Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Bharat Investment Corporation and anr. Vs. Sanjana Saini
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:01.05.2013 RC.REV. 561/2012 & CM No. 19510/2012 M/S BHARAT INVESTMENT CORPORATION AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through Mohd. Ahmed, Adv. versus SANJANA SAINI Through ..... Respondent Mr. Lalit Gupta and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 The impugned order is dated 02.06.2012. The application filed by the tenant seeking leave to defend in pending eviction proceedings under Section 14 (1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRCA) had been dismissed. This is the grievance of the petitioner/tenant before this Court. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner being that a triable issue had in fact arisen but this has not been construed in the correct perspective by the trial Court. Attention has been drawn to the pleadings before the Court. 2 The eviction petition disclosed that it has been filed on the bonafide requirement of the premises for the petitioner/...
Satbir Singh and anr Vs. Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date:1. t May, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 8060/2007 SATBIR SINGH & ANR Through versus ..... Petitioners Mr. Akash Tyagi, Adv. DELHI SIKH GURUDWARA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. Mr. Bhagwant Singh, Ms. Manpreet Kaur and Mr. Mansimran Singh, Advs. with + CONT.CAS(C) 264/2011 SATBIR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through versus AJMER SINGH & ANR Through Mr. Akash Tyagi, Adv. ..... Respondents Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. Mr. Bhagwant singh, Ms. Manpreet Kaur and Mr. Mansimran Singh, Advs. AND + W.P.(C) 4655/2012 T.P.SINGH Through versus ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajkumar Sherawat, Adv. SCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF GHPS , FATEH NAGAR AND ORS .... Respondent Through Ms Vatsala Singh for Ms. Jasmeet Singh, Adv. AND + W.P.(C) 1104/2011 SUSHIL SHARMA Through versus ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajkumar Sherawat, Adv. GHPS INDIA GATE AND ORS Through .... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes VALMIK...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ram Avtar Yadav and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC.A. 36/2012 Judgment reserved on:10. h April, 2013 Judgment delivered on:1. t May, 2013 % BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Brar, Adv. versus RAM AVTAR YADAV & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rupender Singh, Adv. for Mr. J.N. Singh, Adv. for R1 to R4. Mr. Rohit, Adv. for R5 and R6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 17.11.2011 passed by the ld. Tribunal, whereby the appellant was directed to deposit Rs.50,000/- under Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act,1988 as an interim award.2. Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has mainly drawn the attention of this Court to the policy schedule which is at Page 21, annexed as Annexure-A which reads as under: Product: Contractors Plant and Machinery. MANUFACTURER: L&T KOMATSU, TYPEHYDRAULIC EXCAVATOR PC-2006, SR. NO: NL138838, YOM-48168002007 Scope of Cover: As per ...
Indian Railway Finance Corp. Ltd. Vs. Yatender Kumar Sharma and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:01. 05.2013 W.P.(C.) No.3701/2011 INDIAN RAILWAY FINANCE CORP. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Sunil K. Jain, Advocate. versus YATENDER KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Gautam Awasthi and Mr. Ayush Chaudhary, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. I have today disposed of a similar writ petition being W.P.(C.) No.3702/2011 titled Indian Railway Finance Corporation Ltd. v. Rajendra Prasad & Ors. The award in question in the present case dated 15.10.2010 has been passed by the same tribunal in respect of the respondent. The factual position is more or less identical except that in the case of the respondent herein, his services were engaged through M/s. Hingorani M & Co., who were retainer of accounts appointed by the petitioner corporation.2. In the case of Rajendra Prasad, he was similarly engaged on a...
Amballur Joseph James Vs. State of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1720/2013 AMBALLUR JOSEPH JAMES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Pradeep Narula and Ms. Poonam Solanki, Advocates versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for State with SI Satish Kumar, PS New Friends Colony, New Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR % ORDER 01 05.2013 Crl.M.A. No. 5364/2013 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. Crl. M.C. No. 1720/2013 & Crl. M.A. No. 5363/2013 By this petition filed under Section 482 of Cr. P.C., petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 23rd January 2013 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, (Mahila Court), Saket, New Delhi thereby dismissing the objections raised by the petitioner to challenge the territorial jurisdiction of the said court to try the offences punishable under Section 31 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the D.V. Act...
Shri A.K.Srivastava Vs. Min. of Finance and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) No. 4023/1993 May 01, 2013 SHRI A.K.SRIVASTAVA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. G.D.Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate. VERSUS MIN. OF FINANCE AND ORS. Through: ...... Respondents None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is filed by Mr. A.K.Srivastava who was appointed as a Consultant (Electronics) by the Haryana Delhi Industrial Consultant Limited (for short HARDICON) challenging the order of his termination of service dated 14.6.1993. By the order dated 14.6.1993, the petitioner was informed that his services on probation were terminated with immediate effect.2. The facts of the case as per the writ petition are that the petitioner was appointed as a Consultant (Electronics) in HARDICON in terms of the appointment letter dated 16.11.1990. Petitioner states in para 1 of the writ petition that the petitioner was placed on prob...
M/S Majestic Software Ltd. Vs. S.C. Chopra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
$~R4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA 12/2008 + Decided on 1st May, 2013 M/S MAJESTIC SOFTWARE LTD. Through None. ..... Appellant versus S.C. CHOPRA Through ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant, Majestic Software Ltd., Mumbai, is aggrieved of a judgment dated 13th September, 2007, whereby the suit instituted by respondent, Sh. S.C. Chopra, was decreed for mesne profits @ Rs.31,200/per month from 1st February, 2001 to 30th March, 2003 against the appellant, who was arrayed as the first defendant in the court below. The amount decreed was subject to adjustment of any amounts that may already have been received by the decree holder/respondent. The costs were also awarded in favour of the respondent and against the appellant.2. The respondent/plaintiff owned two front flats on the second floor of property bearing not E-584, Greater Kailash, Part-II, New Delhi-110048, that is the suit premises. ...
Nanak Chand Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. 94/2000 Date of Decision:1. t May, 2013 + # NANAK CHAND ! ..... Appellant Through: Mr. K.B. Andley, Senior Adv. with Mr. M.S. Shamikh, Advocate versus $ * STATE ..... Respondent Through: M.N. Dudeja, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN JUDGMENT P.K.BHASIN, J: The appellant in this appeal has prayed for setting aside the judgment dated 20th January, 2000 by which the learned Special Judge, Delhi had held him guilty under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988( hereinafter to be referred as 'the Act of 1988') as also the order dated 24th January, 2000 by which he was awarded rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months under Section 7 and for a period of one year under Section 13(1)(d) in addition to fine on both counts.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case leading to the trial and conviction of the accused appellant are like this. Complaint (Ex. PW-5/A) was made to the anti corruption branch on 18...
Attar Singh Vs. Har Bhagwan and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:01.05.2013 CM(M) 303/2008 ATTAR SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Prakash Srivastava, Adv. versus HAR BHAGWAN & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr.Puneet Relan, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) CM (M) No. 303/2008 & CM No. 3482/2008 (delay in refilling) 1 The petitioner is aggrieved by the finding returned by the Rent Control Tribunal (RCT) dated 03.04.2007 vide which in an appeal against the order passed by the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 06.04.2004; the RCT had granted certain adjustments to the respondents/tenants. 2 Along with this petition, an application seeking condonation of delay of 203 days in refilling the present petition has been filed. The averments made in this application have been perused. It is only a one paragraph application which has stated that the petitioner got delayed in clearing the petition because of illness of the counsel who was sufferi...
Raj Kumar Vs. Union of India Through General Manager Northern Railway ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J) The brief facts, as submitted by the applicant, are that he was originally appointed as an Assistant Station Master (ASM) on 14.11.1999 in Western Central Railway, Jabalpur Division. He got himself transferred from Western Railway to Ambala Division of Northern Railway on mutual exchange basis with one Shri Devinder Kumar, who was working in Ambala Division of Northern Railway. Both of them are belonging to Scheduled Caste Community and the said Devinder Kumar was junior to the applicant. The applicant resumed his duty in Ambala Division on 30.12.2004. 2. It is submitted that, in accordance with rules, when a mutual exchange transfer was allowed, the senior of the two is to be given the position of seniority vacated by the other person, while a junior will be allowed to retain as former seniority and shall be fitted in the seniority list below the persons having the same seniority. Since the applicant was senior to the said Shri Devinder Kumar, he was al...
- ‹ Prev
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 82
- Next ›
- Last »