Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manju Rani Vs. Shiv Property Dealer and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:.24.05.2013 CM(M) 1028/2010 MANJU RANI Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sikandar Arora, Adv. versus SHIV PROPERTY DEALER & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr. P. Kumar, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 The petitioner is aggrieved by the findings returned in the order dated 16.04.2008 by the Additional District Judge (as the first appellate Court) in pursuance to the findings returned by the Civil Judge dated 20.01.2005. 2 Record shows that the present suit was filed for possession, permanent and mandatory injunction. Averments made in the plaint have been perused. The plaintiff claims himself to be the owner of plot bearing No. 48-A measuring 100 square yards out of Rect. No. 21, Killa Nos. 23 & 24 and Rect. No. 34, Killa Nos. 3, 4, 7 & 8 situated in the area of Village Dabri in Sagarpur, Delhi. He is stated to have purchased it vide a sale deed dated 24.04.1973. His contention was t...
M/S Usha Craft Vs. M/S A.B. Hotels Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: May 24, 2013 + ARB.P. 78/2013 M/S USHA CRAFT Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Subhasish Mohanty, Adv. versus M/S A.B HOTELS LTD Through ..... Respondent Ms.Surekha Raman, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of a sole independent Arbitrator.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has completed the works pertaining to the supply of furniture for Renovation of 77 Guest Rooms in Radisson Hotel to the satisfaction of the respondent. The petitioner informed that defect liability period of six months has expired on 6 th October, 2012 and requested to the respondent to release its retention money of `4,12,285/- for the furniture supplied to the respondent. The respondent was asked to pay the said amount along with interest @18% per annum from 6th October, 2012. ...
Chawal Singh and anr. Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
Anand Finance Private Ltd. Vs. R.P. Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 29, 2013 Decision on: May 24, 2013 CO. APPL Nos. 88 of 1982 in CO.PET. No. 34 of 1966 ANAND FINANCE PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Angad Singh Narula, Advocate for Applicant. versus R.P. ANAND ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. With CO.PET. No. 34D of 1966 H.N. NAWAB MIRZA HUSSAIN ANWAR KHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Angad Singh Narula, Advocate for Applicant. versus ANAND FINANCE PRIVATE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. With CRL. (O) CO. No. 2 of 1985 in CO.PET. No. 34 of 1966 ANAND FINANCE PRIVATE LTD. Co. Pet. No. 34 of 1966 ..... Petitioner Page 1 of 25 Through: Mr. D.S. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Angad Singh Narula, Advocate for Applicant. versus R.L. ANAND ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for the Official Liqu...
The Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-ii Vs. JaIn Exports Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. 05.2013 + ITA No.235/2013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-II ..... Appellant versus JAIN EXPORTS PVT. LTD. . Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate : None. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.This appeal is filed, on behalf of the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), challenging the order dated 30.03.2012 passed by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, setting aside the addition of sum of ` 1,53,48,850/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of purported cessation of liability.2. The assessee is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. The assessee company was engaged in the business of trading in agricultural commodities, however, the assessee did not conduct any business in the year 2007-2008 relevant to the a...
Sher Singh @ Bachhu Vs. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :24. h MAY, 2013. + CRL.A. 195/2011 SHER SINGH @ BACHHU Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sood, Advocate. Versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. The appellant- Sher Singh challenges judgment dated 08.12.2010 in Sessions Case No.510/2006 arising out of FIR No.258/2004 registered at PS Alipur, by which, he was convicted under Sections 395/397/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine ` 10,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant and his associates were that on 15.07.2004, he and his associates robed Manish Gupta and caused injuries to him. The present appellant was identified to be the person who was armed with rod and hit Manish Gupta. One black and white TV make Sony, suitcase containing clothes, cash, gold and silver jewellery were found missing from the house. DD (Daily Diary) No.2A was recorded at PS Alipur. S...
Rajinder Saini and anr Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2516/2013 RAJINDER SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shob...
Bilju A.T. Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
$~18 & 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h May, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 8744/2011 BILJU A.T. Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Rekha Palli, Ms.Punam Singh and Ms.Amrita Prakash, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Ashish Nishchal, Adv. W.P.(C) 1368/2012 MANORMA SINGH AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Rekha Palli, Ms.Punam Singh and Ms.Amrita Prakash, Advs. versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ashish Nishchal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA 1 In the year 1979, Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer in the judgment reported at (1979) 4 SCC 260.Miss C.B. Muthamma, I.F.S. v. Union of India and others stated thus: This writ petition by Miss Muthamma, a senior member of the Indian Foreign Service, bespeaks a story which makes one wonder whether Articles 14 and 16 belong to myth or reality. The credibility of constitutional mandates shall not be shaken by governmental action or inaction but it is the e...
Dilshad Vs. S R Sundaram and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :22. 05.2013 Pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(CRL) 837/2013 DILSHAD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Lal Bahadur Pandey, Advocate. versus S R SUNDARAM & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr.Sahil Mongia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 28.06.2012 passed by the learned M.M., Delhi in Complaint Case No.56/1/2011 titled Dilshad vs. S.R.Sundaram and Ors. whereby application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the Court and directions were given to the petitioner to lead pre-summoning evidence. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the order dated 04.12.2012 (mentioned in the petition as 04.12.2013) passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Delhi affirming the order of learned M.M. Prayer made ...
Hari Chand Saini and anr Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »