Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pritam Singh Saini and anr Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
Om Prakash and anr Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
Paras Nath and ors. Vs. Govt.of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: May 10, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 24, 2013 + WP(C) No.424/2013 DR.BABA SAHIB AMBEDKAR HOSPITAL REPRESENTED BY: ITS MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT AND ORS. .....Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate versus SWASTIKA BHAKAT & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pawan Bahl, Advocate with Ms.Kamlakshi Singh, Advocate WP(C)No.3077/2013 PARAS NATH & ORS. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.Pawan Bahl, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Staff nurses working on contract basis with Dr.Baba Sahib Ambedkar Hospital, established by the Government of NCT Delhi, and appointed on different dates in the months of July and August 2001 filed OA No.1843/2010 raising issues of being discriminat...
Hc Ishwar Singh and Another Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through the Comm ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
Sh. G. George Paracken: Applicant No.1, Shri Ishwar is a Head Constable (HC for short) and the Applicant No.2, Shri Mukesh is a Constable in Delhi Police. Their grievance in this Original Application filed jointly by them is against the Annexure A-1 order dated 02.12.2009 whereby the departmental enquiry proceedings have been initiated against them, Annexure A-4 findings of the Enquiry Officer dated 28.02.2010, Annexure A-2 order of the Disciplinary Authority dated 30.08.2011 whereby punishment of forfeiture of service temporarily for a period of one year entailing reduction in their pay proportionately with immediate effect was imposed upon them and their suspension period was treated as period not spent on duty for all intents and purposes, Annexure A-5 order dated 23.09.2011 whereby the name of the Applicants have been kept in secret list of doubtful integrity for a period of 3 years and the Annexure A-3 order dated 23.03.12 whereby the appeal filed by them have been rejected by the...
Government of Nct of Delhi Vs. Irshad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2013
$~7 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: May 23, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5592/2011 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr.V.K.Tandon and Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates versus IRSHAD ..... Respondent Represented by:Mr.Anil Singal, Advocate W.P.(C) 7820/2011 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr.V.K.Tandon and Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates versus YOGESH KUMAR ..... Respondent Represented by:Mr.Vinay Kr.Sharma, Advocate W.P.(C) 7824/2011 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr.V.K.Tandon and Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates versus ROHTAS SINGH W.P.(C) No.5592/2011 ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 8435/2011 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr.V.K.Tandon and Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates versus SAMINDER KUMAR ..... Respondent Represented by:Mr.Anil Singal, Advocate W.P.(C) 456/2012 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr.V.K.Tandon and Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates versus KULDEEP KUMAR ..... Resp...
Mohd. Imam @ ImamuddIn Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:21. t May, 2013 Date of Decision:23. d May, 2013 % + BAIL APPLN. 734/2013 MOHD. IMAM @ IMAMUDDIN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Joginder Tuli, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP along with SI Ratnesh Kumar Singh, P.S. Nand Nagri. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is an application for regular bail under section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.81/2009 under sections 186/ 353/ 394/ 397/ 307/ 411/ 34 of the IPC registered at P.S. Nand Nagri.2. According to the FIR, on the intervening night of 12.03.2009 and 13.03.2009, Head Constable Onkar Singh of police station Nand Nagri was stated to have been patrolling the area on night duty. While passing through the DDA Market, four or five persons are said to have assaulted him on his face and head with a baseball bat and brick, robbed his service revolver and 5 live cartridges and his other belongings and left hi...
Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Kulwant Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :26. h FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :23. d MAY, 2013 + CRL.A. 470/1997 NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ....Appellant Through : Mr.Satish Aggarwala, Spl.P.P. with Mr.Sushil Kaushik, Advocate. versus KULWANT SINGH Through : .Respondent Mr.Sunil Mehta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present appeal has been preferred by Narcotics Control Bureau against judgment dated 17.05.1997 in Sessions Case No.12/1996 by which the respondents were acquitted. I have heard the learned Spl.P.P. for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent- Kulwant Singh and have examined the record. It reveals that complaint for offences punishable under sections 21 and 29 NDPS Act was filed by Sh.S.K.Vadhera, Intellignce Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau on 10.09.1987 against Mkemaekolam Okorie Ugroyozer, Godfrey Kelochechi Anyonwre, Ajit Singh Bhatia, Kulwant Singh and James W. Litchfield (hereinafter referred as respondents No. 1, 2, ...
Mahavir Singh Tyagi Vs. Food Corporation of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.11750/2006 % May 23, 2013 MAHAVIR SINGH TYAGI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Gulab Chandra, Advocate. VERSUS FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? ...... Respondents Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition, the petitioner prays for issuing of a writ or direction to the respondent No.1/employer/Food Corporation of India to release the gratuity amount of the petitioner alongwith interest.2. It is not disputed that against the petitioner various disciplinary orders have been passed whereby amounts have been directed to be recovered from his retirement benefits. The orders which are passed in this regard by the disciplinary authority are dated 6.1.2005 (four in number) and 28.12.2004 (two in number). Different amounts as penalties have been imposed against the petitioner. Respondent accordingly has taken action for recovery of the...
Suman Singh Vs. Sanjay Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: May 09, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 23, 2013 + FAO 108/2013 SUMAN SINGH Represented by: .....Appellant Ms.Padmini Gupta, Advocate versus SANJAY SINGH Represented by: ..... Respondent Respondent in person FAO 109/2013 SUMAN SINGH Represented by: .....Appellant Ms.Padmini Gupta, Advocate versus SANJAY SINGH Represented by: ..... Respondent Respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On February 26, 1999, respondent Sanjay and appellant Suman got happily married and the two were blessed with a daughter born on June 15, 2002 followed by another bundle of delight, another daughter born on February 10, 2006.2. Unfortunately, relations soured with passage of time. Sanjay sought dissolution of the marriage alleging cruelty and Suman sought restitution of her conjugal rights.3. Both Sanjay and Suman reached the Court on July 19, 2010. It appears ...
Commissioner of Police Vs. Rohtas Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2013
$~7 to 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: May 23, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5592/2011 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr.V.K.Tandon and Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates versus IRSHAD ..... Respondent Represented by:Mr.Anil Singal, Advocate W.P.(C) 7820/2011 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr.V.K.Tandon and Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates versus YOGESH KUMAR ..... Respondent Represented by:Mr.Vinay Kr.Sharma, Advocate W.P.(C) 7824/2011 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr.V.K.Tandon and Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates versus ROHTAS SINGH W.P.(C) No.5592/2011 ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 8435/2011 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr.V.K.Tandon and Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates versus SAMINDER KUMAR ..... Respondent Represented by:Mr.Anil Singal, Advocate W.P.(C) 456/2012 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE ..... Petitioner Represented by:Mr.V.K.Tandon and Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocates versus KULDEEP KUMAR ..... Resp...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »