Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State (Govt of Nct Delhi ) Vs. Pratap NaraIn Singh @ Prem Nath Singh a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : April 01, 2013 DECIDED ON :27. h May, 2013 + CRL.L.P. 135/2007 STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI ) ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. versus PRATAP NARAIN SINGH @ PREM NATH SINGH & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Yogesh Swaroop, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 & 5. Mr.Bhanu Nandwani, Advocate for Respondent No.3 CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. State has preferred the petition for leave to appeal against the judgment dated 16.01.2007 in Sessions Case No.168/2001 by which the respondents were acquitted of all charges in case FIR No. 237/1999 under Sections 489B/489C/489D/467/120B IPC.2. I have heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the respondents and have examined the record. Allegations against R-1 were that he used two fake currency notes in the denomination of `100/- each to purchase bus tickets from Kasturi Lal at Kashmeri Gate, ISBT to go to Haridwar. DD No.16A w...
VipIn Rathi Vs. the Commissioner of Police, Through Dy. Commissioner o ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2013
G. George Paracken, Member (J) Applicant in this Original Application was a candidate for the post of Constable (Executive) Male in Delhi Police in the recruitment held in the year 2011 . In this Original Application, he has challenged the impugned Annexure-B notice dated 22.11.2012 calling upon him why his candidature for the said post should not be cancelled. He has also challenged the impugned Annexure-A order dated 11.12.2012 cancelling his candidature. The relevant part of the said order reads as under:- In response to Show Cause Notice dated 22.11.2012, you had submitted your reply dated 07.12.2012 stating therein the plea(s) that the above said case was registered against you as the complainant had personal grudges and taken personal vendetta during the Panchayat Election (Gram Pardhan) and this is due to one of the jealousy in framing up the case due to pursue of your higher qualification in BCA only being student from your village. You were neither arrested by the Police nor t...
Hari Chand and anr Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :24. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 2517/2013 RAKESH KUMAR SAINI AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2518/2013 JAI CHAND AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2519/2013 KRISHAN KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Kumar Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. for DDA W.P.(C) 2792/2013 RAMU & ANR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.N. Gupta, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Shobhna Takiar, Adv. ...
Hira Singh Chauhan Vs. Land and Building Department
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:24. 05.2013 W.P. (C) No.3508/2013 RAMESH CHAND Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjiv Sahay, Adv. AND + W.P. (C) No.3509/2013 HIRA SINGH CHAUHAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjiv Sahay, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) Notice. Mr Sanjiv Sahay accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. With the consent of the parties, both these petitions are taken up for final disposal. The case of the petitioner in CWP No. 3509/2013 is that the land of his father in village Madan Pur Khadar was acquired vide Award No. 3/98-99. Pursuant to the said acquisition, the petitioner claims to have applied for allotment of an alternative plot in terms of the scheme for Large Scale Acquisition Development and Disposal of Land in Delhi, notified ...
Dr.Baba Sahib Ambedkar Hospital Represented By: It Vs. Swastika Bhakat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: May 10, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 24, 2013 + WP(C) No.424/2013 DR.BABA SAHIB AMBEDKAR HOSPITAL REPRESENTED BY: ITS MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT AND ORS. .....Petitioners Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate versus SWASTIKA BHAKAT & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Mr.Pawan Bahl, Advocate with Ms.Kamlakshi Singh, Advocate WP(C)No.3077/2013 PARAS NATH & ORS. Represented by: .....Petitioners Mr.Pawan Bahl, Advocate versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Advocate with Ms.Sana Ansari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Staff nurses working on contract basis with Dr.Baba Sahib Ambedkar Hospital, established by the Government of NCT Delhi, and appointed on different dates in the months of July and August 2001 filed OA No.1843/2010 raising issues of being discriminat...
Shailender Pratap Singh Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % 1. W.P.(C) Nos.5689/2012 & 6776/2012 May 24, 2013 W.P.(C) No.5689/2012 SHAILENDER PRATAP SINGH Through: VERSUS ......Petitioner Ms. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. S.M. Arif, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Ajit Pudussery, Advocate for respondent No.2.2. W.P.(C) No.6776 /2012 LOKESH Through: VERSUS ......Petitioner Mr. Satya Mitra Garg, Advocate. STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. S.M. Arif, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Ajit Pudussery, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.5689/2012 1. Petitioner applied for appointment with the respondent No.2/Food Corporation of India for the post of Assistant Grade III (Technical-post code C). Petitioner appeared in tests of various subjects conducted by the respondent No.1 on behalf of respondent No.2. Di...
Ranvir Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on May 22, 2013 Judgment Delivered on May 24, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2969/2012 RANVIR SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.P.Gupta, Advocate Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ...Respondents Represented by: Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the order dated January 24, 2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in Original Application No.1098/2011 whereby the Tribunal dismissed the Original Application filed by the petitioner and one Daulat Ram Sharma.2. The petitioner retired from service under the respondent on May 31, 2010 as Vice Principal, on attaining the age of superannuation. The next promotion post is that of Principal. On November 10, 2008 an eligibility list for grant of promotion to the post of Principals for the vacancy year 2008-2009 was circulat...
State Thr. Addl. Dy.Comm. of Police Crime, Delhi Vs. Sarat Chander and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 208/2012 STATE THR. ADDL. DY.COMM. OF POLICE CRIME, DELHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel Versus SARAT CHANDER & ORS. Through: % ..... Respondents Mr. Prem Kumar and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advs. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Dubey, Mr. Manoj Taneja and Ms. Zeenat Masoodi, Advs. Mr.R.N.Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Chandrani Prasad, Adv. for R2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER 24 05.2013 For detailed orders, see Crl.M.C. No. 2019/2011. SURESH KAIT, J.MAY 24.2013 sb...
Lokesh Vs. Staff Selection Commission and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % 1. W.P.(C) Nos.5689/2012 & 6776/2012 May 24, 2013 W.P.(C) No.5689/2012 SHAILENDER PRATAP SINGH Through: VERSUS ......Petitioner Ms. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. S.M. Arif, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Ajit Pudussery, Advocate for respondent No.2.2. W.P.(C) No.6776 /2012 LOKESH Through: VERSUS ......Petitioner Mr. Satya Mitra Garg, Advocate. STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. S.M. Arif, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Ajit Pudussery, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) W.P.(C) No.5689/2012 1. Petitioner applied for appointment with the respondent No.2/Food Corporation of India for the post of Assistant Grade III (Technical-post code C). Petitioner appeared in tests of various subjects conducted by the respondent No.1 on behalf of respondent No.2. Di...
Anand Finance Private Ltd. Vs. R.L. Anand
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 29, 2013 Decision on: May 24, 2013 CO. APPL Nos. 88 of 1982 in CO.PET. No. 34 of 1966 ANAND FINANCE PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Angad Singh Narula, Advocate for Applicant. versus R.P. ANAND ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. With CO.PET. No. 34D of 1966 H.N. NAWAB MIRZA HUSSAIN ANWAR KHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D.S. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Angad Singh Narula, Advocate for Applicant. versus ANAND FINANCE PRIVATE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. With CRL. (O) CO. No. 2 of 1985 in CO.PET. No. 34 of 1966 ANAND FINANCE PRIVATE LTD. Co. Pet. No. 34 of 1966 ..... Petitioner Page 1 of 25 Through: Mr. D.S. Narula, Senior Advocate with Mr. Angad Singh Narula, Advocate for Applicant. versus R.L. ANAND ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for the Official Liqu...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »