Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Association of Unified Telecom Servic ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. 04.2013. Decided on :31. 05.2013 LPA 200/2013 and CM 5410/2013 ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICES and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Ramji Srinivasan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Umang Gupta, Mr.Faraz Maqbool, Ms.Kabita Das, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED and ORS... Respondents Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Mr.Siddharth Tyagi, Mr.Amit Singh, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Ms.Sweta Gupta, Advs. for BSNL/R-1. Mrs.Sangeeta Singh, Adv. with Mr.Kumar Rajan Mishra, Advs. for TRAI/R-3 + LPA 201/2013 and CM Nos. 5418/2013 & 6578/2013 CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr.Manjul Bajpai, Mr.Sarvajeet Kumar Thakur, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED .....Respondent Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr. Abhishek Kuma...
Hrd Corporation Vs. Gail(India) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 178/2013 and I.A.No.3669/2013 Date of decision :31. t MAY, 2013 % HRD CORPORATION Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shailendra Swarup, Ms. Bindu Saxena, Mr. K.K. Patra, Ms. Aparajita Swarup and Ms. Neha Khattar, Advs. versus GAIL(INDIA) LTD Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tejan Karnia, Mr. Nitesh Jain, Mr. Surendu Das and Mr. Shakti, Advs. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT O.M.P. 178/2013 and I.A.No.3669/2013 1. The petitioner is seeking interim injunction for restraining the respondent from selling the wax produced at its new plant namely HDPE/LLDPE Plant at its Petro Chemical Complex at Pata, U.P. to any third party. The petitioner is also seeking a direction to the respondent to supply the entire quantity of wax produced at its aforesaid plant to the petitioner according to the terms of the agreement dated 1st April, 1999.2. Vide ex-parte order dated 25th Febr...
Cellular Operators Association of India and ors. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Ni ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. 04.2013. Decided on :31. 05.2013 LPA 200/2013 and CM 5410/2013 ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICES and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Ramji Srinivasan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Umang Gupta, Mr.Faraz Maqbool, Ms.Kabita Das, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED and ORS... Respondents Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Mr.Siddharth Tyagi, Mr.Amit Singh, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Ms.Sweta Gupta, Advs. for BSNL/R-1. Mrs.Sangeeta Singh, Adv. with Mr.Kumar Rajan Mishra, Advs. for TRAI/R-3 + LPA 201/2013 and CM Nos. 5418/2013 & 6578/2013 CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr.Manjul Bajpai, Mr.Sarvajeet Kumar Thakur, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED .....Respondent Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr. Abhishek Kuma...
Lt. Cdr. (Retd.) Daryao Singh Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h APRIL, 2013 DECIDED ON :31. t MAY, 2013 + BAIL APPLICATION No.871/2012 LT. CDR. (RETD.) DARYAO SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Nisit Kush, Advocate with Mr.S.K.Sharma, Advocate. versus CBI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Manoj Ohri, Spl.P.P. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The petitioner- Daryao Singh seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in RC No.217, 2012/002/CBI/ACU-VI/New Delhi. The FIR was registered on the basis of source information against four persons and the petitioner is one of them.2. Allegations against the petitioner in the FIR are that in response to a public notice published in May, 1995 for development of farmhouse, the petitioner had submitted proposal. The said proposal did not materialise and the petitioner gave two more proposals. Thereafter, another proposal submitted by the petitioner was accepted. Letter of intent was issued on 22.11.1996. The price of land offered by t...
Dinanath Batra and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t May, 2013 % + W.P.(C) No.651/2012 DINANATH BATRA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. B.S. Shukla, Ms. Monika Arora, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ... Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Ms. Aditi Gupta, Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advs. for UPSC. CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation, impugns the letter No.13018/4/2008-AISI dated 15.10.2010 of the Government of India, Department of Personnel & Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions to the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) communicating the approval to the changes in the Preliminary Examination of the Civil Services Examination, from the year 2011 onwards. Though the changes effected by the said letter are manifold, the challenge is only to inclusion i...
Satish Kumar and anr. Vs. Prakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + F.A.O. No.162/2007 Decided on :31. t May, 2013 SATISH KUMAR & ANR. Through: Appellants Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Advocate. Versus PRAKASH Through: Respondent Mr. B.L.Madhukar, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This order shall dispose of FAO No.162/2007 titled Satish Kumar & Anr. Vs. Prakash.2. Vide order dated 21.2.2007, the learned ADJ, Delhi dismissed the application u/O 3.Rule 1 and 2 CPC of the appellants/plaintiffs.3. Briefly stated the facts leading to the filing of the present appeal are that the appellant filed a suit for specific performance with consequential relief for permanent injunction against the respondent. It was alleged that in the month of May, 2005, the respondent had approached the appellants to sell their agricultural land bearing Khata No.25/21, Khasra No.16/26 (0-3), (1/2 share) and Khata No.24/10, in Khasra No.16/12/2 (1-6) total area measuring 3 bighas 15 biswas and 10 biswansi situated in the revenue est...
Mohd. Yusuf Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. h May, 2013 Date of Decision:31. t May, 2013 % + CRL.A. 196/2001 MOHD. YUSUF ..... Appellant Through Mr Harendra Singh, Adv.(amicus curiae) versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms Jasbir Kaur, APP with SI Hukam Singh, PS Seema Puri CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.: This is an appeal under section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated 19.12.2000 passed by the trial court convicting the appellant Mohd. Yusuf, S/o Mahmood Khan R/o 418, Juggi, New Seemapuri, Delhi under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and the sentence dated 20.12.2000 awarding RI of 7 years and fine of `4,000/- and in default to undergo further RI of one year, with benefit under Section 428 of the Cr.P.C.2. The appeal arises this way. On the night of 11.8.1999 one Mohd. Aziz was returning home and near the police booth of New Seemapuri met his friend Muzammil. Both of them decided to have a cup of tea and went to the khoka in ...
Kumar Nikhil @ Saroj Kumar Shukla @ Jhunnu Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. h May, 2013 Date of Decision:31. t May, 2013 % + BAIL APPLN. 704/2013 KUMAR NIKHIL @ SAROJ KUMAR SHUKLA @ JHUNNU ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP along with SI Hasrat Ali, CAW Cell, PS New Ashok Nagar. Complainant in person with her counsel. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.351/2012 at P.S. New Ashok Nagar under sections 498A/ 406/ 34 of the IPC.2. The bail application arises in the following circumstances. The complainant Neelam, daughter of Radha Krishan Mishra, was married to the applicant, who is an advocate by profession on 18.05.2005 in Bihar. Approximately a sum of `7,00,000/- is stated to have been spent on the marriage, in addition to a sum of `3,00,000/- said to have been given to the applicant to start life; ...
Commissioner of Income-tax Delhi-xv, New Delhi Vs. Smt. Neenu Dutta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 + ITA 279/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX DELHI-XV, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant versus SMT. NEENU DUTTA . Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant :Mr Kiran Babu For the Respondent :Mr Salil Aggarwal with Mr Ravi Pratap Mall CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J.1. This is an appeal filed on behalf of the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). The appellant herein has challenged the order dated 20.07.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 215/Del/2012 for the assessment year 2008-09. The controversy in the present case relates to levy of penalty by the Assessing Officer under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act.2. The assessee filed a return under the Act for the assessment year 2008-09 on 30.09.2008 declaring an income of ` 78,83,303/-. The assessee did not incl...
Rakhi Mandal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.235/2013 % Reserved on: Date of Decision: RAKHI MANDAL Through:7. h May31. t May, 2013 ..... Appellant Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.: The appellant-Rakhi Mandal has assailed her conviction vide judgment dated 24th May, 2012 in Sessions Case No. 1/2012 arising out of FIR No. 519/2007, Police Station Sangam Vihar. The appellant has been convicted under Section 302 and 381 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short). By order on sentence dated 31 st May, 2012, Rakhi Mandal has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment, fine of Rs.15,000/- for the offence under Section 302 IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for three years, and fine of Rs.5,000/- under Section 381 IPC. In default of payment of fine of Rs.15,000/- and Rs.5,000/- as noted above, the appellant is to undergo ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »