Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi and District Cricket Association Vs. Rajnish Aggarwal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + F.A.O. No.146 of 2013 & C.M. No.4806/2013 (for stay) Decided on :31. t May, 2013 DELHI & DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION Appellants Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P.D. Gupta & Ms. Sunita Tiwari, Advocates. Versus RAJNISH AGGARWAL & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. N.N. Aggarwal, Mr. Rohit Gandhi & Mr. Varun Garg, Advocates for R-1 & 2. Mr. V.P. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harikishan, Advocate for R-2 to 7. Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Advocate for R-12. WITH + F.A.O. No.145 of 2013 & C.M. No.4803/2013 (for stay) RAVINDER MANCHANDA & ORS. Appellants Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harikishan, Advocate. Versus RAJNISH AGGARWAL & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. N.N. Aggarwal, Mr. Rohit Gandhi & Mr. Varun Garg, Advocates for R-1 & 2. Ms. Ritika Godhwani, Advocate for R-5. Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Advocate for R-7. Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P.D. Gupta & Ms. Sunita Tiwari, Advocates for R-16. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K...
State Vs. Chaturbhuj Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL L.P. No. 570/2011 Reserved on:04. h February, 2013 Date of Decision:31. t May, 2013 % STATE ....Appellants Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP. Versus CHATURBHUJ SINGH Through Respondent Mr. Yogesh Swaroop, Mr. Dushyant Swaroop and Mr. B.K. Roy, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.: The present leave to appeal by the State questions judgment dated 20th July, 2007 passed in Sessions Case No.40/2010 arising out of FIR No.114/2006 Police Station Kashmere Gate. By the said judgment, respondent Chaturbhuj Singh has been acquitted from the charge under Section 304 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The respondent was charged for culpable homicide not amounting to murder by firing and killing from his rifle Sarvesh Sapra on 9th March, 2006 at about 3.15 p.m.. It is an undisputed position and the prosecution case is that the respondent was posted as a security guard at Punjab and Sin...
Morgan Securities and Credits Pvt. Ltd. Vs. B P L Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :21. t May, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on:31. t May, 2013 % + Arb. A. No.9/2013 MORGAN SECURITIES & CREDITS PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Simran Mehta, Ms.Yogita Sunaria and Mr.Tarun, Advs. versus B P L LTD. Through ..... Respondent Mr.Dhananjay Joshi, Adv. with Ms.Kavitha Damodaran and Ms.Mekhala, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Prior to the present appeal, the appellant filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for interim protection, being OMP No.865/2012. The case set up in the said OMP against the respondent was that the respondent was generating such huge sums of money so as to divert several crores of rupees to its subsidiary companies, in such a short span of time. The appellant apprehends that the respondent is selling, disposing off and/or encumbering its assets. A s...
Nestle India Limited and anr Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 4832/1995 NESTLE INDIA LIMITED & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Desai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Batra, Ms. Mallika Joshi, Mr. Amit Agarwal, Ms. Amrita Chatterjee and Mr. Rajan Narain, Advocates. For the Respondent :Mr. Rajeev Mehra, ASG with Ms. Meera Bhatia and Mr. Ashish Virmani, Advocates for R-1/UOI Mr. C.V. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for the Intervener (ACASH) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. By way of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, inter alia, are seeking the following reliefs:- (i) Declare the provisions of Sections 2(1)(f), 6 (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the Infant Milk Substitutes, feeding Bottles and Infant foods (Regulation of Prod...
Mukesh @ Jurra Vs. the State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :31. t MAY, 2013 + CRL.A.1407/2011 & CRL.M.B.1978/2011 MUKESH @ JURRA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajender Yadav, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. SI A.Singh, PS Mahindra Park. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Mukesh @ Jurra challenges judgment dated 01.08.2011 in Sessions Case No.1210/2010 arising out of FIR No.88/2009 under Sections 307/394/397/34 IPC PS Mahindra Park by which he and Karan @ Palak and Deepak were convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 394 read with Section 397 IPC. Vide order dated 12.08.2011, the appellant was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine ` 25,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 14.12.2009 at about 08.00 P.M. at Service Road near GTK Depot he, Karan @ Palak and Deepak in furtherance of common intention, voluntarily caused hurt to Sanjay and rob...
Sarita Arora Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3906/2011 Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 SARITA ARORA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Mohd. Irfan, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR 1 By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 10.3.2011 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate framed the charge against the petitioner under Section 411/482/34 IPC and order dated 25.7.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge upheld the order of charge passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate.2. Arguing the present petition Mr.Mohd. Irfan, counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case even after the investigation against her had stopped ba...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Cellular Operators Association of Ind ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. 04.2013. Decided on :31. 05.2013 LPA 200/2013 and CM 5410/2013 ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICES and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Ramji Srinivasan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Umang Gupta, Mr.Faraz Maqbool, Ms.Kabita Das, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED and ORS... Respondents Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Mr.Siddharth Tyagi, Mr.Amit Singh, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Ms.Sweta Gupta, Advs. for BSNL/R-1. Mrs.Sangeeta Singh, Adv. with Mr.Kumar Rajan Mishra, Advs. for TRAI/R-3 + LPA 201/2013 and CM Nos. 5418/2013 & 6578/2013 CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr.Manjul Bajpai, Mr.Sarvajeet Kumar Thakur, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED .....Respondent Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr. Abhishek Kuma...
Reliace Broadcast Network Ltd. Vs. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:29. h April, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on:31. t May, 2013 % + ARB.P. 395/2012 RELIANCE BROADCAST NETWORK LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Mr. Kunal Tandon & Mr. V.Gupta, Advocates versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarun Johri, Advocate + ARB.P. 359/2012 RELIANCE BROADCAST NETWORK LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Mr. Kunal Tandon & Mr. V.Gupta, Advocates versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarun Johri, Advocate + ARB.P. 393/2012 RELIANCE BROADCAST NETWORK LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Mr. Kunal Tandon & Mr. V.Gupta, Advocates versus DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarun Johri, Advocate + ARB.P. 394/2012 RELIANCE BROADCAST NETWORK LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Ad...
Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 ITA 1732/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ....Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN .Respondent ITA 1733/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN ..... Respondent ITA 1734/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN ..... Respondent ITA 451/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent ITA 779/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr N.P. Sahni. For the Respondent : Mr O.P. Dua, Sr. Adv. with Ms Babita CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.These are appeals which have been preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter refer...
Baij Nath Mittal Vs. State Thr.C.B.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :13. h MAY, 2013 DECIDED ON :31. t MAY, 2013 + CRL.A. 1037/2012 & CRL.M.B.Nos.285/2013 & 1633/2012 BAIJ NATH MITTAL Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Rebecca M.John, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kushdeep Gaur & Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocates. versus STATE THR.C.B.I. Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P. AND + CRL.A. 1090/2012 & CRL.M.B.1701/2012 MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Vishal Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Kushdeep Gaur & Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocates. versus STATE THR.CBI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.CRL.M.B.Nos.285/2013 & 1633/2012 in CRL.A.1037/2012 & CRL.M.B.1701/2012 in CRL.A.1090/2012 1. The appellants- Baij Nath Mittal and Mukesh Kumar Gupta seek suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. I have heard the counsel for the appellants and learned Spl.P.P. Apparently, allegations against the appellants are very serious whereby they allegedly...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »