Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

May 24 2013

Ramesh Chand Vs. Land and Building Department

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-24-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:24. 05.2013 W.P. (C) No.3508/2013 RAMESH CHAND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjiv Sahay, Adv. AND + W.P. (C) No.3509/2013 HIRA SINGH CHAUHAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjiv Sahay, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) Notice. Mr Sanjiv Sahay accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the parties, both these petitions are taken up for final disposal. The case of the petitioner in CWP No. 3509/2013 is that the land of his father in village Madan Pur Khadar was acquired vide Award No. 3/98-99. Pursuant to the said acquisition, the petitioner claims to have applied for allotment of an alternative plot in terms of the scheme for Large Scale Acquisition Development and Disposal of Land in Delhi, notified ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2013

H.N. Nawab Mirza HussaIn Anwar Khan Vs. Anand Finance Private Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-24-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 29, 2013 Decision on: May 24, 2013 CO. APPL Nos. 88 of 1982 in CO.PET. No. 34 of 1966 ANAND FINANCE PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Angad Singh Narula, Advocate for Applicant. versus R.P. ANAND ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. With CO.PET. No. 34D of 1966 H.N. NAWAB MIRZA HUSSAIN ANWAR KHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Angad Singh Narula, Advocate for Applicant. versus ANAND FINANCE PRIVATE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. With CRL. (O) CO. No. 2 of 1985 in CO.PET. No. 34 of 1966 ANAND FINANCE PRIVATE LTD. Co. Pet. No. 34 of 1966 ..... Petitioner Page 1 of 25 Through: Mr. D.S. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Angad Singh Narula, Advocate for Applicant. versus R.L. ANAND ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for the Official Liqu...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2013

Keshav Chander Thakur and anr Vs. Krishan Chander and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-24-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h May, 2013. + CS(OS) 1397/2011 KESHAV CHANDER THAKUR & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vivek Ojha & Mr. Manish Bishnoi, Advs. Versus KRISHAN CHANDER & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Samar Kachwaha & Mr. Mohan Bajaj, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGMENT % IA No.22835/2012 (u/O 6 R-17 CPC) & IA No.13394/2011 (u/O 7 R-11 CPC) 1. The two plaintiffs have instituted this suit for partition of, (a) property not B-11, Krishana Niwas, West End, New Delhi; (b) property No.245-A, Puran Nagar, Jammutawi, Jammu & Kashmir; and, (c) other movable properties as detailed in Schedule-A to the plaint, pleading: (i) that the property No.245-A, Puran Nagar, Jammutawi, Jammu & Kashmir admeasuring approximately 5000 sq. yds. was purchased for the benefit of the family of Thakur Dina Nath comprising of his wife Smt. Krishna Thakur, four sons namely ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2013

Phool Chand Maurya and ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-24-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. Appeal No. 671/2009 Reserved on:15. h February, 2013 Date of Decision:24. h May, 2013 % PHOOL CHAND MAURYA AND ORS. ....Appellant Through Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate for appellant Nos.1 and 3. Mr. Ajay Verma and Mr. Shiv Kumar Dwedi, Advocates for appellant No.2. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao and Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutors. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J: The appellants Phool Chand Maurya, Mohan Lal and Yogesh Kumar Maurya impugn common judgment against them by the Trial Court, dated 21st April, 2009 in FIR No. 155 of 2005, under Section 302/323/34 Indian Penal Code (IPC) for murder of Kuldeep and causing injury to his family members Raju and Dolly. By Order of Sentence dated 27th April, 2009 for the offence under Section 302/34 IPC, they have been sentenced to life imprisonment and fined Rs 500/each, in default of which they s...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2013

Praveen Bhargava Vs. State and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-24-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3182/2011 PRAVEEN BHARGAVA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey, Mr. Manoj Taneja and Ms. Zeenat Masoodi, Advs. Versus STATE & ANR. Through: % ..... Respondents Mr. R.N. Mittal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Chanderni Prasad and Mr. Virender Tarun, Advs. for R2. Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel, for R1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER 24 05.2013 For detailed orders, see Crl.M.C. No. 2019/2011. SURESH KAIT, J.MAY 24.2013 sb...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2013

Sarat Chander Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-24-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2022/2011 SARAT CHANDER Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Prem Kumar and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advs. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel, for R1. Mr.R.N.Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Chandrani Prasad, Adv. for R2. % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER 24 05.2013 For detailed orders, see Crl.M.C. No. 2019/2011. SURESH KAIT, J.MAY 24.2013 sb...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2013

Rajesh Kumar and anr Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-24-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2013

Shyam Sunder and anr. Vs. Meena Taneja

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-24-2013

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 161/2012 SHYAM SUNDER & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. K.G. Seth, Advocate. versus MEENA TANEJA Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI % ORDER 24 05.2013 Review Application No.286/2013 1. This is an application filed by the appellants under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Sections 114 & 151 CPC seeking review of order dated 6.5.2013.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellants and have gone through the record as well as the submissions made in the application.3. Before dealing with the review application, it may be pertinent here to mention that this is a regular second appeal filed by the appellants under Section 100 CPC against the judgment dated 1.9.2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge dismissing the appeal being R.C.A. No.30/2011 of the appellants titled Shyam Sunder & Anr. Vs. Meena Taneja.4. Briefly stated the facts leading to the filing of the regular...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2013