Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Vs. Mangal Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 04.2013 Decided on:22. 05.2013 + In the matter of COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION In Re: Crl.A.193/2006 STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .Appellant Versus SIDHARTHA VASHISHT @ MANU SHARMA & ORS. ..Respondents + CRL.M.A.1898/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHYAN MUNSHI ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1899/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHIVDAS YADAV ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1900/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus ANDLEEP SEHGAL ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1901/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus MANOJ KUMAR ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1902/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus BALBIR SINGH ..Respondent CRL.M.A.1899/2007 and connected Crl.M.A.s in CRL.A.193/06 Page 1 + CRL.M.A.1904/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus TARSEM LAL THHAPAR ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1906/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHANKAR MUKHIA ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1908/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus CHANDER...
Anoop Madan Vs. Dena Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d May, 2013. + CS(OS) 1659/2010 ANOOP MADAN Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sakal Bhushan, Advocate. Versus DENA BANK Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Sanjeev Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGMENT % 1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.22,50,000/- with past, pendente lite and future interest @ 12% per annum till the date of actual realization.2. It is the case of the plaintiff in the plaint: (i) that the defendant Dena Bank had got published the Sale Notice dated 19th January, 2010 with respect to the secured asset namely B-814 A, RIICO Industrial Area, Phase-II, Bhiwadi, Rajasthan; (ii) that one of the terms of the said Sale Notice inter alia was that statutory and other dues payable and due on the secured asset shall be borne by the buyer; (iii) that the plaintiff submitted his bid dated 20th January, 2010 for Rs.90 lakhs along with an Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) of Rs.9 ...
State Vs. Balbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 04.2013 Decided on:22. 05.2013 + In the matter of COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION In Re: Crl.A.193/2006 STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .Appellant Versus SIDHARTHA VASHISHT @ MANU SHARMA & ORS. ..Respondents + CRL.M.A.1898/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHYAN MUNSHI ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1899/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHIVDAS YADAV ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1900/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus ANDLEEP SEHGAL ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1901/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus MANOJ KUMAR ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1902/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus BALBIR SINGH ..Respondent CRL.M.A.1899/2007 and connected Crl.M.A.s in CRL.A.193/06 Page 1 + CRL.M.A.1904/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus TARSEM LAL THHAPAR ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1906/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHANKAR MUKHIA ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1908/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus CHANDER...
Vishnu Khandelwal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h May, 2013 Pronounced on:22. d May, 2013 + CRL.A. 638/2011 VISHNU KHANDELWAL Through ..... Appellant Mr. Anil Soni, Advocate versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The Appellant impugns a judgment dated 15.03.2011 and an order on sentence of even date passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge(ASJ) in Sessions Case No.84/2008 FIR No.450/2008 registered at Police Station Rohini whereby the Appellant was held guilty for the offences punishable under Sections 328, 376 and 506 IPC. He was sentenced to undergo RI for two years and to pay a fine of `3,000/- or in default to undergo SI for two months for the offence punishable under Section 328 IPC; he was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years and to pay a fine of `5,000/- or in default to undergo SI for three months for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC; he was further sentenced...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi Vs. D.K.Puri and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : May 22 , 2013 + LPA 315/2013 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate with Mr.Vibhav Mishra, Advocate versus D.K.PURI & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Salim Inamdar, Advocate with Mr.Vedanta Varma, Mr.Vibhor Kush and Ms.Kartika Chaudhary, Advocates for R-1 Mr.Parag Tripathi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna and Ms.Meenakshi Midha, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The appeal challenges an interim order dated April 16, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of CM No.4116/2013 filed by the first respondent, the writ petitioner before the learned Single Judge.2. Communication dated March 25, 2013 removing first respondent from the post of trustee held by him has been stayed.3. Our concern in the appeal is limited to see whether the discretion has been exercised by the learned...
Dhiraj Mohali Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on May 20, 2013 Judgment Delivered on May 22, 2013 W.P.(C) 6075/2011 DHIRAJ MOHALI ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by:Mr.Sachin Datta, CGSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated August 25, 2010 passed in OA No.1492/2008 whereby the challenge of the petitioner to the order of the President dated May 28, 2008 by which he has been dismissed from service under sub-clause (c) to second proviso to Article 311 (2) of the Constitution of India has been rejected.2. The brief facts are the petitioner while working as JIO-II/WT of SIB Raipur Chattisgarh was arrested by the local police along with two other persons in March 2008 in connection with a criminal case No.58/2006 under Sections 365/420/395/120-B/34 of IPC registered again...
Rajender Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.324/2013 % Date of decision:22. d May, 2013 RAJENDER SINGH Through ..... Petitioner Major K. Ramesh, Adv. with Ms. Archana Ramesh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Adv. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (ORAL) 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 6th November, 2010 passed by the Deputy Commandant, CISF finding the petitioner guilty of the following charge:No.034470754 Constable (GD) Rajender Singh of SSG, CISF, Greater Noida (U.P.) while deployed at Shri Madhavan Nair outpost Bangalore was detailed for C shift duty from 2100 hrs on 15.9.2010 to 0500 hrs on 16.9.2010 with Arms at the residence of the PP. The said Constable was found sitting on a chair and sleeping on duty at 2358 hrs. on 15.9.2010 when checked by Shri Devender Kumar Insp/exe. The post I/C. This act of CISF No.034470754 ...
State Vs. Ali Mohammad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 04.2013 Decided on:22. 05.2013 + In the matter of COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION In Re: Crl.A.193/2006 STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .Appellant Versus SIDHARTHA VASHISHT @ MANU SHARMA & ORS. ..Respondents + CRL.M.A.1898/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHYAN MUNSHI ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1899/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHIVDAS YADAV ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1900/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus ANDLEEP SEHGAL ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1901/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus MANOJ KUMAR ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1902/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus BALBIR SINGH ..Respondent CRL.M.A.1899/2007 and connected Crl.M.A.s in CRL.A.193/06 Page 1 + CRL.M.A.1904/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus TARSEM LAL THHAPAR ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1906/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHANKAR MUKHIA ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1908/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus CHANDER...
State Vs. Barun Shah
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. 04.2013 Decided on:22. 05.2013 + In the matter of COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION In Re: Crl.A.193/2006 STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .Appellant Versus SIDHARTHA VASHISHT @ MANU SHARMA & ORS. ..Respondents + CRL.M.A.1898/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHYAN MUNSHI ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1899/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHIVDAS YADAV ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1900/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus ANDLEEP SEHGAL ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1901/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus MANOJ KUMAR ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1902/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus BALBIR SINGH ..Respondent CRL.M.A.1899/2007 and connected Crl.M.A.s in CRL.A.193/06 Page 1 + CRL.M.A.1904/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus TARSEM LAL THHAPAR ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1906/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus SHANKAR MUKHIA ..Respondent + CRL.M.A.1908/2007 IN CRL.A.193/2006 STATE Appellant Versus CHANDER...
M/S. Sanghu Chakra Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 05.2013 Decided on:22. 05.2013 + FAO (OS) 72/2009 M/S. SANGHU CHAKRA HOTELS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. ...Appellant Through: Mr. G. Umapathy and Ms. R. Mekhala, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. A. Makwati and Mr. Aditya Malhotra, Advocates, for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellant (hereafter called Sanghu Chakra Hotels) challenges the correctness of the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 08.08.2008 in OMP 374/2006. By the impugned judgment, the application of the Union of India (UOI) [hereafter referred to as the objector or the Union] in respect of an award, was allowed.2. Sanghu Chakra Hotels successfully bid during the disinvestment process, and acquired shares in the Madurai Hotels FAO(OS) 72/2009 Page 1 Private Limited. As part of this transaction, the Share Purchas...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »