Delhi Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Encyclopaedia Britannica India Pvt Ltd Vs. M/S Ma Radha Trust and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: June 08, 2013 + O.M.P. No.581/2013 ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA INDIA PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Aman Nandrajog, Adv. versus M/S MA RADHA TRUST & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.V.P.Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Shakeel Ahmed & Mr.Deepak K.Tyagi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the abovementioned petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.2. The case of the petitioner is that respondent No.1 contacted the petitioner and offered to show the premises to the petitioner, i.e. Ground Floor, A-41, Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area, Main Mathura Road, New Delhi-110044 admeasuring 6720 Sq.ft. along with parking space for 3 cars, for leasing the same out to the petitioner on a fully furnished basis. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner agreed to take the demised premises on lease from respondent No.1 on a m...
Virender Pal Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: June 5, 2013 Date of Decision: June 7, 2013 % + Bail App. No.1013/2013 VIRENDER PAL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. H.S. Chaudhary, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State. SI Manmohan Ahuja, P.S. Model Town. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is an application filed by one Virender Pal under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying for anticipatory bail in case FIR No.158/12 registered in P.S. Model Town under Section 498A/406 of the Indian Penal Code.2. According to the FIR, the applicant married Geeta Rajeshwari, the complainant on 12.03.2011. The father of the complainant had spent a huge amount of money in the marriage and in giving dowry articles to the applicant. After the marriage also, the in-laws of the complainant were pressurizing the father of the complainant to give a sum of `2 lacs and a car. When the complainant brought up this i...
Opus Group Ab Vs. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:7. h June, 2013 % + W.P.(C) No.2999/2013 & CM No.7146/2013, CM No.6675/2013 & CM No.6759/2013 OPUS GROUP AB Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shyamal Kumar, Advocate Versus MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Amrit Pal Singh and Mr. Aditya Malhotra, Advocates for UOI Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Varun Kumar and Ms. Meghna Mishra, Advocates for Applicant in CM No.6759-60/2013 for impleadment CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. As per order dated 31 st May, 2013, the abovementioned three applications are listed for hearing. Parties have made their submissions in these applications as well as in the main writ petition.2. Brief facts leading up to filing of the present petition are enunciated as under: a) The petitioner herein claims to be a multinational company incorpor...
Mohinder Pal Singh Sahni Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: June 06, 2013 Date of Decision: June 07, 2013 % + Bail Appln.1017/2013 MOHINDER PAL SINGH SAHNI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Hariharan, Sr.Advocate with Mr. M.P.Sinha, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Mukesh Gupta, APP for State. Inspector Dinesh Kumar, P.S. Tilak Marg CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.: This is an application filed by one Mohinder Pal Singh Sahni under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in case F.I.R. No.308/2005 registered in P.S. Tilak Marg under Section 420/467/468/471 of the IPC.2. The facts giving rise to the filing of the bail application in brief are that in the year 1997 the complainant Harnam Singh filed a complaint against the applicant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant is a Non-resident Indian settled in Kuwait. In connection with the complaint, the applicant filed exemption applications seeking exemption from personal appearance on 26.5.199...
Hamdard National Foundation and anr. Vs. HussaIn Dalal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: June 07, 2013 + CS(OS) No.1225/2013 HAMDARD NATIONAL FOUNDATION & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.N.K.Anand, Advocate , Mr.Pravin Anand, Mr.Dhruv Anand & Mr.Achuthan Sreekumar, Advs. Versus HUSSAIN DALAL & ORS Through ..... Defendants None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. I.A.No.9923/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of.2. I.A.No.9924/2013 (U/s 149 r/w Section 151 CPC) By this application, the learned counsel for the plaintiffs craves leave to extend the time to make good deficient court fee. Mr. Anand submits that the same would be deposited within two weeks as the steps have already been taken. In view of statement made by learned counsel for the plaintiffs, the prayer is allowed. The application is disposed of.3. CS(OS) No.1225/2013 Issue summons to the defendants, on filing of process fee and Regd. A.D. Covers within a week...
Abhishek JaIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 06. 2013 Date of Decision:07. 06.2013 % BAIL APPLN. 926/2013 & Crl. M.A. 1116/2013 (Interim Bail) ABHISHEK JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mrs. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manish Jain, Mr. Ankur Garg, Mr. Sougata Ganguly, Mr. Deepak Bansal and Ms. Saaila, Advs. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.: This application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by one Abhishek Jain in case FIR No.128 of 2013 registered in PS Saraswati Vihar, North West District under Section 376/420/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.2. The application has been filed in the following circumstances. The complainant, Nirmal Kaur alias Neha Gabree, is aged 24 years and is working as Assistant Accounts Manager in a firm in Delhi. She got married to the applicant on 4.3.2013 in the Arya Samaj Mandir Trust. The marriage was also registered by the Registrar o...
Gopal Krishan Dhir and ors. Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council Through It ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: June 05, 2013 + LPA No.427/2013 GOPAL KRISHAN DHIR & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.V.L.Madan, Adv. versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCILTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through Mr.Manoj K. Singh, Adv. with Mr.Arpan Behl, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The appellants have filed the present Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment dated 21st May, 2013 which was passed in W.P.(C) No.706/2013. Earlier, in the judgment dated 5th march, 2012 passed by the learned Single Judge and the judgment/order dated 30th March, 2012 passed by the Division Bench, it was observed that in case the Heritage Gole Market Building was to be retained as a market, then the shopkeepers of Gole Market including the appellants be given preference, and in case, it was to be converted into a Museum, then they were to be offered alternate shops...
Nikhil Mehta and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: June 03, 2013 Date of Decision: June 05, 2013 % + W.P.(CRL) No. 710/2013 NIKHIL MEHTA & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sunil Malhotra and Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. Through: ... Respondents Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for State with Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Advocate. Mr. P.K. Sharma, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate. Mr. Saleem Ahmed, ASC. SI Rajender, P.S. Geeta Colony. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This writ petition has been filed by two advocates of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.2. The events giving rise to the filing of the present writ petition are somewhat gloomy and unfortunate. It would appear that on the intervening night of 1st and 2nd May, 2013, the petitioners had returned after attending some function and had parked thei...
Kartar Singh Vs. Major Murlidhar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. REV. P. 338/2013 KARTAR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Kishore Gojoria, Mr. Vikram Gujral and Mr. Anil K. Gujral, Advocates. versus MAJOR MURLIDHAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Sapra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gaurang Kanth and Ms. Snigdha Sharma, Advocates. Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP along with SI Pawan Kumar, P.S. Vasant Kunj. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR ORDER 05 06.2013 CRL. M.A. 9248/2013 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL. REV. P. 338/2013 1. This is a criminal revision petition filed against the order dated 22.05.2013 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi. The prayer in the petition is for setting aside the aforesaid order and for restoration of the order passed by the trial judge on 30.01.2013 on the application filed by the revision petitioner under section 456(1) of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.164/1989.2. The present petition has ...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs. Gagan Sahni
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-03-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: June 03, 2013 + FAO(OS) No.291/2013 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through Mr.Sunil Goel, Adv. with Mr.Susheel Bhartiya, Adv. versus GAGAN SAHNI ..... Respondent Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) CM No.9406/2013 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM No.9407/2013 (for condonation of delay of 21 days in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing is condoned. The application is disposed of. CM No.9405/2013 (for condonation of delay of 221 days in filing) 1. The appellant has filed the appeal under Section XXXVII of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the orders dated 4th May, 2012 and 30th July, 2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP No.568/2006 whereby the objections filed by the appellant under Section 34 of th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›