geeta Mehrotra, Adv. for R-1 to 6. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 31 st August, 2010 of the Addl. District Judge, Central-14, Delhi of dismissal of suit No.483/2009 filed by the appellants for partition of residential property situated in Village Malikpur, Post Office Ujwa, Tehsil Najafgarh, Delhi and agricultural land measuring 16 kila vide Khata Khatoni No.35/33, village Malikpur Zere, Tehsil Najafgarh, Delhi.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and the appeal admitted for hearing. The counsel for the respondents gave a statement as recorded in the order dated 25th November, 2011, not to sell or alienate the suit property without permission of this Court. Though the parties were referred to ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2013

Nau Nihal Singh Rana Vs. Sunil Kumar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No. 1359 of 2011 Reserved on: July 3, 2013 Decision on: July 31, 2013 NAU NIHAL SINGH RANA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. A.K. Behra and Mr. Gyaneshwar, Advocates. versus SUNIL KUMAR ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 31 07.2013 IA No. 442 of 2012 (under Order VII Rule 11CPC) 1. This is an application by the Defendant seeking rejection of the plaint on the ground that the plaint does not give rise to any cause of action.2. The aforementioned suit has been filed by the Plaintiff claiming damages and compensation in the sum of Rs.25 lakhs along with interst @ 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realisation. According to the Plaintiff, the Defendant is liable to pay him the aforementioned sum as damages and compensation for defamation.3. The Plaintiff states that he was working as Chief Personnel Officer with Northern Railway from 4th September 1995 to 31st...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2013

Sunil Kapoor Vs. Harveen Kaur and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-31-2013

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t July, 2013 % + RFA 251/2011 & CM No.8990/2011 (u/O 4.R-27 CPC) SUNIL KAPOOR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Akshay Makhija and Ms. Sanjugeeta Moktan, Advocates. Versus HARVEEN KAUR & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjiv Kakra, Mr. Irfan Ahmed and Mr. Bheem Sain Jain, Advocates CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.The appeal impugns the judgment and decree (dated 31 st January, 2011 of the Court of Additional District Judge, Central-10, Delhi in Suit No.153/2009) on admissions for ejectment of the appellant from the first floor of property No.246, Greater Kailash, Part-I, New Delhi earlier in the tenancy of the appellant.2. Notice of the appeal was issued and the appeal posted for final hearing and the statement of the respondents, not to execute the impugned judgment and decree, was recorded. Vide subsequent order dated 28th September, 2011 the appellant,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2013