Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ms.Shaloo Batra and ors. Vs. High Court of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 01-02, 2013 + W.P.(C) 332/2013 MS. SHALOO BATRA AND ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr.Advocate with Mr.K.Venkatraman and Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocates versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajeev Bansal, Advocate with Mr.Devvrat Singh Raghav and Ms.Swati Verma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) 1. In exercise of the power conferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the Delhi High Court Establishment (Appointment & Conditions of Service) Rules 1972 have been framed. As per Rule 4 thereof the Establishment of the Delhi High Court consists of posts listed in Schedule I to the Rules, as amended from time to time. As per the Schedule, inter-alia, 79 posts of Private Secretaries have been sanctioned.2. Being a Group A post, the post of a Private Secretary is a Selection post, requir...
Shabnam @ Mukri @ Abdul Qayum Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h April, 2013 Date of Decision:1. t May, 2013 % + CRL. A.251/1996 SHABNAM @ MUKRI @ ABDUL QAYUM ..... Appellant Through: Mr K B Andley, Sr. Adv. with Mr M. Shamikh, Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr H J S Ahluwalia, Spl. P.P. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.: This is an appeal filed by the accused Shabnam alias Mukri alias Abdul Qayum against the judgment dated 19.10.1996 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in SC No.23/95 in FIR No.426/84, PS Kalyanpuri, holding the appellant guilty of the offences under Section 148, 397 and 436 of the IPC. The appellant was sentenced to undergo RI for three years under section 148 IPC with fine of `3,000/- and in default to undergo RI for six months; to undergo RI for 10 years and fine of `25,000/and in default to undergo RI for two years, under section 397 IPC; and sentenced to RI for a period of 10 years and fine of `25,000/...
Suraj Prakash and ors. Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:01. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 7213/2003 SURAJ PRAKASH AND ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Shri Pradeep, Advocate for the petitioner alongwith Mr. Surender Kumar Malik, son of the petitioner. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through Shri Ajay Verma, Advocate for the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) The petitioners before this Court were occupying shops in Outram Line of Kingsway Camp. A scheme was prepared for redevelopment of Kingsway Camp area known as Kingsway Camp Rehabilitation Scheme. Besides, 233 shops on the main road there were 27 other shops in the area, 11 in Hudson Line, Kingsway Camp and 16 in Outram Line, Kingsway Camp. Initially, the redevelopment scheme was prepared by L&DO and later on it was transferred first to MCD and then to DDA.2. While implementation of the aforesaid scheme to shops No.7 to 16 situated in Outram Line, which were on L&DO land were taken...
Indian Railway Finance Corp. Ltd. Vs. Rajendra Prasad and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:01. 05.2013 % W.P.(C.) No.3702/2011 INDIAN RAILWAY FINANCE CORP. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Sunil K. Jain, Advocate. versus RAJENDRA PRASAD & OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Mr. Gautam Awasthi and Mr. Ayush Chaudhary, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner Indian Railway Finance Corporation Ltd. (IRFC or Corporation for short) has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the industrial Award dated 27.10.2010 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1, Karkardooma Courts Complex, Delhi, (for short, CGIT) in I.D. No. 1/2009. By the impugned Award, the CGIT has upheld the claim of the respondent/workman Shri Rajinder Prasad. The CGIT has awarded the relief of regularization in service, besides reinstatement in service with continuity, and...
Babu Lal Vs. Guru Harikrishan Public School and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +W.P.C Nos.4661/2012, 13566/2009& CONT.CAS(C) Nos. 956/2009,607/2012 % 1st May, 2013 BABU LAL ..... Petitioner Through Md.Ehraz Zafar, Adv. versus GURU HARIKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ANR Through AND + W.P.(C) 13566/2009 BABU LAL Through ..... Respondents Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Bhagwant Singh, Ms. Manpreet Kaur and Mr. Mansimran Singh, Adv. for R1 & 2. Ms. Shawna Bari for Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Adv. for R-2. ..... Petitioner Md. Ehraz Zafar, Adv. versus DELHI SIKH GURUDWARA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Bhagwant Singh, Ms. Manpreet Kaur and Mr. Mansimran Singh, Adv. for R1 & 2. Mr.Sidharth Yadav, Adv. for R-3. with + CONT. CAS (C) 956/2009 BABU LAL Through ..... Petitioner Md. Ehraz Zafar, Adv. versus S. KARTAR SINGH KOCCHAR AND ANR ..... Respondents W.P.C.4661/2012, 13566/2009 & CONT.CAS(C) Nos. 956/2009 & 607/2012 Page 1 Through Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. B...
Phulkaria Minz and ors. Vs. Bina Kambo and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:1. t May, 2013 + MAC.APP. 883/2010 PHULKARIA MINZ & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Satish Tamta and Mr. Rajesh Saxena, Advs. Versus BINA KAMBO & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Adv. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment of the ld. Tribunal dated 19.07.2010 whereby, the claim petition filed by the appellant was dismissed.2. In the instant case accident in question took place on 02.05.1999 and the claim petition under Section 166/140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed on 31.08.2001.3. It is pertinent to mention here that the said claim petition was dismissed in default on 22.11.2003 and was restored thereafter.4. I note, ld. Tribunal framed issues as under:1. Whether injured Smt. Irmina had received injuries in motor vehicle accident due to rash and negligent driving of vehicle no. DDC-7600 by R1, owned...
C.D Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: May 01, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2680/2012 C.D.SHARMA ..... Petitioner Represented by:Ms.Jyoti Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr.A.K.Trivedi, Mr.Tinu Bajwa and Ms.Sahilla Lamba, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.R.L.Dhawan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) 1. The challenge in the writ petition is to the order dated February 18, 2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench in OA No.242/2010, whereby the OA filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the Tribunal. The brief facts are, that the petitioner while working as AEN with the respondents was charge-sheeted on October 29, 1997. charges were framed as under:Article 1 He knowingly and intentionally has got recorded the false measurements of supply of ballast by Shri S.C.Saxena, CPWI(S) in Measurement Book not AGC/347 against 14th on account ...
Harjinder Singh Bhatia Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: May 01, 2013 + W.P.(C) 3360/2012 HARJINDER SINGH BHATIA ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.K.P.Gupta, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Varun Gupta, Advocate with Mr.Sonia Arora, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Nishant Pandey, Advocate for Delhi Jal Board. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner was served with a charge memo dated September 02, 2005. An Inquiry Officer was appointed who submitted a report exonerating the petitioner and agreeing therewith the disciplinary authority passed a final order absolving petitioner of the charge against him vide order dated December 01, 2011. In the interregnum the petitioner superannuated from service on September 30, 2007. Exercising power under Rule 69(1)(c) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, since petitioner had a pensionable service, gratuity was withheld t...
F. Hoffmann- La Rochee Ltd and anr. Vs. Cipla Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: May 01, 2013 + CM No.6436/2013 in RFA(OS) 92/2012 F. HOFFMANN- LA ROCHEE LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Chetan Sharma, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr.Shrawan Chopra, Ms.Prachi Agarwal, Advocates. versus CIPLA LTD. Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Advocate with Ms.Anusuya Mehrotra, Ms.Ujjwala Jeremiah, Advocates. Mr. Anand Grover, Sr.Advocate instructed by with Ms.Neharika, Ms.Manika Arora, Mr.Mihir Samson, Ms.Suhrita Majumdar, Mr.Dominie Alvaves, Advocates for applicant in CM No.6436/2013. CM No.6433/2013 in RFA(OS) 103/2012 CIPLA LTD Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Advocate with Ms.Anusuya Mehrotra, Ms.Ujjwala Jeremiah, Advocates. versus F HOFFMAN LA ROCHEE LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr.Shrawan Chopra, Ms.Prachi Agarwal and Ms.Nayantara Sanyal, Advocates. CM No.6436/2013 in RFA (OS) 92/2012 M...
Laxmi Tiwari and ors. Vs. Arjun Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:01.05.2013 + RC.REV. 167/2013 LAXMI TIWARI & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through Mr.T.C. Yogi and Ms. Deepa Sharma, Adv. versus ARJUN SINGH .... Respondent Through Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) CM No. 6927/2013 (Exemption) 1 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. RC.REV. 167/2013 2 The petitioners before this Court are the landlords. They are aggrieved by the fact that the leave to defend has been granted in favour of the tenant. 3 Record shows that the petitioners have filed this eviction petition under Section 14 (1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRCA). The premises in dispute have been described as shop on the ground floor forming a part of property bearing No. 3/83, four storey, DDA flats, Garhi, New Delhi. 4 The application seeking leave to defend was filed. The triable issue sought to be raised by the respondent was that the ground floor of the property comprise...
- ‹ Prev
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 81
- 82
- Next ›
- Last »