Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakhi Mandal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.235/2013 % Reserved on: Date of Decision: RAKHI MANDAL Through:7. h May31. t May, 2013 ..... Appellant Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.: The appellant-Rakhi Mandal has assailed her conviction vide judgment dated 24th May, 2012 in Sessions Case No. 1/2012 arising out of FIR No. 519/2007, Police Station Sangam Vihar. The appellant has been convicted under Section 302 and 381 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short). By order on sentence dated 31 st May, 2012, Rakhi Mandal has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment, fine of Rs.15,000/- for the offence under Section 302 IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for three years, and fine of Rs.5,000/- under Section 381 IPC. In default of payment of fine of Rs.15,000/- and Rs.5,000/- as noted above, the appellant is to undergo ...
Delhi Jal Board and ors. Vs. M/S Khub Chand Tyagi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :9. h May, 2013 Judgment pronounced on:31. t May, 2013 % + OMP No.887/2012 DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.L.K. Singh, Adv. versus M/S KHUB CHAND TYAGI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Vivekanand, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the Award dated 14 th May, 2012 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator appointed by learned Additional District Judge in Suit No.469/2004, whereby the learned Arbitrator has allowed all the claims of the respondent.2. Claim Nos.1 and 4 had been admitted by the petitioner before the learned Arbitrator and thus the Award of claim Nos.2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 has been challenged by the petitioner.3. The brief facts are : i) The petitioner herein (erstwhile Delhi Water Supply and Sewage Disposal undertaking now reconstituted and taken ove...
Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 ITR 49-50/1996 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + .. Respondent ITA 151/2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + ..... Respondent ITA 302/2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + ..... Respondent ITA 480/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr N.P. Sahni. For the Respondent : Mr O.P. Dua, Sr. Adv. with Ms Babita CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.These are three appeals and a reference which involve similar issues and thus have been taken up together. ITR Nos. 49-50/1996 are cross references, one made by the assessee and the other preferred on behalf of the revenue again...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. M/S. Anand Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order Reserved on:13. h May, 2013 Order Pronounced on:31. t May, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.3023/2012 & I.A.No.20669/2012 BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.R.V.Sinha, Adv. with Ms.Sangeeta Rai, Adv. versus M/S ANAND BROTHERS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.Gurmehar S.Sistani, Adv. for D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff/objector, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. has filed the objections under Sections 30 & 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for settingaside the Award dated 25th June, 2010 passed by the sole Arbitrator.2. Brief facts are that the agreement No.45/DO/(E)-II/1989-90 for carrying out the work called P/I Automatic Wet Riser Fire Fighting System at T.E. Building, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi was executed by and on behalf of the Union of India and defendant No.1. Consequent upon the formation of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. w.e.f. 1st October, 2000 in terms of the policy decision of the C...
Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Pradeep Kumar Khanna an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. Nos. 20563/2012, 608/2013, 2049/2013 & 4433/2013 in CS(OS) 3195/2012 + Date of Decision:31. t May, 2013 # VIDUR IMPEX & TRADERS PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sunil Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manoj, Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain & Mr. M.T. Reddy, Advocates VERSUS $ * PRADEEP KUMAR KHANNA & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Mr. Yakesh Anand, Ms. Kajal Chandra, Ms. Sonam Anand, Mr. Nimit Mathur & Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocates for D-1(i-iii) Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, & Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Advocates with Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Ms. Ruchi Jain & Mr. Deepak Bashta, Advocates for D-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN P.K.BHASIN, J: Six plaintiffs in this suit are private limited Companies and they claim to have purchased property no. 21, Aurangzeb Road, New Delhi(hereinafter to be referred to as the suit property) from its erstwhile owner late Shri Pradeep Kumar Khanna(who is being represented in this suit by his widow an...
Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 ITA 1732/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ....Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN .Respondent ITA 1733/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN ..... Respondent ITA 1734/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN ..... Respondent ITA 451/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent ITA 779/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr N.P. Sahni. For the Respondent : Mr O.P. Dua, Sr. Adv. with Ms Babita CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.These are appeals which have been preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter refer...
Cellular Operators Association of India and ors. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Ni ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. 04.2013. Decided on :31. 05.2013 LPA 200/2013 and CM 5410/2013 ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICES and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Ramji Srinivasan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Umang Gupta, Mr.Faraz Maqbool, Ms.Kabita Das, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED and ORS... Respondents Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Mr.Siddharth Tyagi, Mr.Amit Singh, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Ms.Sweta Gupta, Advs. for BSNL/R-1. Mrs.Sangeeta Singh, Adv. with Mr.Kumar Rajan Mishra, Advs. for TRAI/R-3 + LPA 201/2013 and CM Nos. 5418/2013 & 6578/2013 CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr.Manjul Bajpai, Mr.Sarvajeet Kumar Thakur, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED .....Respondent Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr. Abhishek Kuma...
Mukesh @ Jurra Vs. the State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :31. t MAY, 2013 + CRL.A.1407/2011 & CRL.M.B.1978/2011 MUKESH @ JURRA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Rajender Yadav, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. SI A.Singh, PS Mahindra Park. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Mukesh @ Jurra challenges judgment dated 01.08.2011 in Sessions Case No.1210/2010 arising out of FIR No.88/2009 under Sections 307/394/397/34 IPC PS Mahindra Park by which he and Karan @ Palak and Deepak were convicted for committing offence punishable under Section 394 read with Section 397 IPC. Vide order dated 12.08.2011, the appellant was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine ` 25,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 14.12.2009 at about 08.00 P.M. at Service Road near GTK Depot he, Karan @ Palak and Deepak in furtherance of common intention, voluntarily caused hurt to Sanjay and rob...
P.L. Kalra Vs. Braham Dutt Saini
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :23. d April, 2013 Judgment delivered on:31. t May, 2013 % + Arb.P.No.103/2012 P.L. KALRA .....Petitioner Through Mr. Neeraj Jain, Adv. versus BRAHAM DUTT SAINI Through .....Respondent Mr. Shalabh Gupta,Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The abovementioned petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 11of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of Arbitrator (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. Brief facts as mentioned in the petition are that the petitioner is the owner of the property bearing not Z-45/2, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-II, New Delhi. By agreement dated 1st July, 1999, the petitioner let out the covered space measuring 2330 Sq.ft. out of the total covered area of the said property to the respondent for the purposes of running his factory for dyeing and packaging. The respondent was to pay a sum of `9,000/- per month along with the increase of 10%...
Mukesh Kumar Gupta Vs. State Thr.Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :13. h MAY, 2013 DECIDED ON :31. t MAY, 2013 + CRL.A. 1037/2012 & CRL.M.B.Nos.285/2013 & 1633/2012 BAIJ NATH MITTAL Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Rebecca M.John, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kushdeep Gaur & Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocates. versus STATE THR.C.B.I. Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P. AND + CRL.A. 1090/2012 & CRL.M.B.1701/2012 MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Vishal Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Kushdeep Gaur & Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocates. versus STATE THR.CBI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.CRL.M.B.Nos.285/2013 & 1633/2012 in CRL.A.1037/2012 & CRL.M.B.1701/2012 in CRL.A.1090/2012 1. The appellants- Baij Nath Mittal and Mukesh Kumar Gupta seek suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. I have heard the counsel for the appellants and learned Spl.P.P. Apparently, allegations against the appellants are very serious whereby they allegedly...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »