Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. M/S. Anand Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order Reserved on:13. h May, 2013 Order Pronounced on:31. t May, 2013 % + CS(OS) No.3024/2012 & I.A.No.20666/2012 BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.R.V.Sinha, Adv. with Ms.Sangeeta Rai, Adv. versus M/S ANAND BROTHERS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.Gurmehar S.Sistani, Adv. for D-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff/objector, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. has filed the objections under Sections 30 & 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for settingaside the Award dated 25th June, 2010 passed by the sole Arbitrator.2. Brief facts are that the agreement No.21/EE/(E)-II/1990-91 for carrying out the work called P/I Automatic Wet Riser Fire Fighting System at T.E. Building, Tis Hazari, New Delhi was executed by and on behalf of the Union of India and defendant No.1. Consequent upon the formation of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. w.e.f. 1st October, 2000 in terms of the policy decision of the Cen...
Nestle India Limited and anr Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 4832/1995 NESTLE INDIA LIMITED & ANR ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Desai, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Batra, Ms. Mallika Joshi, Mr. Amit Agarwal, Ms. Amrita Chatterjee and Mr. Rajan Narain, Advocates. For the Respondent :Mr. Rajeev Mehra, ASG with Ms. Meera Bhatia and Mr. Ashish Virmani, Advocates for R-1/UOI Mr. C.V. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for the Intervener (ACASH) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. By way of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, inter alia, are seeking the following reliefs:- (i) Declare the provisions of Sections 2(1)(f), 6 (1)(a), (b) and (c) of the Infant Milk Substitutes, feeding Bottles and Infant foods (Regulation of Prod...
Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 ITR 49-50/1996 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + .. Respondent ITA 151/2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + ..... Respondent ITA 302/2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + ..... Respondent ITA 480/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr N.P. Sahni. For the Respondent : Mr O.P. Dua, Sr. Adv. with Ms Babita CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.These are three appeals and a reference which involve similar issues and thus have been taken up together. ITR Nos. 49-50/1996 are cross references, one made by the assessee and the other preferred on behalf of the revenue again...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Cellular Operators Association of Ind ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. 04.2013. Decided on :31. 05.2013 LPA 200/2013 and CM 5410/2013 ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICES and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Ramji Srinivasan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Umang Gupta, Mr.Faraz Maqbool, Ms.Kabita Das, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED and ORS... Respondents Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Mr.Siddharth Tyagi, Mr.Amit Singh, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Ms.Sweta Gupta, Advs. for BSNL/R-1. Mrs.Sangeeta Singh, Adv. with Mr.Kumar Rajan Mishra, Advs. for TRAI/R-3 + LPA 201/2013 and CM Nos. 5418/2013 & 6578/2013 CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr.Manjul Bajpai, Mr.Sarvajeet Kumar Thakur, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED .....Respondent Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr. Abhishek Kuma...
Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 ITR 49-50/1996 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + .. Respondent ITA 151/2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + ..... Respondent ITA 302/2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + ..... Respondent ITA 480/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr N.P. Sahni. For the Respondent : Mr O.P. Dua, Sr. Adv. with Ms Babita CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.These are three appeals and a reference which involve similar issues and thus have been taken up together. ITR Nos. 49-50/1996 are cross references, one made by the assessee and the other preferred on behalf of the revenue again...
Yashpal Raghav Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:02. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on:31. 05.2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.222/2009 YASHPAL RAGHAV Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP. versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The appellant herein has preferred this appeal against his conviction by the impugned judgment dated 17.03.09 under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Vide order dated 18.03.09, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and a fine of Rs. 3000/- for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment for a period of three months. For the offence under Section 13(2), the appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and a fine of Rs. 3000/- and in default in pay...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 ITR 49-50/1996 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + .. Respondent ITA 151/2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + ..... Respondent ITA 302/2002 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD + ..... Respondent ITA 480/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr N.P. Sahni. For the Respondent : Mr O.P. Dua, Sr. Adv. with Ms Babita CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.These are three appeals and a reference which involve similar issues and thus have been taken up together. ITR Nos. 49-50/1996 are cross references, one made by the assessee and the other preferred on behalf of the revenue again...
Commissioner of Income-tax Delhi-xv, New Delhi Vs. Smt. Neenu Dutta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 + ITA 279/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX DELHI-XV, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant versus SMT. NEENU DUTTA . Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant :Mr Kiran Babu For the Respondent :Mr Salil Aggarwal with Mr Ravi Pratap Mall CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J.1. This is an appeal filed on behalf of the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"). The appellant herein has challenged the order dated 20.07.2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 215/Del/2012 for the assessment year 2008-09. The controversy in the present case relates to levy of penalty by the Assessing Officer under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act.2. The assessee filed a return under the Act for the assessment year 2008-09 on 30.09.2008 declaring an income of ` 78,83,303/-. The assessee did not incl...
Baij Nath Mittal Vs. State Thr.C.B.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :13. h MAY, 2013 DECIDED ON :31. t MAY, 2013 + CRL.A. 1037/2012 & CRL.M.B.Nos.285/2013 & 1633/2012 BAIJ NATH MITTAL Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Rebecca M.John, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Kushdeep Gaur & Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocates. versus STATE THR.C.B.I. Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P. AND + CRL.A. 1090/2012 & CRL.M.B.1701/2012 MUKESH KUMAR GUPTA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Vishal Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Kushdeep Gaur & Mr.Harsh Bora, Advocates. versus STATE THR.CBI Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.CRL.M.B.Nos.285/2013 & 1633/2012 in CRL.A.1037/2012 & CRL.M.B.1701/2012 in CRL.A.1090/2012 1. The appellants- Baij Nath Mittal and Mukesh Kumar Gupta seek suspension of sentence under Section 389 Cr.P.C. I have heard the counsel for the appellants and learned Spl.P.P. Apparently, allegations against the appellants are very serious whereby they allegedly...
State Vs. Vinod@pandit
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 547/2011 Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 STATE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen Sharma, APP for the State Versus VINOD@PANDIT Through: ..... Respondent Mr. G.C. Mishra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR 1 By this petition filed under Section 397of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr. P. C.) the State seeks to challenge the impugned order dated 11.3.2011 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge declared the accused respondent a juvenile at the time of commission of the alleged offence.2. Briefly stating the facts of the present case, the responded is accused in FIR bearing No. 439/09 registered under Sections 302/397/34 IPC and FIR No. 529/09. To prove his juvenility on the date of commission of the alleged offence i.e. on 30.10.2009, the accused respondent had filed before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, the cop...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »