Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Association of Unified Telecom Services and ors. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Ni ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. 04.2013. Decided on :31. 05.2013 LPA 200/2013 and CM 5410/2013 ASSOCIATION OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICES and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Ramji Srinivasan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Umang Gupta, Mr.Faraz Maqbool, Ms.Kabita Das, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED and ORS... Respondents Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Mr.Siddharth Tyagi, Mr.Amit Singh, Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Ms.Sweta Gupta, Advs. for BSNL/R-1. Mrs.Sangeeta Singh, Adv. with Mr.Kumar Rajan Mishra, Advs. for TRAI/R-3 + LPA 201/2013 and CM Nos. 5418/2013 & 6578/2013 CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through : Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gopal Jain, Mr.Manjul Bajpai, Mr.Sarvajeet Kumar Thakur, Advs. Versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED .....Respondent Through : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with Ms.Maneesha Dhir, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.K.P.S.Kohli, Mr. Abhishek Kuma...
Vijay Prakash Gupta Vs. J.N. Prasad
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.266 OF 200.& CM No.14449/2007 Decided on :31. t May, 2013 VIJAY PRAKASH GUPTA Through: Appellant Mr.Hameed Shaikh, Mr.Amar Pal and Ms. Nisha Rawat, Advs. Versus Respondent J.N. PRASAD Through : None CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is a regular second appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 18.8.2007 dismissing RCA No.21/2005 titled Sh.Vijay Prakash Gupta (deceased) Thr. LRs Vs. Sh.J.N.Prasad (deceased) Thr. LRs.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the respondent/J.N.Prasad (since deceased) had filed a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction against the appellant(since deceased) and against the respondent nos. 6 and 7 in respect of a godown situated at the back side of shop No.3356-7, Hauz Quazi, opposite Police Station no.2, Delhi-06 and the staircase leading towards the said godown. It was alleged in the plaint that originally M/s Ram Richpal Mal Ghasi Ram were the tenants in the su...
ishvakoo (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. National Projects Construction Corporat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:13th May, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on:31. t May, 2013 % + O.M.P. No.1098/2012 ISHVAKOO (INDIA) PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Lakshmi Gurung, Adv. versus NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Madhurendra Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The abovementioned petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short, called the Act) seeking directions to terminate the mandate of the sole Arbitrator.2. The petitioner is a private company, whose registered office is in New Delhi. The Board has authorized the CMD, Mr.Kamal Radhu to represent the Company. The respondent is a public sector company, also having its registered office in New Delhi. The present petition is with regards the termination of the mandate of Mr.K.K.Gupta, the Ch...
Dinanath Batra and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t May, 2013 % + W.P.(C) No.651/2012 DINANATH BATRA & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Jagdeep Dhankar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. B.S. Shukla, Ms. Monika Arora, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ... Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Ms. Aditi Gupta, Mr. A.K. Chaudhary, Advs. for UPSC. CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation, impugns the letter No.13018/4/2008-AISI dated 15.10.2010 of the Government of India, Department of Personnel & Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions to the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) communicating the approval to the changes in the Preliminary Examination of the Civil Services Examination, from the year 2011 onwards. Though the changes effected by the said letter are manifold, the challenge is only to inclusion i...
Sarita Arora Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3906/2011 Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 SARITA ARORA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Mohd. Irfan, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR 1 By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 10.3.2011 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate framed the charge against the petitioner under Section 411/482/34 IPC and order dated 25.7.2011 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge upheld the order of charge passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate.2. Arguing the present petition Mr.Mohd. Irfan, counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case even after the investigation against her had stopped ba...
Sh. N.K Ghai Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on May 17, 2013 Judgment Delivered on May 31, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2215/2012 SH. N. K GHAI ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Raman Duggal, Advocate versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Naresh Kaushik, Mr.Vardhman Kaushik and Ms.Amita Kalkal Chaudhary, Advocates for R-2 Mr.Vinay Kumar Garg, Ms.Namrata Singh and Mr.Amit Srivastava, Advocates for R-3 to R-9 Mr.Raman Duggal, Advocate for R-10 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated January 27, 2012 passed by a five Member Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in Transfer Application No.154/2009, whereby the Tribunal represented through its majority decision (4:1 in favour) has allowed the Transfer Application thereby, interalia, directing the re...
Kumar Nikhil @ Saroj Kumar Shukla @ Jhunnu Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. h May, 2013 Date of Decision:31. t May, 2013 % + BAIL APPLN. 704/2013 KUMAR NIKHIL @ SAROJ KUMAR SHUKLA @ JHUNNU ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP along with SI Hasrat Ali, CAW Cell, PS New Ashok Nagar. Complainant in person with her counsel. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is an application for anticipatory bail filed under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.351/2012 at P.S. New Ashok Nagar under sections 498A/ 406/ 34 of the IPC.2. The bail application arises in the following circumstances. The complainant Neelam, daughter of Radha Krishan Mishra, was married to the applicant, who is an advocate by profession on 18.05.2005 in Bihar. Approximately a sum of `7,00,000/- is stated to have been spent on the marriage, in addition to a sum of `3,00,000/- said to have been given to the applicant to start life; ...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Delhi Press Patra Prakashan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:31. 05.2013 ITA 1732/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ....Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN .Respondent ITA 1733/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN ..... Respondent ITA 1734/2006 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN ..... Respondent ITA 451/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent ITA 779/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV ..... Appellant versus M/S DELHI PRESS PATRA PRAKASHAN LTD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr N.P. Sahni. For the Respondent : Mr O.P. Dua, Sr. Adv. with Ms Babita CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J 1.These are appeals which have been preferred by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter refer...
Hrd Corporation Vs. Gail(India) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 178/2013 and I.A.No.3669/2013 Date of decision :31. t MAY, 2013 % HRD CORPORATION Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shailendra Swarup, Ms. Bindu Saxena, Mr. K.K. Patra, Ms. Aparajita Swarup and Ms. Neha Khattar, Advs. versus GAIL(INDIA) LTD Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Tejan Karnia, Mr. Nitesh Jain, Mr. Surendu Das and Mr. Shakti, Advs. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT O.M.P. 178/2013 and I.A.No.3669/2013 1. The petitioner is seeking interim injunction for restraining the respondent from selling the wax produced at its new plant namely HDPE/LLDPE Plant at its Petro Chemical Complex at Pata, U.P. to any third party. The petitioner is also seeking a direction to the respondent to supply the entire quantity of wax produced at its aforesaid plant to the petitioner according to the terms of the agreement dated 1st April, 1999.2. Vide ex-parte order dated 25th Febr...
Ravinder Manchanda and ors. Vs. Rajnish Aggarwal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-31-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + F.A.O. No.146 of 2013 & C.M. No.4806/2013 (for stay) Decided on :31. t May, 2013 DELHI & DISTRICT CRICKET ASSOCIATION Appellants Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P.D. Gupta & Ms. Sunita Tiwari, Advocates. Versus RAJNISH AGGARWAL & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. N.N. Aggarwal, Mr. Rohit Gandhi & Mr. Varun Garg, Advocates for R-1 & 2. Mr. V.P. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harikishan, Advocate for R-2 to 7. Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Advocate for R-12. WITH + F.A.O. No.145 of 2013 & C.M. No.4803/2013 (for stay) RAVINDER MANCHANDA & ORS. Appellants Through: Mr. V.P. Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Harikishan, Advocate. Versus RAJNISH AGGARWAL & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. N.N. Aggarwal, Mr. Rohit Gandhi & Mr. Varun Garg, Advocates for R-1 & 2. Ms. Ritika Godhwani, Advocate for R-5. Mr. Tanuj Khurana, Advocate for R-7. Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. P.D. Gupta & Ms. Sunita Tiwari, Advocates for R-16. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »