Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay Aggarwal and anr Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
Sanjeev Alias Sonu and Birender @ Boya Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DATE OF DECISION:24. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.A. No.897/2010 SANJEEV ALIAS SONU & BIRENDER @ BOYA ... Appellants Through: Ms. Kamna Vohra, Adv. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. + CRL.A. No.900/2010 YAD RAM & BABLOO Through: ... Appellants Ms. Kamna Vohra, Adv. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. + CRL.A. No.487/2012, CRL.M(BAIL) 822/2012 & CRL.M.A.5241/2012 RAJIV ALIAS RAJU Through: ... Appellant Ms. Kamna Vohra, Adv. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Ritu Gauba, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI GITA MITTAL, J Crl.A.897/2010 & 900/2010 1. These three appeals have been filed by the appellants assailing the judgment dated 28th May, 2010 arising out of the same incident whereby Yad Ram and Babloo (Appellants in Cril.App.900/2010) have been found guilty of commission of offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian P...
Dharambir Singh Saini and anr Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
Ramesh Thakur Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:27. h February, 2013 Judgment delivered on:24. h May, 2013 CRL.M.C. 2019/2011 RAMESH THAKUR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey, Mr. Manoj Taneja and Ms. Zeenat Masoodi, Advs. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Chanderni Prasad and Mr. Virender Tarun, Advs. for R2. Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel, for R1. AND + CRL.M.C. 3182/2011 PRAVEEN BHARGAVA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey, Mr. Manoj Taneja and Ms. Zeenat Masoodi, Advs. Versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.N. Mittal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Chanderni Prasad and Mr. Virender Tarun, Advs. for R2. Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel, for R1. AND + CRL.M.C. 2022/2011 SARAT CHANDER Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Prem Kumar and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advs. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel, for R...
Ram Pratap and anr Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
Manushi Sangathan, Delhi Vs. Govt. of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (C) 4572 of 2007 MANUSHI SANGATHAN, DELHI ..... Petitioner Versus GOVT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents with W.P. (C) 8580 of 2009 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents And CONT. CAS (C) 564 of 2010 MANUSHI SANGATHAN ..... Petitioner Versus P.K. PANDA AND ORS. .....Respondents Appearances: Ms. Indira Unninayar with Ms. Kirat Randhawa and Mr. Narayan Krishan, Advocates for Petitioners in WP (C) 4572 of 2007. Mr. V.K. Tandon and Mr. Yogesh Saini, Advocates for PWD and GNCTD. Mr. Sanjeev Ralli and Mr. Alpha Phiris Dayal, Advocates for Chandni Chowk Vyapar Mandal. Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. D.K. Singh, Advocates for UTTIPEC. Ms. Madhu Tewatia and Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocates for MCD. Mr. Rajiv Nanda, Addl. Standing Counsel, for Delhi Police. Ms. Geetanjali Mohan with Ms. Mansi Gautam, Advocates for Railways. Mr. Nalin Sinha, Petitioner in person in W....
Ramu and anr Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
Krishan Kumar Sharma and anr Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
Viacom 18 Media Private Ltd and anr. Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :23. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 3402/2013 VIACOM 1 MEDIA PRIVATE LTD & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioner Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocates with Mr. Ameet Naik, Mr. Harshvardhan Jha, Mr. Abhishek Kale and Ms. Anushree, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The programme Stand Up Club was telecast by the channel of the petitioner company on 26.5.2012 at 20-52 hours. Alleging that the said programme carried obscene dialogues and vulgar words besides being derogatory to women, a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner on 22.6.2012 requiring it to show cause why action as per the provisions of Down-Linking Guidelines, the terms and conditions of the permission granted and the provisions of Section 20 of the Cable Act should not be taken agai...
Smt. Jyoti Saini and anr Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »