Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
H.K.Bharti Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: May 20, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 31, 2013 + WP(C)No.4171/2012 H.K.BHARTI Represented by: .....Petitioner Mr.Rana Parveen Siddiqui, Advocate with Mr.Javed Ahmed and Mr.Eram Khan, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.B.V.Niren, CGSC with Mr.Prasouk Jain, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Anas Tanwir, Advocate for Mr.Rajiv Nanda, ASC for R-2 Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate for R3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. It was alleged against the petitioner that while functioning as Sales Tax Officer in the Enforcement Branch of the Sales Tax Department, Government of NCT of Delhi on July 24, 2002, he impounded truck not DL-1G-9270 carrying semi-refined paraffin wax. The consignee was M/s.Sunrise International Jaipur. But the driver of the truck informed him that the goods were meant to be unloaded at A-17, J...
Cico Technologies Ltd. Vs. M/S Shriram Enterprises and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:14. h May, 2013 Judgment delivered on:31. t May, 2013 % + Arb.P.No.342/2012 CICO TECHNOLOGIES LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ramesh Singh, Adv. with Ms.Megha Mukerjee, Adv. versus M/S SHRIRAM ENTERPRISES & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Mohit Gupta, Mr.Aditya Singh & Mr.Aman Garg, Advs. + O.M.P. No.786/2012 CICO TECHNOLOGIES LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ramesh Singh, Adv. with Ms.Megha Mukerjee, Adv. versus M/S SHRIRAM ENTERPRISES & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Mohit Gupta, Mr.Aditya Singh & Mr.Aman Garg, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order, I propose to decide the two petitions filed by the petitioner, CICO Technologies Ltd.; the first one is under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) being Arb.P.No.342/2012 for appointment of sole Arbitrator, and second p...
Delhi Jal Board and ors. Vs. M/S Khub Chand Tyagi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :9. h May, 2013 Judgment pronounced on:31. t May, 2013 % + OMP No.887/2012 DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.L.K. Singh, Adv. versus M/S KHUB CHAND TYAGI ..... Respondent Through Mr.Vivekanand, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This is a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the Award dated 14 th May, 2012 passed by the learned sole Arbitrator appointed by learned Additional District Judge in Suit No.469/2004, whereby the learned Arbitrator has allowed all the claims of the respondent.2. Claim Nos.1 and 4 had been admitted by the petitioner before the learned Arbitrator and thus the Award of claim Nos.2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 has been challenged by the petitioner.3. The brief facts are : i) The petitioner herein (erstwhile Delhi Water Supply and Sewage Disposal undertaking now reconstituted and taken ove...
M/S thermo Blow Engineers Vs. Dda and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :29. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :31. 05.2013 W.P(C) No.669/2013 M/S THERMO BLOW ENGINEERS ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sidharth Joshi and Mr. Ankur, Advocates versus DDA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The petitioner before this Court Shri Vijay Kumar Grover is carrying business under the name and style of `M/s Thermo Blow Engineers and is engaged in manufacturing and supply of various sports and fitness equipments. The respondent/DDA invited quotations for supply of belts and decks for Johnsons make Treadmill, to be supplied within 15 days of the order. The quotation of the petitioner having been accepted, an order was placed with him for supply of the aforesaid articles. After some days of the supply, the respondent complained that jerk was felt during workout of treadmill and there were chances of the user getting injured during the ...
Sh. N.K Ghai Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on May 17, 2013 Judgment Delivered on May 31, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2215/2012 SH. N. K GHAI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Raman Duggal, Advocate versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Mr.Vardhman Kaushik and Ms.Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Advocates for R-2 Mr.Vinay Kumar Garg, Ms.Namrata Singh and Mr.Amit Srivastava, Advocates for R-3 to R-9 Mr.Raman Duggal, Advocate for R-10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated January 27, 2012 passed by a five Member Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in Transfer Application No.154/2009, whereby the Tribunal represented through its majority decision (4:1 in favour) has allowed the Transfer Application thereby, interalia, directing the re...
Yashpal Raghav Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:02. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on:31. 05.2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL No.222/2009 YASHPAL RAGHAV Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP. versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The appellant herein has preferred this appeal against his conviction by the impugned judgment dated 17.03.09 under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Vide order dated 18.03.09, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and a fine of Rs. 3000/- for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment for a period of three months. For the offence under Section 13(2), the appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and a fine of Rs. 3000/- and in default in pay...
Sharwan Kumar Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.2434/2013, 2439/2013, 2511/2013, 2513/2013 & 2514/2013 Date of decision:30. h May, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 2434/2013 DEEPAK KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2439/2013 PRADYUMN KUMAR TOMAR Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2511/2013 SHARWAN KUMAR YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2513/2013 VAREITHING A. SHATSANG ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Soayib Qureshi, Adv. and + W.P.(C) 2514/2013 ASHWANI KUMAR Through...
M.P.Singh Sahni and anr Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :1. t FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 2444-45/2005 & CRL.M.A.Nos.5920/2005 & 5541/2006 M.P.SINGH SAHNI & ANR Through : ..... Petitioners Mr.M.P.Singh Sahni in person. versus STATE & ANR Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Harnam Singh in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. M.P.Singh Sahni (hereinafter referred as the petitioner or accused) has preferred various petitions CRL.M.C.Nos. 3772/2003, 244445/2005, 54/2008, 2790/2000, 3773/2003, 3779/2003, 3781/2003, 3782/2003, 3784/2003, 3193/2005 and 3783/2003 for quashing of the various criminal proceedings initiated against him by Harnam Singh (hereinafter referred as complainant or respondent No.2).2. Case of the complainant is that he is a highly qualified ex- banker having an experience of seventeen years. He was earlier posted at Senior Executive level in a Nationalized Bank. The petitioner and his wife Narider Pal Kaur Sahni engaged him to pr...
In the Matter Of: International Ceramics Ltd. Vs. ------
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. No. 222 of 1999 Decision on: May 30, 2013 IN THE MATTER OF: INTERNATIONAL CERAMICS LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Goel, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. Mr. Yashpal Rangi, Advocate for S.P. Jind (Haryana). Mr. Mayank Kumar, Advocate for Keshav Security Services Ltd. Ms. Indrani Mukherjee, Advocate for IARC. Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Advocate for Phoenix ARC. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt with Mr. Abhishek Anand, Advocates for IDBI and IFCI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER 30 05.2013 Co. Appl. No. 220 of 2012 [In the matter of Keshav Security Services (P) Ltd.] 1. This is an application by the Official Liquidator (OL) for a direction to Keshav Security Services (P) Limited (KSSPL) to deposit an amount of Rs. 99,15,440 with the OL towards missing items as valued by M/s. Chadha & Associates.2. The background to the application is that International Ceramics Limited (ICL), was ordered to be wound up by this Court on 8th March 2001 and the OL was ...
Satya Dev Lal Vs. L.G.Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On: May 22, 2013 Judgment Delivered On: May 30, 2013 + W.P.(C) 5464/2012 SATYA DEV LAL Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Singal, Advocate versus L.G. DELHI & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sumit Chander, Advocate for R-1 & R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Rule 28 of the Delhi Police (Appointment & Recruitment) Rules, 1980, till it was amended when notification dated April 22, 2008 was issued, reads as under:28. Enlistment of ex-soldiers, ex-policemen and reservists.(1) Re-enlistment shall be permissible only in the rank of constable and past service will count for pension as per provisions of rules 18 and 19 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972:(a) Ex-servicemen and ex-members of all Police forces of States of Union Territory, who were paid from the Central/State revenues may be re-enlisted as constables at the discretion of the appoint...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »