Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S thermo Blow Engineers Vs. Dda and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :29. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :31. 05.2013 W.P(C) No.669/2013 M/S THERMO BLOW ENGINEERS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sidharth Joshi and Mr. Ankur, Advocates versus DDA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The petitioner before this Court Shri Vijay Kumar Grover is carrying business under the name and style of `M/s Thermo Blow Engineers and is engaged in manufacturing and supply of various sports and fitness equipments. The respondent/DDA invited quotations for supply of belts and decks for Johnsons make Treadmill, to be supplied within 15 days of the order. The quotation of the petitioner having been accepted, an order was placed with him for supply of the aforesaid articles. After some days of the supply, the respondent complained that jerk was felt during workout of treadmill and there were chances of the user getting injured during the ...
Devender Singh @ Roxy Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h May, 2013 Date of Decision:31. t May, 2013 % + BAIL APPLN. 668/2013 DEVENDER SINGH @ ROXY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. O.N. Sharma and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP along with SI Rajesh Kumar Singh, P.S. Naraina. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. by Devender Singh @ Roxy in case FIR No.72/2013 registered in P.S. Naraina under section 379/ 411/ 201/ 34 of the IPC.2. According to the prosecution, an FIR was registered at the instance of one Ravinder Singh who complained that his Maruti Van bearing not DL-2CAF-4520 which was parked under the Naraina flyover was stolen. Based on the FIR, the police arrested a person by name Makdoom on 22.03.2013 from Mayapuri. Two other persons by name Narender Singh and Mahinder Singh, who were the brothers of the a...
Schenker India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Searir Transport System
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: May 31, 2013 + Arb.P.No.95/2013 SCHENKER INDIA PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ashutosh Dubey, Adv. with Mr.Abhishek Chauhan, Adv. versus SEARIR TRANSPORT SYSTEM ..... Respondent Through Mr.Rakesh K.Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for appointment of sole Arbitrator. The facts as per the petition read as under:(i) The petitioner and the respondent entered into a Cargo Sales Agency Agreement dated 1 st February, 1999 for facilitating business transactions, pertaining to ocean import, ocean export and air import shipments, wherein the respondent Company was to be acting for the petitioner in the State of Punjab. (ii) The agreement was terminated by mutual consensus vide e-mail dated 12th May, 2011, thereby stating the date of term...
Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 ITA 1732/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ....Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN .Respondent ITA 1733/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN ..... Respondent ITA 1734/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN ..... Respondent ITA 451/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent ITA 779/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr N.P. Sahni. For the Respondent : Mr O.P. Dua, Sr. Adv. with Ms Babita CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.These are appeals which have been preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter refer...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. M/S. Anand Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order Reserved on:13. h May, 2013 Order Pronounced on:31. t May, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.3022/2012 & I.A.No.20671/2012 BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.R.V.Sinha, Adv. with Ms.Sangeeta Rai, Adv. versus M/S ANAND BROTHERS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.Gurmehar S.Sistani, Adv. for D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff/objector, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. has filed the objections under Sections 30 & 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for settingaside the Award dated 25th June, 2010 passed by the sole Arbitrator.2. Brief facts are that the agreement No.47/EE/(E)-II/1986-87 for carrying out the work called P/I Automatic Wet Riser Fire Fighting System in Admn. Building, Rajauri Garden, New Delhi was executed by and on behalf of the Union of India and defendant No.1. Consequent upon the formation of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. w.e.f. 1st October, 2000 in terms of the policy decision of th...
Hillcrest Realty Sdn Bhd Vs. Hotel Queen Road Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.A. (SB) 4 of 2006 Reserved on: April 30, 2013 Decision on: May 31, 2013 HILLCREST REALTY SDN BHD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Advocate. versus HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harsh Sharma, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Mr. Jayant K. Mehta and Ms. Pragya Singh, Advocates for Mr. Ashok Mittal. Ms. Tanu Priya Gupta, Advocate for South Indian Bank. Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atul Sharma and Mr. Nitesh Jain, Advocates for R.P. Mittal Group. Mr. V. Kanagaraj, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gautam Dhamija, Advocate for Respondent No.3 Ms. Nidhi Mehrotra, Advocate for R-6. Mr. Mayank Bansal, Advocate for IOB with Mr. Deepak Sudan, AGM and Mr. Vivek Dixit, Senior Manager. WITH CO.A (SB) 5 of 2006 HOTEL QUEEN ROAD PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Harsh Sharma, Advocate for Appellant No.1. Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Mr. Jayant K. Mehta and Ms....
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Association of Unified Telecom Servic ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. 04.2013. Decided on :31. 05.2013 LPA 200/2013 and CM 5410/2013 ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICES and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Ramji Srinivasan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Umang Gupta, Mr.Faraz Maqbool, Ms.Kabita Das, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED and ORS... Respondents Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Mr.Siddharth Tyagi, Mr.Amit Singh, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Ms.Sweta Gupta, Advs. for BSNL/R-1. Mrs.Sangeeta Singh, Adv. with Mr.Kumar Rajan Mishra, Advs. for TRAI/R-3 + LPA 201/2013 and CM Nos. 5418/2013 & 6578/2013 CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr.Manjul Bajpai, Mr.Sarvajeet Kumar Thakur, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED .....Respondent Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr. Abhishek Kuma...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 ITA 1732/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ....Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN .Respondent ITA 1733/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN ..... Respondent ITA 1734/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN ..... Respondent ITA 451/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent ITA 779/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr N.P. Sahni. For the Respondent : Mr O.P. Dua, Sr. Adv. with Ms Babita CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.These are appeals which have been preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter refer...
Delhi and District Cricket Association Vs. Rajnish Aggarwal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + F.A.O. No.146 of 2013 & C.M. No.4806/2013 (for stay) Decided on :31. t May, 2013 DELHI & DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION Appellants Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P.D. Gupta & Ms. Sunita Tiwari, Advocates. Versus RAJNISH AGGARWAL & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. N.N. Aggarwal, Mr. Rohit Gandhi & Mr. Varun Garg, Advocates for R-1 & 2. Mr. V.P. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harikishan, Advocate for R-2 to 7. Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Advocate for R-12. WITH + F.A.O. No.145 of 2013 & C.M. No.4803/2013 (for stay) RAVINDER MANCHANDA & ORS. Appellants Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harikishan, Advocate. Versus RAJNISH AGGARWAL & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. N.N. Aggarwal, Mr. Rohit Gandhi & Mr. Varun Garg, Advocates for R-1 & 2. Ms. Ritika Godhwani, Advocate for R-5. Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Advocate for R-7. Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P.D. Gupta & Ms. Sunita Tiwari, Advocates for R-16. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K...
Rakhi Mandal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.235/2013 % Reserved on: Date of Decision: RAKHI MANDAL Through:7. h May31. t May, 2013 ..... Appellant Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.: The appellant-Rakhi Mandal has assailed her conviction vide judgment dated 24th May, 2012 in Sessions Case No. 1/2012 arising out of FIR No. 519/2007, Police Station Sangam Vihar. The appellant has been convicted under Section 302 and 381 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short). By order on sentence dated 31 st May, 2012, Rakhi Mandal has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment, fine of Rs.15,000/- for the offence under Section 302 IPC and Rigorous Imprisonment for three years, and fine of Rs.5,000/- under Section 381 IPC. In default of payment of fine of Rs.15,000/- and Rs.5,000/- as noted above, the appellant is to undergo ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »