Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mool Chand and anr Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
Shabab Khan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + (1) CRL. A. No. 535/2010 SHABAB KHAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Banamali Shukla, Advocate. versus STATE Through: + (2) ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CRL. A. No. 536/2010 AFTAB KHAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Banamali Shukla, Advocate. versus STATE Through: + (3) ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. CRL. A. No. 538/2010 NAWAB ANWAR KHAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Banamali Shukla, Advocate. versus STATE Through: % ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. Date of Decision : May 24, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The present appeals arise out of the judgment and order dated 15.3.2010 and 17.3.2010 wherein the learned trial court convicted the Appellants for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentenced them to imprisonment for life.2. The brief facts of the present case are as under: On 28th March, 2004, at 8.01 p.m., an info...
Rakesh Kumar Saini and anr Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
Geeta and ors. Vs. Uoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + F.A.O. No.253 of 2009 Decided on :24. h May, 2013 GEETA & ORS. Through: Appellant Mr. N.K. Guptaa, Advocate. Versus UOI Through: Respondent Mr. Amit Dubey, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the appellants under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal against the judgment dated 9.4.2009 passed by the Chairman, Railway Claims Tribunal dismissing the petition of the appellants bearing not OA (IIU) 79/2008 for grant of compensation.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that one Gurdeep Singh is purported to have died as a result of injuries sustained by him in an untoward railway accident on 7.1.2008 at about 11 a.m. at platform No.3, Sadar Bazar Railway Station. It was alleged that he was involved in this accident on account of being a bona fide passenger in EMU Train not SNP-2. The appellant No.1, Geeta, is the widow, appellant Nos.2 & 3 are the children and appellant No.4 is the mother ...
Kamla Thukral and ors Vs. Tarlok Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:24. 5.2013 RC.REV. 281/2012 & C.M. No.11240/2012(stay) KAMLA THUKRAL & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Dr.N.K.Khetrapal, Adv. versus TARLOK SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr.V.B.Andlay, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Priyank Sharma and Mr.K.C. Baliar Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 Order impugned is the order dated 02.3.2012. The application filed by the tenant/petitioner seeking leave to defend in a pending eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the DRCA) had been dismissed. The petitioner is aggrieved by the aforenoted finding. 2 Record shows that the eviction petition has been filed by the respondent/landlord under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25 B of the DRCA seeking eviction of the tenant from the premises which are occupied by him i.e. one room on the ground floor, entire first floor, a store and bath room on the ...
Basant Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3501/2013 Date of decision:24. h May, 2013 % + BASANT KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. D.N. Goburdhun, Adv. with Mr.Aayush Chandra, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA ORDER % 24.05.2013 GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. Vide this writ petition, the petitioner challenges the action of the respondents in initiation of the disciplinary proceedings against him on the ground that the same is without jurisdiction and illegal.2. To the extent necessary, the facts giving rise to the writ petition are noted hereinafter. The petitioner contends that he was recruited on 5th January, 1989 as Constable in the Cadre of Executive Branch of Central Industrial Security Force (CISF). It is undisputed before us that vide an order dated 9th September, 2008, the petitioner was detailed to work in the Accounts (1) Section 8 of the Ba...
Up State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commis ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:24. 05.2013 % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % W.P.(C) 5648/2010 and C.M. Appln. No. 11103/2010; W.P.(C) 5650/2010 and C.M. Appln. No. 11108/2010; W.P.(C) 6675/2010 and C.M. Appln. No. 13201/2010; W.P.(C) 6676/2010 and C.M. Appln. No. 13202/2010; W.P.(C) 875/2011 and C.M. Appln. No. 1841/2011; W.P.(C) 876/2011 and C.M. Appln. No. 1843/2011; W.P.(C) 877/2011 and C.M. Appln. No. 1845/2011; W.P.(C) 8964/2011 and C.M. Appln. Nos.20217/2011 & 2329/2012; W.P.(C) 8967/2011 and C.M. Appln. Nos.20223/2011 & 2330/2012; W.P.(C) 8968/2011 and C.M. Appln. Nos.20226/2011 & 2536/2012; W.P.(C) 8969/2011 and C.M. Appln. No. 20229/2011 & 2331/2012; W.P.(C) 8971/2011 and C.M. Appln. No. 2328/2012; W.P.(C) 8980/2011 and C.M. Appln. Nos.20240/2011 & 2530/2012; W.P.(C) 2529/2012 and C.M. Appln. Nos.5422/2012 & 6944/2012; W.P.(C) 2538/2012 and C.M. Appln. Nos.5435-37/2012; W.P.(C) 3522/2013 ; W.P.(C) 3538/2013; and W.P.(C) 3540/2013. UP STATE ROAD...
M/S Keventer Agro Limited Vs. M/S Kalyan Vyapar Pvt Ltd and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h May, 2013 % + CS(OS) 2697/2011. M/S KEVENTER AGRO LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms.Pinky Anand, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Attin Shankar Rastogi, Mr. Aayush Chandra & Ms. Natasha Shehrawat, Advs. versus M/S KALYAN VYAPAR PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Dipak Kumar Jena & Mr. Y. Nautial, Advs. for D-1. Mr. Rajat Aneja, Mr. C.M. Kapoor & Mr. Ishaan Chhaya, Advs. for D-2. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J IA.No.17339/2011 & IA.No.20198/2011 (both of the plaintiff u/O 3.Rule 1 & 2 CPC) & IA No.6590/2013 (of the defendant no.2 for interim directions).1. The plaintiff had instituted the present suit, originally against the defendant no.1 only, pleading (i) that the plaintiff and the defendant Company had certain business transactions and pursuant to that, around September / October, 2007 the defendant permitted the plaintiff permissive use and occupation of...
Manorma Singh and anr Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h May, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 1368/2012 MANORMA SINGH AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Rekha Palli, Ms.Punam Singh and Ms.Amrita Prakash, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ashish Nishchal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA For judgment see WP(C)No.8744/2011 dated 24th May, 2013. GITA MITTAL, J J.R. MIDHA, J MAY 24.2013 mk...
Jeet Ram Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on May 06, 2013 Judgment Delivered on May 24, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2649/2010 JEET RAM Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.K Gupta, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Ruchi Sindhwani and Ms.Bandana Shukla, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated July 21, 2009 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in Original Application No.981/2007 and order dated November 04, 2009 in Review Application No.201/2009, whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the Original Application and Review Application filed by the petitioner.2. The brief facts are that the petitioner superannuated as Senior PET under the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi. He filed Original Application No.2099/2002 claimi...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »